

There’s difference between complexity and unreadability


There’s difference between complexity and unreadability


One of the main fucking points of a mathematical proof is to be clear and convincing. If it is not convincing and reducible to simple steps, it’s not a proof at all.


Self-lerning might be realised just as adaptive control I suppose or very basic machine learning like linear regression and such things can be hyped as AI. But of course, I just speculate, maybe they are insane enough to use code from chatgpt or deep learning network which does not generalise since it would require billions of training examples.
Random excercises at least stimulate various muscles
Just normal British intercourse
My little heart is so warmer reading this

Trump, you leftist eco-terrorist
Good job mate
I do not want to believe we are so fucked up. Just have enough my own shit. No.


Fortunately, their work is appreciated and used around the world. I like libreoffice very much, there is no looking back.

What about a car using a huge window mounted on a mast as a sail?
Intolerance to not tolerant - just use the double negation and the paradox disappears.
For me, they’re some radical anarchist, especially of the flavour which rejects technology and proposes going back to tribal, gatherer life (not my cup of tea). But any progressive movement with some signs of democracy and true equality is more to left than tankies. Of course, I do admit that sometimes there is a need for authority – like in the paradox of tolerance, the problem with free speech etc.
It is not a horseshoe: tankies are just another flavour of far right


Good. Fuck nazi states of America. And no, I am not an Iran blindly supporting tankie.


I wonder why so many downvotes


It’s simple: Americans are a kind of fascists


you wildly over-interpreted my joke
don’t be so grumpy
wow you look great