oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]

  • 80 Posts
  • 2.03K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 21st, 2023

help-circle


























  • I don’t know about reticulum but I wonder if you could (in theory, I’m sure it doesn’t exist yet) have a semi-dumb node that can make basic routing decisions without implementing all the heavy stuff like crypto. because honestly there’s plenty of compute available on a lot of these meshtastic devices for something like that, tracking node lists and at least a local route table, but not for running the whole stack

    They’re working on a C implementation to basically that, but it’s not very closed to being finished yet. Reticulum is all Python now, which doesn’t work great on microcontrollers. It’s like this with a lot of mesh projects, where they have grand plans with awesome features, but stuff goes slowly thanks to a lack of developers.

    running encrypted comms over anything ham would be illegal

    Yeah, sadly. In America you could buy a license for a business band, those are right near the HAM bands and generally allow encryption, but the convenience drops off a cliff (at least several hundred dollars). Or you could move to a cool country without those restrictions.




  • you can’t, because reticulum isn’t LoRa focused, the reticulum node is the computer/phone. There’s a bunch of other interfaces it can transmit over, like AX.25 (HAM radio, really only useful in EU), serial, Tor, I2P, the internet, and more.

    also, since the processing is done on a more powerful chip, it means that it has significantly more efficient routing than Meshtastic. Meshtastic doesn’t pick a path, it does flood routing where it has everyone retransmit, while reticulum only transmits as much as it needs to.

    (well, you could have a dumb LoRa repeater, but that wouldn’t really reticulum, even if it could extend the range of reticulum broadcasts)