cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/55604

New York City's LGBTQ community rises up for the 2025 Pride March - Out In  Jersey media

Photo Credit Corey Saunders

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.

New York City has been ground zero in the fight over Trump’s campaign to scare hospitals into dropping gender-affirming care for trans youth. When Zohran Mamdani ran for mayor, he promised to fight back—showing up to protests outside NYU Langone, pledging $65 million for gender-affirming care, and vowing to use every lever of city power to protect trans New Yorkers from federal intimidation. Since taking office, those promises have largely gone unfulfilled: no enforcement action against the hospitals that shuttered their programs, no fines from the Commission on Human Rights despite complaints open for over a year, and no public accounting of the promised funding. So when Health Commissioner Dr. Alister Martin announced Friday that the city would open its first-ever direct-care clinic for transgender people, it seemed like the administration was finally delivering. It isn’t. This morning, Erin in the Morning can confirm that Mayor Mamdani’s new clinic will deny care to anyone under 19 years of age—adopting the exact age cutoff from Trump’s anti-trans executive orders.

"Transgender, gender-nonconfirming, and nonbinary New Yorkers deserve age-appropriate health care that is affirming, respectful, and considerate of all their needs. That’s why, for the first time later this summer, the NYC Health Department will be expanding services to provide gender affirming hormone therapy to adults 19 years of age and older at our Corona Sexual Health Clinic. As with the other clinic services, gender-affirming hormone therapy will be offered at no to low cost and regardless of immigration status. We look forward sharing more details upon launching the pilot,” said a NYC health Spokesperson in a statement to Erin In The Morning.

The confirmation comes after a city council budget hearing on Friday, where the exchange that first surfaced the clinic also revealed the administration’s reasoning. Councilmember Tiffany Cabán asked Commissioner Alister Martin—the city’s top public health official, appointed by Mamdani in January—whether the city would be expanding gender-affirming care. Martin announced the direct-care clinic, calling it “one of the first times a public health department has ever taken that step.” But when Cabán pushed back, pointing out that trans youth are the ones most under attack right now—noting that there are “almost no providers” left for youth the entire city—Martin indicated the clinic would not serve youth, citing the need to “strike a balance” between providing care and avoiding “clawbacks from the federal government.” This morning, EITM can directly confirm that the age cutoff is 19—matching the Trump administration’s executive order threshold, not the standard legal age of adulthood in New York. See the exchange:

Commissioner Alister Martin: “It’s incredibly important that we get the messaging right here and that we lean in on the comms and the campaign here, but it’s also important to deliver for people and to provide the services they need. And we’re excited to say that pretty soon we’re going to be able to offer gender-affirming care directly at our clinics. We have a clinic that will be opening up in Corona which will offer gender-affirming hormone therapy for adults. It’s like one of the first times a public health department has ever taken that step, and we’re proud to not just stop there. We’ll continue moving forward with this.”

Councilmember Tiffany Cabán: “Can I ask a follow-up on that? Particularly because that’s a really big deal, but also—we’re seeing this devastating decrease in services for youth, and especially youth under 13, 12—like, there are almost no providers who provide that care. And the one or two that do is obviously under attack from the federal government. So is there going to—are you thinking about an expansion in that youth care? Because I’m talking to parents all the time and they don’t know where to take their children.”

Commissioner Martin: “As you can appreciate, the balance that we have to strike is—we are committed to this issue and want to make sure that we provide the services and resources for youth, as well as making sure that we don’t expose ourselves to clawbacks from the federal government, which disrupt the rest of the care that we can give. And so there’s much more to come on this, trying to sort of figure out that right balance. We’re eager to work with you on this, but rest assured we are working on this and we’re trying to figure out how to do this.”

The news comes amid mounting questions about Mamdani’s commitment to the promises that helped elect him. During his campaign, Mamdani held a Trans Community Town Hall where pledged to invest $65 million in gender-affirming care. That pledge involved “public hospitals and community clinics,” indicating to many that he could begin opening direct care clinics for youth being forced out of hospitals. His platform also explicitly pledged to hold the hospitals that deny transgender youth care accountable for their capitulation to Trump and to “use every single tool” to stop them from complying with Trump’s illegal executive orders.

Those pledges have largely evaporated. Journalist Aviva Stahl reported for Prism in March that the $65 million was nowhere in the city’s preliminary budget, and as of June, advocates who reviewed the executive budget say the money is still not there. The Commission on Human Rights complaints against NYU Langone and Mount Sinai have sat open for over a year with no enforcement action, and the agency has refused to comment on them in response to questions by Erin In The Morning. And now, Mamdani’s own health commissioner is using the very same rationale NYU Langone and Mount Sinai used to deny trans youth care—fear of federal retaliation.

It is a far cry from when Mamdani stood at a rally outside NYU Langone in March 2025 and declared: “We have seen NYU Langone comply with illegal executive orders out of a fear of their so-called biggest donors. Let us remind them that the city is also one of their biggest donors. Let us remind them that they do not pay a dollar in property tax, [and that] we are a city that is ready to use every single tool to assure compliance with city and state human rights laws.”

Mamdani is not powerless here. He has significant leverage over Health + Hospitals—the largest public municipal healthcare system in the country, with 11 hospitals, more than 70 clinics, and eight existing Pride Health Centers. He controls the board. He can demand H+H absorb displaced trans youth patients tomorrow, with significant power behind those demands. He has the Commission on Human Rights, which can levy fines of up to $250,000 per violation against hospitals that deny care in violation of city law—complaints against NYU Langone and Mount Sinai have been open for over a year with no action. He has a campaign pledge to coordinate with AG James, who has already told NYU Langone that no federal law requires them to stop. He also promised $65 million to this community. The tools are there. The legal authority is there. The money was promised. What is apparently missing is the will to use any of it for the kids who are the most under attack.

It is important to note that in a recent appearance on WNYC’s Brian Lehrer Show, a parent of a trans child asked Mamdani directly what his administration is doing for her kid. Mamdani cited a $15 million investment in gender-affirming care over two years. But there are virtually no public details on what the $15 million funds, which agency controls it, which patients it serves, or when it will go into effect. And two days after that interview, Commissioner Martin announced a new clinic that would be adults only, using Trump’s executive order age cutoff of 19, and told the city council that the city was afraid of federal “clawbacks”—raising the question of what, exactly, the $15 million “unlocks” for trans youth if the administration’s own policy for a new clinic is to avoid serving them. EITM has reached out to multiple NYC agencies and press contacts for the mayor’s office and has received no response on whether the adults-only clinic is intended to be part of the $15 million pledge—which is also, notably, a fraction of the $65 million Mamdani campaigned on, and which, as of today, does not serve youth.

Opening a city-run gender-affirming care clinic is, on its own, a meaningful step. But when the clinic adopts the Trump administration’s age cutoff, when the health commissioner cites the same federal fears as the private hospitals the mayor protested against, and when the promised $65 million remains unaccounted for while trans kids in the largest city in America are told there is almost nowhere left for them to go, the step is as likely to be seen as a betrayal as it is a meaningful advancement of his promises.

Erin In The Morning is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a subscriber.


From Erin In The Morning via This RSS Feed.

  • SerialExperimentsGay [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Letting down trans youth is obviously the worst part of this, but i’m really sceptical about this in general. Another clinic offering “HRT at no to low cost, regardless of immigration status” is obviously not a bad thing, but HRT is the one part of trans healthcare that we have already figured out to provide on our own when it is withheld from us. Any healthcare policy that values trans rights needs to provide the stuff that we need official providers for, like free hair removal, mastectomies and bottom surgeries at the bare minimum.

    Besides that, i am highly sceptical of any model centralizing gender affirming care in a tiny number of specialized clinics, that results in dangerously long wait lists anywhere it is implemented, whether we’re talking the UK as the worst case or otherwise largely trans friendly places like the Netherlands or Denmark. It just always creates bottlenecks because such approaches are never set up in a way that is scaled to a realistic demand.

    Edit: Reading the entire article, this seems even more dire. They flatout refuse to challenge Trump’s attempt to murder trans kids and do some window dressing to distract from this. Wer hat uns verraten? Sozialdemokraten!

    • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Westoid libs love to portray China as some sort of hellscape for trans and queer people in general, and yet China opens gender affirming care clinics for trans kids, while those same libs campaign on being “allies” before throwing them under the bus.

    • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      critiques like this are in a weird place for me because the disappointment comes from a good thing done poorly, and the criticism wouldn’t exist if they didn’t try to have this clinic in the first place.

      on the other hand i don’t see any reason they’re compromising on this. it’s not some funding deal with the governor, it’s not getting anyone out of ICE custody.

      trying to have a clinic is good, being unwilling or unable to do it the right way is a perfect example of how elections aren’t revolutionary

      • inTheShadowOf [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I reject this notion entirely, because throwing vulnerable trans people under the bus is a line I won’t cross. The attacks on trans youth have been getting worse than ever and this “cis ally” opens a clinic that accepts the reactionary talking point that trans care starts at adulthood. So many people have uniformed, sensationalist views on trans youth. We need allies to stand with the community even when it’s difficult.

        I’m reminded of the time Zorhan said Cuba and Venezuela were run by “dictators.” At a time when solidarity was needed more than ever, he accepted western talking points. This type of compromise isn’t new for him.

        Would Cuomo make a clinic? I don’t really care.

        • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I agree in theory. Yes, Zohran should do better. It’s just that I can’t practice politics with an “all or nothing” mentality and expect to keep my sanity.

          So I will appreciate what we are getting, remember the other guy would have given us nothing, and push for more and better. Otherwise you’re never getting even a portion of what you want.

          This is messy and if I’m reading the reasoning correctly the Trump feds would probably bring in troops or ICE or something to abduct Trans kids. Zohran is still operating in a political environment where the federal government is completely against him and has to push the agenda while also protecting the city from federal attacks.

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It can’t, and that’s why the constant dem entryism from ostensible “leftists” is so disappointing. He ran as a democrat, he will keep doing democrat things. That’s why they accepted him and why they didn’t just overturn the primary result (as has been established is their right), because they know he will serve the interests of the moneyed classes.

  • StarkWolf [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    we are committed to this issue and want to make sure that we provide the services and resources for youth, as well as making sure that we don’t expose ourselves to clawbacks from the federal government… …trying to sort of figure out that right balance.

    “It’s difficult to find the right balance between actually doing something, something which we promised to do, that our constituents are pleading with us to do, and was one of the fundamental pillars of the support that got our administration elected, and is entirely within our power and legal rights to do, vs. doing absolutely nothing, not pushing back at all, and giving in completely. Right now we think the appropriate way to balance these two sides is to do absolutely nothing, not push back at all, and giving in completely. We hope you understand our commitment to telling you that we are committed to this issue.”

  • none [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    Commissioner Alister Martin: “It’s incredibly important that we get the messaging right here and that we lean in on the comms and the campaign here

    “We will spread lies and confusion.”

    A couple of weeks ago in CO the SC ruled you can’t discriminate due to cowardice:

    The court found that the actual harm to transgender youth far outweighed the hospital’s speculative fears

    holding that a “reluctant” act of discrimination compelled by a “third party” remains discrimination under Colorado law. With the decision, Children’s Hospital Colorado joins a growing number of hospitals, including Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego and Children’s Minnesota, that have moved to restore gender-affirming care after initially halting it under federal pressure. The ruling also answers the question many public officials have been grappling with in terms of state anti-discrimination law: whether vague federal threats, unaccompanied by any law or court order, are enough to nullify a state’s civil rights protections. The Colorado Supreme Court’s answer was firmly: no.

    It’s different because it concerns stopping an existing program instead of starting a new one.

    However if the administration has directly stated their reason is fear of federal retribution via other funding, then they have supplied evidence of discrimination.

    • Ildsaye [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s the foot in the door to attack the concept of self-determination for adults, and probably also to ultimately attack actual protections afforded to minors as well. Naturally, it’s piloted on the least defended first.

  • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    entryism is a very reasonable strategy and encouraging people to vote for “left wing” democrats will result in better outcomes rather than dragging voters right when the politician inevitably shifts to be more aligned with the party

    it isn’t at all a way to realign potentially reachable people to mainstream politics