• EstraDoll [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11422 days ago

    smug

    too long

    doesn’t answer the question

    highly pedantic

    extremely condescending

    could it get any more “quora” than this?

    • @daniyeg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      922 days ago

      he probably takes pride in the fact that he knows semicolons … exist. i bet he writes exclusively in cursive.

  • BobDole [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4622 days ago

    Polymath

    What a nerd. I can do multiple kinds of maths too but you don’t see me making up words and bragging about it

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3822 days ago

      Love 2 ask people online for help only to get some smug smartass telling me to suck shit and the next reply is an AI telling me it’s safe to drink bleach.

  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3422 days ago

    I wish these absolute losers would just say “haha wat r u gay” instead of this elaborate fedora dance, but they are allergic to simplifying absolutely anything they say because doing so would reveal how mud-fucking simple their thoughts and opinions are, and we can’t have that if we’re gonna be an august man of letters can we?

  • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3322 days ago

    At least almost everybody calling themselves a ‘polymath’ is just a bullshitter.
    Today, humanity’s collective knowledge about so many things is too deep to actually get in-depth into multiple topics. Hell, you can encounter mathematicians claiming that two mathematicians who study different branches might as well be speaking different languages to each other.

    • silent_water [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2922 days ago

      it’s worse than different languages. they use the same words to mean entirely different things. so you can say stuff from the same lexicon that means entirely different things to different mathematicians. there are supposed to be analogies that help you translate but jfc I swear to god if I hear one more definition of compactness I’m going to cry. no I’m not going to learn more category theory to understand how I can use a sheaf to translate the different notions because that also doesn’t mean what I think it means. shut up shut up shut up words mean things. next you’re going to tell me red is blue because color theory staaaahp

      self-teaching math is a pain in the ass

      • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        but jfc I swear to god if I hear one more definition of compactness I’m going to cry

        Huh. I’m only familiar with the ones that are equivalent to what you would learn in a general topology textbook/course almost right away, i.e. a compact space is a topological space, such that every open cover of the space contains as a subset a finite open subcover of the space. What other ones can you share?

        EDIT: forgot a word. Not thinking great right now.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          922 days ago

          they’re supposed to all be versions of that one, it’s just not always very easy to see how - joke was mainly about that. category theory calls things compact if they’re “small” in a very particular sense. algebraic compactness also has nothing to do with the topological notion, at least on the surface (abelian group that’s a direct summand of every group containing it as a pure subgroup). basically, every area of math where the topological notion makes no sense will invariably call something compact eventually, because mathematicians can’t resist.

          sometimes if you squint you can see how it relates back to the topological notion but frequently it’s anything but obvious if you don’t already understand the field - which means when you’re trying to work things out for yourself, you just have to treat it like one more definition of the same word until you finally get it one day.

          I think it’s easier if you have a prof who can just make the analogy clear from the start.

    • radiofreeval [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      922 days ago

      The only people close to polymaths in the modern day are white collar professionals who get disillusioned with their field and switch to another later in life because they have the comfort to do so. Every once in a while you see engineers go back to school and become lawyers, lawyers become doctors or things like that. At minimum you are only getting “polymath” status in your forties and you probably aren’t unemployed and a writer.

  • JayTwo [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2322 days ago

    I miss Yahoo Answers.
    It was just straight up transparently stupid.