• DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The next big thing is NI: natural intelligence! Replace you hallucinating AI with a person that can solve problems without hallucinating (usually)!

    • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Ah man I can’t wait for the advertising to pick up on this.

      “Has AI crapped the bed again? Here at “local store” we have genuine authentic humans to interact with”

  • RamSwamson
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So in Texas the powerball reached over a billion dollars recently and a single person claimed the jackpot with a single ticket using AI to generate the winning numbers. Besides that I have seen no other real profit in the real world. Gotta figure out how they did it before the bubble pops I guess.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Instead of looking for other avenues for growth, though, PwC found that executives are worried about falling behind by not leaning into AI enough.

    “A small group of companies are already turning AI into measurable financial returns, whilst many others are still struggling to move beyond pilots,” said PwC global chairman Mohamed Kande in a statement. “That gap is starting to show up in confidence and competitiveness, and it will widen quickly for those that don’t act.”

    PwC also pointed out that most companies were lacking the “AI foundations, such as clearly defined road maps and sufficient levels of investment” to realize a return.

    And I imagine the only reason I’m drowning is that I didn’t bring enough gallons of their energy drink into the sea with me. Wow.

  • ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Instead of looking for other avenues for growth, though, PwC found that executives are worried about falling behind by not leaning into AI enough.

    These are the people in charge of the economy.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s the “sunk cost fallacy”. They’ve already invested so much, that turning back now means a total loss…when success “might be” just around the corner, if they only invest a little more. In for a penny, in for a pound.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Not just sunk cost, they see all this apparent press, writers, business leaders saying they have fantastic results, so obviously they most be doing something wrong.

        I have seen it over and over again in tech. People are told that everyone else in the world is doing great with some tech and everyone is so afraid they are “not getting” something they won’t say anything or else they will pretend they also “get it” and it is awesome.

        Not even things that have marketing spend behind it, some programming paradigm or whatever. Marketing spend makes it worse, but all by ourselves everyone seems to be afraid to somehow be seen as a clueless Luddite at any second.

        It’s really weird when you attend some talk where the guy talks up sonething or another and then in more casual private conversation basically admits straight up that he actually doesn’t see the benefit, but feels like he has to dance the dance.

      • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The mentality of the gambler. There’s a lot of people out there who have this addiction and just aren’t fortunate enough to have lucked into becoming a CEO. That’s how you know it’s a lottery, and being born into riches is a. shortcut.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Specifically this context. Like “falling behind in school,” I get. There are grades. Some people do better while some fall behind. It’s a scaler value with a good end and a bad end.

          But the AI bros are co-opting the phrase and presupposing that ALL OF TECHNOLOGY is on a linear scale where the good end is more AI shit and the bad end is less AI shit. They’re using a scaler when they should be using a vector.

          I’ve mentioned it before on here, but my cousin is taking an AI class in college. He tried to convince my business-owner uncle to let him create an agent for his company’s website so he won’t “fall behind.”

          My uncle owns a gas station.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Haha, alright — I totally understand what you mean. Yet another phrase co-opted by those that would rather spend their time seeming intelligent rather than being intelligent.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            While it’s felt so keenly now, it has always been a part of tech. Some amazing stuff comes out, and thus everything most be amazing and you can’t afford to miss out.

            In practice, if the tech is truly that great, then you can catch up real quick after waiting to understand if it is great. But everyone FOMOs constantly.

            • ch00f@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I think it’s different this time around. Tech pundits might write “If Apple doesn’t have a VR/AR product in the next six months, they’re falling behind,” but this is the first time in my memory that it’s been tech companies staring down consumers and small businesses and saying “If you don’t adapt to this technology, you will lose your job.”

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A common phrase of mine is, “the truth is, there is no bus driver at the wheel”.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Majority of people that aren’t out of touch with reality are completely unsurprised.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Rich people: Debunking the idea that the rich are the smartest since about 10,000 BCE.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And here is the umpteenth reason to think that C-suites run only on nepotism and empty promises: they’re filled with people who are actively bad at their jobs. But while the rest of us gain skills and hone them to try and make a handful of extra peanuts, the guys in the corner offices get handed jobs by family members or friends, simply because it is their destiny to have it.

    And thus they never have to be good at it, and any competition for it is artificial, and you end up with people holding the reins of entire companies who have literally no idea the consequences of their decisions or the impact of their policies.

    AI has never delivered a return – at all – and most of these people probably cannot even define how it works or what benefit it is meant to bring, outside of “replace people with machine, bring more $$$, why use more people when less people do trick?”.