• marzhall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Probably no other world in the multiverse has warehouses for things which only exist in potentia, but the pork futures warehouse in Ankh-Morpork is a product of the Patrician’s rules about baseless metaphors, the literal-mindedness of citizens who assume that everything must exist somewhere, and the general thinness of the fabric of reality around Ankh, which is so thin that it’s as thin as a very thin thing. The net result is that trading in pork futures—in pork that doesn’t exist yet—led to the building of the warehouse to store it in until it does.

    Terry Pratchett, Thud!

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s so freaking funny. Pratchett was just so good.

      If I recall correctly that’s the same warehouse that later supercools a golem, making him very smart for a bit.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Ah right that makes sense, thanks! Something was nagging at me earlier, about the Golems being hollow and following the paper in their head, so it didn’t make perfect sense. I forgot the trolls were made of rock!

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m going to be that guy and point out that LLM’s are not really “AI”, that’s just the corporate buzzword but “AI” is a loosely defined thing.

    I think we should all get better at calling them LLM’s publicly to take some of the magic woo-woo away.

    • syaochan@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think we should call it with the more appropriate acronym: Systematic Approaches to Learning Algorithms and Machine Inferences (SALAMI)

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      The term “AI” today is almost like the term “computer” decades ago.

      As in, “this new vehicle is more efficient than ever thanks to a new aerodynamic shape created not on the drawing board, but on the computer.”

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      “Big Data”, “Neural Net”, etc etc, they keep changing the buzzword for this crap for the past decade.

      AI just resonates with the public because everyone has seen Terminator movies. Your dipshit CEO of Buttplugs Inc has no clue what an LLM, or neural net is. But he knows what AI is and he delusionally believes it’s going make Buttplug inc. more profitable in the future.

      It’s effective marketing.

      • solomonschuler@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        They call it a machine learning algorithm i call it lossy text compression.

        When you give it a prompt it uncompresses a small portion of the petabytes of zipped information based on the relevance of the keywords you choose. The “generation” comes from approximations of keywords and the underlying prompt. It isn’t “generating” information as much as big tech wants you to believe, its taking information from multiple sources and combining it into one contiguously flowing statement. For people who didn’t understand what I said, generative AI operates similarly by taking 2 paint colors and making a new kind of color from it. It isn’t critical thinking, it’s more of experimenting with no basis, reason, or hypothesis.

        To conclude, the underlying mechanism is a lossy compression algorithm: there is no way to reduce the size from petabytes of information to a sheer 40gb downloadable size besides through lossy compression. The “generative AI” component is analogisly equivalent to making a new color of paint by combining two or more other colored paints. It’s entire existence is through experimentation with no preamtive basis that adding two or more colors would give you a new color. It will never figure that it even after having done the experiment.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, for all the undeserved hype about AI that we and I’m sure plenty of C-suites know about, there is still the issue of fiduciary duty to their bosses (shareholders).

        If you’re a tech CEO that knows it’s all crap, but the market conditions are such that going all-in on AI is going to triple your share price for no good reason, you’ll probably be in a “get that money or we’ll find somebody who will” situation.

        But that’s also why executives get so much of their compensation in the form of stock. There’s no need for shareholders to get off their asses to demand short term gains they can cash in on when the decision makers are one of them and playing the game game.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Right, but in the same spirit, we’re not just talking about LLMs. If we’re being accurate, the common interface we’re used to with ChatGPT or Gemini, they are a system of different models including LLMs and other models for images, or sound.

      If we’re talking AI in movies and music, besides LLMs for writing, we’re mainly concerned with diffusion models

      If we’re talking AI for wearables… That’s usually more on the sensor/classification side of ML, so it’s not even generative.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      i saw my first hover board in back to the future, the pink one. now it’s that overpriced exploding segway.

      at least the name segway was almost creative

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        if hover boards were legit real you’d have so many injuries the company would be sued into insolvency.

        already starting to see this with ebikes… massive increases in head trauma numbers since they became popular. mostly from old people buying a $5000 e bike and then riding it w/o a helmet at 15-20mph.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          if hover boards were legit real you’d have so many injuries the company would be sued into insolvency.

          I’m so sad we’re not seeing this with AI. The injuries we get, the insolvency not so much. Fuck.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Remember when the segway was a mysterious to-be-revealed “it” that we were going to design our cities around in the future?

        I 'member.

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      yes, I’ll call them AI when they are sentient D:

      I was spoiled by Iain Banks’s Culture <3

  • Marinatorres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The frustration is valid, but it’s less ‘AI is dumb’ and more ‘markets chasing hype create weird shortages.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I am salivating over A100/H100 rigs getting dumped en masse. I’ll take one, thanks.

      I hope they don’t just toss them in the garbage, like jerks. Last time this happened with crypto, I think Nvidia bought many back to throw away.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Did GPUs become cheap after the previous hype/bubble simmered down? No, they made even bigger bubble requiring even more resources. They will make it even bigger until it requires toilet paper to sustain, then people will riot.

      • lwuy9v5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Did GPUs become cheap after the previous hype/bubble simmered down? No

        I my current GPU in my gaming PC I got on a big discount, around when folks couldn’t really do bitcoin mining on consumer hardware anymore, so… yes?

      • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        In my time I’ve certainly seen RAM prices rise and fall depending on supply constraints, same with HDD and SSD. Fair point on GPU’s, I just can’t see this data center demand remaining as so much of it seems speculative.

  • DizzoMyNizzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    That haven’t yet happened

    People are going to eat this shit up for sure. At least the corporate companies will. They don’t know better.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Listen, I’m with you, but the reason is hyper capitalist speculative greed. It could be anything we’re talking about “ghee wiz price upon rice hath trippled during these trying times because some bloke in Nippon stamped some papers to offer part of next seasons crops and the king gobbled these up like tendies on a naked lady”

    I mean, credit where credit’s due. This is just their next gang rape horse and the fact that it’s visibly dead for months isn’t really relevant to them. The one that gags first will just get stuck with the bags after the seasonal bukkake festival

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is all just gambling with a bunch of cheaters. They can’t use crypto schemes as much because people FINALLY figured out they were pump and dump scams … so AI investment it is.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    One nitpick: of course the GPUs that don’t have RAM yet wouldn’t be installed in data centers, irrespective of the existence of those data centers.

    The rest of it works: you can have holds on existing RAM/GPUs for buildings that aren’t built yet.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s exaggerated, yes. It’s not gross.

      It’s basically an arms race for a future AI war that probably won’t happen.

      Sort of like how armies were bankrupting themselves building battleships before WW1… which turned out to not be a sea war at all.

      The fear ‘losing out’ on AI is making companies, and people, totally irrational. All the big players are paranoid that one of the other ones is going to ‘get head’ of AI market and become a monopoly, just like it was in the past with Google and search, or Apple and the iphone, etc. So crazy stupid expenditures and these massive data center plans now are considered a necessity.

      But you are correct the AI demand… simple isn’t there and probably won’t materialize and the bubble will collapse.

        • Imadethis@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I do sort of constantly worry about it. What if someone out there isn’t with me and they’re getting a bj? What if it’s not good enough? Have I failed if someone is out there getting a subpar bj, and can I correct the situation somehow?

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sort of like how armies were bankrupting themselves building battleships before WW1

        An interesting little tidbit: in 1912, 52% of Germany’s entire military budget went to the navy. The same navy that spent WWI shelling small coastal villages (killing tens of people) and fleeing from the British navy.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        low exaggeration, imo.

        This is mostly an excuse for extortion right now, making people FOMO for ram instead of Luigi’ing the industry execs. If the AI FOMO demand actually materializes, the next generation cards will actually be far more expensive per flop/gb than older ones. NVIDIA wouldn’t be begging to sell chips to China instead of Americans/colonies, if there was demand.

        It’s all too crazy, but those who FOMO will lose out. AI/LLMs will continue improving, but waiting for oversupply is the right play.

  • julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is how every ramp-up in a market works. It is called hedging. The promised sales volume at that higher price then let companies invest in higher supply.

    The problem here is that none of only four companies which manufacture RAM don‘t want to compete for this demand, but instead share the price increase among each either in profit margins. (This is of course, because they don‘t believe in the AI hype, but nonetheless RAM manufacturing is an oligopoly, which is a problem in of itself.)

    • Tenderizer@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Ramping up supply costs money, and the AI bubble is on the verge of popping. They’d need to know that this demand would be sticking around before investing in higher fab capacity.