

That’s fine, but they did use AI in development, so whether or not they removed the assets they should not be included in this award category.


That’s fine, but they did use AI in development, so whether or not they removed the assets they should not be included in this award category.
I think you are overthinking this mate.
2 shapes are the same colour
2 shapes are filled
2 shapes have four sides
the point of this is that there are multiple distinct properties not found in any member of the remainder set
You are whining about what “girls get away with” I think there is a maturity-issue here for sure, and it is your own.


I don’t think there is any problem with using AI art as a placeholder until the real art is ready.
I also don’t think there is any problem with being disqualified from a competition that says “No AI Art” for doing so.


Or like they submitted a game to an award that said no AI in development, said they didn’t use AI in development, when in reality they did.
Reverse racism is just racism. Not sure what the point or value of the extra semantics are.
Right, but a conspiracy theory would be to go back to before climate change was a widely accepted thing and then claiming that Exxon were sitting on information that could ultimately lead to the end of human civilisation.
Many people make such claims about things that are currently happening, and are all lumped in together as insane people that should not be trusted.
Who are you to say there “are a handful” of legitimate conspiracy theories? Have you yourself looked into them yourself, or are you just saying what the majority would?
Just with the Trump administration itself, I would say there are hundreds of conspiracies going on there. Whilst many of them are out in the open, there are others we can theorise on.
You need to stop seeing a distinction between male and female and realise there are shitty people and not-shitty people.


If it was about money, these updates would be bundled into a DLC, or they would be focused on churning Haunted Chocolatier out.
ConcernedApe is just a swell guy who loves Stardew Valley
The fact that you are so hung up on classroom behaviour shows your maturity level.
If you made me some food, and I said: “I’m sorry, but I really do not like the taste of this food.” that would be a polite way of saying to you: “I would rather I did like this food, because I like you as a person. But because of my respect for you, I am being honest. I do not like the food.”


The answer to this post, and almost everything, is to tax the wealthy.
AI is not ruining anything. The people in control of it are.
not really? slippery slope fallacy
who cares what people think? we’re all going to die anyway, just use the words you want to use to say the things you want to say. whether or not you align with a stranger on the internet is only as relevant as you want it to be.


this is not true at all. as somebody who unfortunately has had too many conversations with these people, they are staunchly in the pro-israel camp. have you not seen the marches for the UK where they carried israel flags? this is misinformation.


if you say so


see how obvious it was?


It’s just obvious from your way of speaking that this is a rewriting of history, yes you have mentioned some poor world building she has done outside of her literature, that is almost entirely irrelevant to the books she has written.
Calling her works ‘mediocre’ is once again, objectively incorrect and in my opinion (this is an assumption) is fuelled by your own personal feelings towards her.
I don’t know. It’s not really up to me to figure that out, either. Companies should self-report on their AI usage.