QatarEnergy, the world’s largest producer of natural gas, just got bombed.

  • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    Good. Fuck being dependent on dictators for our energy. Renewables is the only way forward. European energy for Europeans.

  • CanadaPlus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Y’know, usually the markets price things in well before they happened, but there was a whole lot of hopium this time that somehow a large-scale Middle Eastern war would not effect fossil fuel production and shipping.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Economy is imploding because people don’t want to pick between switching to green energy and not murdering brown people.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No no. People want MORE fossil fuel related wars. But without having to give up on fossil fuels while those wars happen.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not really the issue at hand, but sure. This is less about getting to kill brown people than about Iranians. And their government lacks public support and is not just willing to do mass killings in the streets and executions to maintain their grip on power but is actually doing that too.

      The civilian death toll is probably going to be much lower than in the January protests. But that does not mean that a military intervention is right or resolves the participants from doing nation building afterward.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Unfortunately, we don’t, because those take a long time to build and we keep putting it off.

      And the other option requires batteries that take a long time to make, and we only just started on that.

      Edit: why am I getting downvoted for complaining about how pretty much every western government isnt doing enough to transition to other power sources?

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Nah. All it takes is investment and commitment to treating electricity like a utility beyond the profit imperative. Look at what China is doing with sodium-ion batteries.

      • chux@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        A more modern and interconnected grid would do a lot already and greatly reduce the demand for batteries. There are many things one can do. But you are right in the sense that they are largely not done. That doesnt mean there exists no way though. We know how to do it but we dont.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        ‘Nuclear takes too long to build’ has been an argument against nuclear for several times longer than it takes to build even the most stringently safe nuclear power plant… its depressing.

      • kaprap@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What do you mean you don’t? Has everything I heard in Cuba, China and Africa been a lie?

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          China is building a load of nuclear plants, it’s working very well for them and moving very quickly. They’re also building numerous solar farms and coal plants because they need whatever they can get.

          Many places in Africa are doing great on Solar power, but they have requirements orders of magnitude lower than most western countries.

          I don’t know much about Cuba.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It seems to me that every major conflict (Russia, Middle East) spikes oil prices, relatively unpredictably (if you can call this unpredictable).

    Maybe the world should look for alternative sources of energy, which are abundant, cheap, and can be deployed non centrally?

    No. No that’s insane.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Whatever comes next I‘m prepared to be deeply disappointed by my government and our European partners on this. „Make gas cheaper“ is probably at the very top of every leader‘s to do list tomorrow.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, but power sources that don’t spew fumes are for limp-wristed queers. /s

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There’s really nothing wrong with generating hydrogen when power costs are negative.

          Except that only happens like 500 hours a year.

          And hydrogen will leak from any tank.

          And it turns metal brittle.

          And I wouldn’t trust my neighbor with a propane tank, let alone hydrogen.

          And its nearly impossible to transport through existing infrastructure.

          But other than that, its great!

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            You forgot about the part where the possibility of generating hydrogen cleanly from electricity later is used as an excuse to build infrastructure and fuel-cell cars for it now, even though hydrogen now is dirty hydrogen produced by cracking fossil fuels.

            I have no confidence that the second phase of switching to electrolysis would actually happen, and that “the hydrogen economy” isn’t just a greenwashing scam perpetrated by natural gas producers.

        • runblack@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I always love the stupidity of this idea: You were able to generate pure hydrogen at high costs… Now what should we do with it? Well lets just do what we did since the middle ages and burn it!

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Well, there are useful appliances for hydrogen, where you just burn it. Burning it to heat your own home isnt one if them.

            • CanadaPlus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              If you’re launching a rocket, sure. If cost or difficulty matters in any way compared to raw mass, not really.

              It was talked about for cars where density kinda matters, but you could put them in a fuel cell that way instead of just burning it, and I’m not sure if it was ever anywhere close to economical.

              The cost probably will go down, and with any luck the cost of polluting will go up, but electricity is going to be more practical for most things.

  • Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 hours ago

    And the German government wants to end the sales ban for gas boilers. 55% of German gas consumption is used to heat buildings. So this is a key part of reducing consumption. Another case of a conservative government hurting Germany badly.

    • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m laughing because I went with Habeck’s advice and installed a simple heat exchanger in my house that is hooked up to a centralized community heating system that runs on sustainable heat sources. Because Habeck, imperfect as he may have been, had a realistic view on things that was rooted in scientific data.

      Fuck the CDU and fuck the SPD, fucking class-traitor scumbags.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    15 hours ago

    We buy the much more expensive US fracking gas. That spike is a minor blip to Europe.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I‘ve read the world just lost about 20% of the total supply with that facility. Supply chains are in shambles everywhere.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      The European Commission has a website listing the top gas suppliers to Europe
      https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/where-does-the-eu-s-gas-come-from/

      Our main suppliers are, as of 2025:

      • Norway - 31.1%
      • United States - 25.4%
      • Russia - 13.1%
      • North Africa - 12.8%
      • United Kingdom - 4.3%
      • Qatar - 3.8%

      While Qatar doesn’t provide a huge proportion of European gas, it’s not insignificant either. A disruption in the supply of Qatari gas could very easily cause prices to go up by a lot.

      Edit: It’s almost as if we should do everything in our power to rid ourselves of the dependency on fossil fuels.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Also not the 13.1% Russian share. This is the last year Russian LNG imports are allowed and imports using short term contracts are banned in two months.

        • optional@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          At full capacity (10GW), the island is expected to produce around 1 million tonnes of green hydrogen, corresponding to roughly 7% of Europe’s expected hydrogen demand

          10GW = 87.6 TWh / year (even assuming 100% efficiency of the P2G process). That’s 10% of Germanys gas consumption of last year (864TWh). The EU consumes something like 5000TWh per year.

          So while this might be a cool project and a much needed one, it’s not nearly enough to replace our gas imports. We should really stop using gas to heat our homes and use the miniscule amount of green gas we can produce for the processes that really require it.

          In other news: Our (German) government wants to go back to gas heating and combustion engines, hoping to find some e-fuels in the attic.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not just about where european countries buy, there’s a global market, it’s about who bought gas from Qatar and where they will buy their gas now. AFAIK Qatar exports a lot to asian countries, if they can’t get gas from Qatar anymore they’re going to buy from other countries, for example from the USA. That’s going to raise the price for US fracking gas and will affect Europe.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.iobanned_from_community_badge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Too many innocent people will be affected by this so I can’t say “leopards eating face” without reservations, but still, those leopards will be eating good tonight.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In democracies there are no innocent people. Everybody is complicit in not shifting energy sources since the 1970ies.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Including them. They can feel less guilty, but democracy means that the people decide and they are part of the people.

          If they don’t agree with the vote they have to look for means to convince the rest and change the vote.

          • CanadaPlus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            At first that was WTF, but you know, now I’m seeing it.

            I’d extend that to dictatorships and autocracies as well, since autocrats only have the power people around them give. The thing is, we’re all guilty, so kind of nobody is.

              • CanadaPlus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                All people, even, since borders are themselves something that only exist because we acknowledge them. Appropriate username for that.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Then it’s a dumb take that you are responsible since 1970.

          But since you have been an adult, as a member of a democracy, you are responsible for what the democracy does. That’s the deal. The election decides. If the majority decides something bad, bad luck, that’s still shared among everybody.