(Preferably with sources)

I’ve overcorrected from “China bad” to “China is infallible.” I know that’s incorrect, but it’s hard to decipher US propaganda from actual issues.

In discussions in the past, providing a positive counterpoint is plenty, but since more folks are already realizing the narrative about China is incorrect I would like to have more nuanced discussions where I can present both praise and criticism. I think it’s also important that we don’t end up in a USSR situation where Communism is synonymous with the actions of a single country.

  • I know they’re trading with the genocidal zionist entity. Even if their policy is to be apolitical, that’s very bad.
  • I’m unsure of what the internal restrictions look like in general
  • I saw that the “social credit score” was a small experiment in one province that got way overblown
  • Great firewall…? I know it’s a thing, iiuc you can use a VPN to get around it, but only ones provided by the state (which could easily backdoor them)?
  • Limitations on speech? Do people get disappeared?
  • Are they monitoring everyone? “You can’t monitor 1.5 billion people” idk computers are pretty fast. Also you can def use big data to find the people you do need to monitor more closely
  • Dengism? Reintroducing capitalism looks like a retreat at face value and has the obvious problems of capitalism, but I saw someone on here talking about it being a genius way of deindustrializing capitalist nations while building China’s own capacity

Are there others? I’m happy if you also include justification for their policies, but I do want to know where you genuinely think they’re making mistakes.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

  • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    i don’t think it would too harsh to point out that China has more or less abandoned the idea of proletarian internationalism. i can see why they did it but i don’t think it should be above criticism

  • ourtimewillcome [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    20 days ago

    from the sino-soviet split onwards, china has consistently given material support to pretty much every regressive and reactionary force there was during the cold war, including but not limited to khmer rouge, the nicaraguan contras, the laotian anti-communists, the unita puppets of apartheid south africa, the afghan reactionary drug lords, the régime of siaad barre, the pro-israeli forces of the traitor saad haddad in lebanon, the greek military hunta, the dictatorships of augusto pinochet in chile and yahya khan in pakistan and many, many more.

    chinese media covering the illegal and undemocratic dissolution of the soviet union never misses to highlight the various real and imagined problems within the late soviet system. never does it however lose a word about the fact, that chinese foreign and domestic policy was a major contributing factor to the defeats the communist movement suffered during the late 80s and early 90s

  • CliffordBigRedDog [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    21 days ago

    They could show more solidarity with anti-imperialist movements all around the world, stop trading with the zionists for example

    Also they need to curb public smoking

    2 issues of equal importance

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      i bet that the soviets set an example that showed the world what happens if you expend significant resources and effort in intervening to help anti-imperialist movements – the epstein oligarchy controlled global north will spend any amount to draw you in further.

      besides fully captured western media has created brainwormed westerners to the degree such that they will never allow help to come from china; help can only come from within now. either that or climate change kicking our collective asses into accepting help.

  • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    20 days ago

    Drug policy. The war on drugs is bad. It’s bad when America does it, it’s bad when China does it.

    I understand the history, in particular regarding opium. That doesn’t make it acceptable in a modern context, the opium wars don’t justify draconian policies on weed in 2026. Especially given that tobacco use is so prevalent while tobacco is more harmful than many other drugs.

    • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah also alcohol, arguably the most overall destructive drug in human history. Drug prohibition is 99% just cultural brainworms all over the world.

          • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 days ago

            I guess but when I think of drug policy brain worms I think of “the US criminalized drugs because of racism” which is much different than “China criminalized drugs because of a widespread colonial campaign to get chinese people addicted to drugs”

            • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 days ago

              Sure it’s different and you can (and should) say one is more understandable than the other but neither are really rational. I’m obviously not going to campaign in China for them to legalize weed or whatever but I can’t really say it’s a good idea to be so repressive.

    • jackmaoist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 days ago

      America’s war on drugs was a campaign to imprison and enslave minorities. China’s war on drugs is nowhere as bad. Although they should relax restrictions on less harmful drugs.

  • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    21 days ago

    Great firewall…? I know it’s a thing, iiuc you can use a VPN to get around it, but only ones provided by the state (which could easily backdoor them)?

    I used the same Mullvad VPN I use in the US the whole time I was there, it worked fine. The real purpose of the “great firewall” isn’t keeping people in, it’s keeping western tech companies (facebook, google, etc) out so that Chinese companies can fill those niches.

  • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    20 days ago

    As a general response to this, consider that they don’t claim to be infallible. Regarding Xinjiang, for example, the CPC to my knowledge openly acknowledges their part in the development of poor material conditions in the region that ultimately was a major driver in the terrorism problem of the early 21st century.

    One child policy was also IMO a pretty appalling piece of legislation, although that’s a situation where I have to concede there really was a problem that needed to be solved and I wasn’t there and am not an expert, so…

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    20 days ago

    I think the comments here have covered the big ones like foreign policy, Sino-Soviet split, etc very well. So I’ll mention that the reform and opening up period has a lot of issues that I personally see as right deviationism, even through the lens of developing productive forces and integrating with the world economy by allowing limited capitalist relations. Specifically, dismantling communal farms, and dismantling welfare systems like the iron rice bowl. The state there does step in to manage things like healthcare costs, housing etc, but frankly a workers’ state should always be able to guarantee the basic needs of life to the workers, and privatizing these resources into the hands of capitalists only restricts access and commodifies them.

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    21 days ago

    The social credit score thing was mostly a way of policing small businesses, not private citizens.

    The great firewall is overwhelmingly justified on the basis that it’s better for China to have its own social media sites, etc. and it’s not like people in China are in any way incapable of accessing the outside internet anyway, and people absolutely do get “illegal” VPNs without punishment.

    They are too censorious on their intranet but people overblown it because gommunism 1984.

    Do people literally ever get disappeared? Surely so, but every time someone doesn’t appear in public for a few days in China that means they were “disappeared” according to liberal news, the same way people in the DPRK die and come back to life.

    They functionally do monitor everyone (sort of), and they do this by basically the same means as any other even semi-advanced country does this.

    There are other common complaints that have merit, like repression (not genocide) in Xinjiang, but of course it gets mischaracterized as worse than it was, as genocide, and also isn’t given the context of being in response to a serious terrorism issue that does not justify the repression but makes it more comprehensible as them failing to figure out a better way to fight imported terrorist ideology that was mainly resulting in Uighurs getting massacred rather than the CPC just doing ethnic persecution because idk they were bored and just hate this specific group of Muslims.

    You will get endless defenses on here of Deng and subsequent, uh, let’s call them pro-market factions. If you want to get criticisms of this, you can for example read the old posts from @xiaohongshu@hexbear.net, who I think has been banned for a while but for unrelated reasons. As they note, China is moving in a relatively more positive direction on this matter under Xi, but that’s relative and the other comparison point was a time where the revisionism was so comically crass that people were trying to figure out how to smuggle Austrian Economics in with Marxist vocabulary.

    • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      The social credit score thing was mostly a way of policing small businesses, not private citizens.

      in the West, only businesses are considered people.

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      20 days ago

      It is a bad look in the short run

      Let’s not minimise complicity in genocide to “a bad look in the short run”. Is china more complicit than most of the rest of the world? No. Are they in fact significantly less complicit than much of the world? Yes. But it’s still an ongoing genocide.

      • Rylo@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        Oh 100%, I wrote this lazily but I didn’t mean that I personally agree with all of these. I am very much for military intervention and the forced destruction of the Zionist state.

        I was mostly trying to convey their current M.O of “working & trading with everyone regardless of where they stand”. Obviously Chinese leadership has a different take than many of us…

    • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      21 days ago

      everyone in China is heavily monitored

      Coming from places like the UK with the most CCTV cameras per square foot, and the US where the PATRIOT Act is more invasive than anything China is proven to do to its citizens

    • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      It is a bad look in the short run yes, in the long run the stability is considered necessary to develop the productive forces and multipolarity

      Yeah no. You are being racist by attempting to legitimize any support for genocide. Honestly self crit.

      If anyone really needs to give any support to genocide for their long term goals, humanity doesn’t need them and they can go and die. I’m convinced, that China is making an honest mistake here. That’s why I still support China! If I ever became convinced, they needed to support “Israel”, for real material reasons, I would cease any support of China, critical or other. In fact I would support any reasonable effort against China, just like any effort against the West.

    • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 days ago

      Imagine your family and everyone you love being brutally tortured and murdered and someone telling you they need to make profitable business with the murderer and enable them for some nebulous long term goals. Ever heard of “internationalism”?

    • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 days ago

      Lol. This is just silly.

      I mean they appear to have shut up Naomi Wu for example and that wasn’t for instigating regime change exactly. Of course her followers trying to bait her into inflammatory statements didn’t help.

    • Athena5898 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      I know VPNs are not forbidden because of the user over in .ml from China uses one and taught me about the firewall. Wish I was better at names their avatar looks like someone on a tiny car?

  • moss_icon [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    20 days ago

    Their support of the Khmer Rouge is a genuine stain on their legacy.

    Their immigration policies are way too fucking strict.

    I’ve heard homophobia can be issue among Chinese people too.

    • CliffordBigRedDog [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 days ago

      Their support of the Khmer Rouge is a genuine stain on their legacy.

      its telling that the worst thing china ever did was to play along with american foreign policy objectives

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        20 days ago

        the worst thing china ever did was to play along with american foreign policy objectives

        Eh, it was a bit more than that considering they invaded Vietnam afterwards. It was more of a play against the Soviet Union’s growing influence in the area than it was playing along with American foreign policy objectives.

  • China daily just recently posted a video depicting Filipinos as monkey’s getting duped by Japan and the USA.

    While the overall idea of the message may or may not hold water, I think it’s an issue to show state owned media (or any media for that matter) to post videos depicting one group of people as monkey’s and having everyone else be people. Suffice to say, they might be pretty chill on racism sometimes.

    (I’m not super familiar with this situation and it is developing)

  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Censoring queer relationships in media is reactionary and does not befit a modern socialist state. LGBT+ representation and acceptance has grown over the years in China, especially among young people. More queer content creators have popped up as a result, but because of these dumb restrictions some content has to be toned down or shared on Western social media instead. There’s a bunch of interesting Chinese queer TV shows, from BLs to lesbian dating shows that seem to get around the censorship issue by moving production to another country, like for example Thailand. (has Visa free travel for Chinese citizens)

    This shit has also made it so much more difficult to talk to the average queer liberal in the West about China. If you’re in a vacuum, and all you read in the media is le evul SeeSeePee censoring yet another piece of gay content, you get the impression that it must be some sort of oppressive hellscape where queer people have to hide underground for fear of being hunted down by Xi himself. coming-to-xi-you

    In reality, there’s a vibrant queer culture in the country, especially in major cities like Chengdu (often called the gay capital of China) and Chongqing. Plenty of gay bars and people being openly queer. Also a huge furry culture. An acquaintance of mine who regularly visits China for business, always brings up up how he feels much safer as an openly gay guy in China, because of the low crime rate and not having to worry about some random homophobe assaulting him when walking alone at night. There’s a cultural aspect to it as well. Older people tend be less progressive, but they generally consider it someone else’s private matter and none of their business. I guess it also helps when the people ruling the country have better things to do than blame queer people for every problem.

    All that is not to say that China hasn’t made any progress in that area over the years. A few years ago they even began opening gender clinics for trans kids. Courts have also repeatedly sided with queer people in various cases and considers them protected under Chinese law. But the laws regarding LGBT+, whether it’s codified protections, marriage rights, etc. are behind the times and should be modernized. If other socialist countries like Cuba and Vietnam can shift to embracing queer rights, then so can the PRC. Especially with China’s ascendancy as the new superpower, this would be a major win for queer people worldwide.

    • RondoRevolution [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 days ago

      I completely share your grievances. I remember a few years ago when Naomi Wu was still posting on Twitter, where she talked about a recent, at the time, hate crime against two lesbians that were not reported properly in China as the hate crime that it was, save from the place where it happened where it was actually being reported correctly. I still remember the footage of the aggressor stabbing them both, that shit was horrifying.

      I was still a lib at the time and I didn’t search further, so I don’t know what came of it, but I hope that’s something that have been addressed ever since and that the killer got what he deserved.

  • Feed_el_Castro [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 days ago

    My opinion is that China has a history of trouble during quick changes (cultural revolution, great leap forward, dengism) that made the CPC rather slow and momentuous, so it takes longer than it (IMO) should to react to many things.

    China should have fully embraced and promoted local development of queer and feminist ideas long ago, through they’re slowly moving in that direction.

    China should have realized that the extent to which market socialism is useful is reaching its limits once the west has been made dependent and deindustrialized, and it should transition towards a democratically planned economy and reject neoliberal economic theory. They may be slowly moving towards Modern Monetary Theory but they should be moving much quicker.

    China should realize that it’s already in a cold war situation with the US and it needs to rapidly develop and refine its soft and hard power projection to contend against the increasingly hostile NATO, and it’s slowly reacting but should be moving much quicker.

    Ultimately, China is a Marxist dictatorship of the proletariat and it tends to reach the correct conclusions, but it has a bit too much inertia and could seriously benefit itself and worker internationalism by adopting stronger and faster policy.