Can a north Korean speak out about government abuse? What about a south Korean? We both know the answers to that.

Going to mention right away that Occupied Koreans speaking well of the DPRK can be punished by law.
But also, given that people in the DPRK are not under the sort of government-induced oppression that the colonial government of the Occupied Korea forces its people to endure, like prevention of access to housing and healthcare, one has to ask, ‘what good is supposedly being able to speak about “government abuse” if it’s just going to be ignored’? (And that’s assuming that the presupposition about speech under the colonial government of the Chaebol Republic is true.)

Also, I recommend you google things like ‘Park Dictatorship’, as you are probably unaware of things like that

A classic tankie tactic is to talk about their atrocities as if there was no other choice.

‘Atrocities’ like ‘guaranteed housing’, ‘guaranteed access to healthcare’, ‘guaranteed education’, ‘massive increases in life expectancy and literacy rates’, ‘giving women basic rights’, ‘fighting against colonialism’.

Can you say a single thing bad about China or North Korea? Just 1 maybe 2 if you’re hardcore?

Not the person that you were responding to, but I can and do.
Why are you so preoccupied with victims of colonialism, though, and why are you presenting them as even remotely as bad as NATO? And how do you think the rest of the world should be resisting NATO’s colonial yoke? What ‘bad things’ do you think people should be saying about either of the relevant countries/states.
It sounds awfully like you live in NATO, and that you like being a beneficiary of colonialism, and that you uncritically believe the same people who justify genocides and invasions with stuff like ‘Iraq has WMDs!’

I generally spend more time talking about the problems of the west but the fact that tankies see no evil just makes me look at you the same as a dogmatic MAGA and I don’t want that on my feed either.

Resisting colonialism is not evil.

I opose authoritarianism.

It looks awfully like you engage in consent-manufacturing for colonialism, and that you uncritically believe things like ‘Iraq has WMDs!’/‘Iran has nukes!’/‘in the DPRK everybody has to have the same haircut, but also everybody is punished for having that haircut!’
If you think that opposing colonialism is ‘authoritarianism’ and, therefore, bad, but engaging in colonialism is somehow not authoritarian, then you are very silly.

I spend more time calling out western authoritarianism than eastern, and I see most western anarchists do the same.

Not the person you were initially replying to, but the sort of anarchists who are in favour of European (‘western’) colonial governments in Occupied Korea and British Hong Kong, and who are in favour of serfdom in Tibet, usually also generally just support colonialism elsewhere as well. Not that being in favour of colonial governments in Korea and elsewhere is in any way good.

One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don’t want that on my feed.

One of your lines in the sand is when people are against colonialism and in favour of anti-colonial liberation, then. No doubt because you uncritically believe the same people who said ‘but Iraq has WMDs!’ and have lied about and demonised their other enemies.

I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine

Then you want Ukraine to be free from NATO, as opposed to being its yet another glorified military base meant to threaten the colonial hegemon’s enemies, to invade them, and to carry out terror attacks on NATO’s behalf.

Tebet

Tibet is not under serfdom. It was freed decades ago.

Hong kong

Good news. The colonial overlords in NATO have handed Hong Kong over a couple of decades ago.

just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn’t mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.

Considering that it’s ‘authoritarians’ who have contributed the most to anti-colonial liberation, this is a a massive self-report.

NATO does not forcefully enter any country

NATO has invaded, among other countries, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Palestine, Vietnam, Korea.

countries have to apply to become a member

Ah, you meant ‘nobody is forced to join NATO’, as opposed to it actually forcefully entering countries the way it did with the ones that I mentioned (among others)? Do you think that voluntarily joining the world’s most prolific aggressor that is, among other things, conducting at least one obvious genocide is somehow good? Not sure how that is relevant otherwise.

There were already many weapons on several of Russia’s borders before NATO was there.

Are you talking about the borders with the Baltic states and Norway, which are in a considerably different place than the border with Ukraine?
Do note that Ukraine has a large border close to Russia’s most populated areas.

NATO has only reinforced this (as part of the agreement signed with the country in question).

Which doesn’t make any of this better.

Economic warfare" (aka. economic sanctions) NATO has nothing to do with

NATO - i.e. the US and its subordinate states in Europe and elsewhere - is quite literally the initiator of the blockade against Russia (and other states/countries).

Terror attacks on civilian targets? Please provide sources.

Some of the recent ones include the dropping of bridges onto civilian trains and drone striking civilians. Also, not directly related, but I’m going to remind you of the fact that NATO has also been committing war crimes like perfidiously using civilians to conduct military activities like with the ‘Spider’s web’.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/02/ukraine-war-briefing-ukraine-launches-one-of-its-deepest-drone-strikes-into-russia-killing-three

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/01/deaths-as-russian-train-hits-collapsed-bridge-after-interference

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-blames-us-ukrainian-strikes-crimea-rcna158471

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/03/world/europe/russia-ukraine-crimea-bridge.html

The most prolific invader in the world - NATO - putting weapons on the border with Russia, conducting economic warfare against Russia, and conducting terror attacks on Russian civilians is, in fact, aggressive.

EDIT: Also, the assumption that Putin wants to recreate the USSR is silly, as is the assumption that that would be a bad thing if it was true.

I’m asking for reasons as to why to critically support Russia as opposed to Ukraine

One is allied with the world’s colonial hegemon that has been committing genocides and invasions everywhere, is openly run by nazis, has been involved in helping NATO conquer at least Syria and Iraq, and has been carrying out terror attacks on behalf of the genocidal empire of NATO.

Where the aggressor is still less moral due to being the invader.

Attempting to join NATO, threatening to bring NATO’s weapons and troops to the borders of is targets, and threatening to engage in terror attacks is an act of aggression. Furthermore, Ukraine has also invaded at least Syria and Iraq.

Also, seriously, what’s with the ‘full-scale invasion’?

Isn’t it funny how people like you - for whom the English language is supposedly their first one - can’t read even singular sentences?

I can tell you that that comment does not say that this law makes it explicitly illegal to do that. Not that it would have mattered, as people are being arrested for opposition to the genocide in question - including when they are just protesting the way you claim to be perfectly fine and legal, - i.e. even the central point that you tried to make is wrong.

On the contrary. A post with (currently) 45 upvotes states exactly “Thinking of putting up Palestine stuff in my windows just to dare them to come get me.”

Notably, it doesn’t say what you claim it says. You need to learn to read English.

This is exactly what I mean. Putting up Palestine stuff is just fine, perfectly legal, and you cannot be arrested for it.

You can. People have already been arrested for protesting against the genocide. With this law being the justification.

PA probably aren’t terrorists, just protesters who took it a bit too far

They didn’t take it too far. If you think that opposing a genocide is ‘taking it too far’, then you have no basis for objecting to being called a nazi.

but the facts are: they broke into an airbase and damaged RAF jets by pouring paint into their engines.

Yeah, and? If you think that sabotaging a nazi state’s warplanes is bad, then it’s pretty obvious where you stand.

This will take those jets out of commission until the damage has been assessed

Good.
You are yet to bring up any reason to believe that PA did something bad.

which is a cost that could run into millions because jet engines aren’t exactly cheap

Good. The more the nazi states are hindered, the better.

So a case could be made that they are also terrorists, but it’s a bit of a stretch.

In that case, every non-official group that opposed such things as the Holocaust and the Lebensraum, Manifest Destiny, NATO’s invasions of Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, etc., the European colonial rule over most of the world, and the like are all ‘terrorists’. The only people who aren’t are members of official militaries and the people who support those things, it seems.

“rooting out opposition to the genocide” No, we’re not doing that.

That is exactly what you have been doing.

There’s plenty of opposition and it’s fine

Let me guess, all of this opposition that you think is ‘fine’ is of the completely ignorable sort?

we live in a democracy

Says the person who lives under a literal monarchy with plenty of hereditary ruling positions, and where the vast majority of people have no say in what the state does.
Also, if you think that you live in a democracy, that means that you should bear responsibility for what your state does, as that would mean that you have a say in what your state does. That indicates that your state perpetrating a high-profile genocide is approved by you.

and people are free to support whoever they want to support (in this case: as long as it’s the Palestinians in general, not Hamas).

Ah yes, as long as they don’t support any resistance to the genocide.
Also, people like you who can’t even form a coherent thought for why supporting Hamas (and other groups that are resisting the genocide) is supposed to be bad, but want to keep repeating that cliche are quite silly.

Because they broke into an airbase and damaged some RAF planes.

I.e. they opposed the genocide. That is a good thing.

That was the problem, not protesting about the war in Gaza, which is still legal.

‘Protesting’ doesn’t do anything (not on its own, at least). It is completely ignorable if the actually relevant actions that protesting might gather support for are illegal.

Going to note again that you are a nazi bootlicker.

As a native English speaker who knows to varying degrees a few other languages I know it’s a tricky language so I wanted to clarify the distinction between “Palestine Action” and “Palestine action”

Notably, nobody is confused about the difference. You, however, seem to have a hard time understanding that, and you also seem to be confused about how branding PA as terrorists and rooting out opposition to the genocide are related.

You were explained to that you are being called a ‘nazi’ because you are a genocide supporter. It seems that you have a hard time understanding written English speech.

For those for whom English is not their first language, this means the group named “Palestine Action”. It does NOT mean “action and other stuff in favour of Palestine”.

You seem to be hard of thinking. Why do you think PA is being branded as terrorists if not to stifle opposition to the genocide?

Imagine equating a state and related movements that massively improved working-class people’s lives, including in terms of life expectancy, literacy rates, including by providing guaranteed housing, universal healthcare, fundamental women’s rights that are taken for granted today, and which not only fought off settler-colonialism in the form of the Lebensraum and the Holocaust, but also helped many other countries liberate themselves from European powers, with things like Germany under NSDAP, the US, Pissrael, and NATO in general.

They didn’t need to do that.

If the PRC didn’t do anything, then the PRC stood by.

In case you didn’t realize it, China is a country of 1.4 billion people, and there are plenty of companies available that can trade with Russia at any given time

Okay, so the PRC did not undertake any initiatives, and it was just trade as usual, it seems.

The video I linked, which you didn’t have time to finish, gives concrete examples of that

Can you provide at least one timestamp? I am busy, tired, and probably sick these days, and I don’t want to dedicate too much time that I could spend on my studies on a capitalist talking about how great private companies are at innovation for what, 40+ minutes?

He explains how China is intentionally turning a blind eye to military exports to Russia which they’re officially not doing. It’s incredible to me that people can be so naive to think that everything Russia and China are doing is done publicly

If the PRC actually supplied Russia with weapons, sure (even though that’s a very different thing from what you initially pointed to). What are those weapons, and why haven’t I heard about them? Or are we talking specifically about components and resources that are used in manufacturing weapons in Russia, in which case the PRC also supplies NATO with those.

https://kyivindependent.com/china-suts-drone-sales-to-ukraine-west-but-continues-supplying-russia-bloomberg-reports/

Yeah, this counts, but this does come very late into the war, and is very different from what you pointed to previously.

https://energynews.oedigital.com/mining/2025/03/20/china-export-controls-have-frozen-antimony-shipments-into-the-eu-since-october

My bad. I must have mixed up the PRC going back on its other restrictions during the recent deal with the genocidal hegemon.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions

The PRC has made an agreement with NATO to go back on restrictions on rare earths exports.

China cut off drone sales, critical supplies of explosives, and rare earth minerals that make it effectively impossible for NATO to produce modern weapons.

I’ll believe it when I see NATO stop being able to produce modern weapons instead of using them to enact genocides and colonial reconquest.

An interesting way to say massively increasing trade with Russia, while cutting the west off critical things they need to produce drones and artillery shells.

Given that the former comes naturally from Russia having to find another export destination while being in a weaker position to negotiate, and the PRC has already gone back on some of the latter, that’s not a way to say that, interesting or not.

Well I just did that above where I gave you links to the restrictions PRC putting on NATO that are directly impacting NATO military production.

And forgot the recent agreements to go back on some of that. And also only provided those links or pointed to those things after escalating for no good reason.

I’ve given you plenty of examples

Not until your latest comment. Up until then it was ‘the PRC has been doing business as usual with Russia, at a much lower volume than it has been doing with NATO, so it clearly took an action to support Russia’

Nobody suggested it was a charity, and it’s laughable to claim that it should be

I guess it is laughable that there should be cooperation between states outside the imperial core that would involve long-term solutions and be in any way comparable to what the USSR has done.

I love how you’re just making things up at this point

I love it how you can look at things like inflation (even just general, and not inflation of primary-needs goods) and think that it’s all made up. I would have loved to live in your fantasy world.
I also love how you seriously cited the ‘high-income country’ thing earlier. That was hilarious.

For starters, Russia never asked China to join the war or restart relevant industries

For starters, what the compradors in Russia asked or didn’t ask the PRC to do in this regard is irrelevant, as the PRC is in a position to coerce them.

Not clear what these are given that Russia is currently outproducing NATO by a large margin

So, you look at a semi-peripheral state the industries of which were destroyed in the 90s and which has been reliant on selling cheap resources and labour (while, admittedly, still having a periphery of its own and still having favourable unequal exchange with some of the countries outside of the imperial core, so Russia isn’t in the worst position out there) and on importing expensive finished goods, and can’t see a problem? Really?
But also, I would prefer to live in the fantasy world where Russia outproduces the entirety of NATO by a large margin in areas like electronics and industrial equipment.

Meanwhile, there are plenty of clear examples of China restricting trade with NATO

Which you only managed to point to after flipping out for no good reason and insisting that the PRC trading with Russia means that the PRC actively supports Russia in the war (even though there has been apparently neither a policy change nor any sort of action taken by the PRC in this regard), while the PRC trading with NATO is magically not counted as support for NATO. And forgot about the PRC also going back on some of those restrictions, and about some of those restrictions being very recent.
But sure, I do admit that I made a mistake with antimony. Let’s hope that restriction stays in place.

Sounds to me like you’re just upset that China didn’t start WW3, because taking the actions you suggest would certainly be a good way to go about doing it.

I can just as well accuse you of trying to invent a fantasy where your preconceived conclusions hold true, such as in the cases of the sanctions magically not hurting Russia and the PRC never being in the wrong (hopefully, you are still not creative enough to come up with claims like ‘the PRC siding with NATO against the USSR and helping plunge the world into the neo-colonial hell that we are witnessing today was good and awesome’), and that you want for nothing to be done about NATO’s colonialism.

There is absolutely no rational reason for PRC to enter the war directly

Except for ending the conflict more quickly and with lower cost in lives.

or to start provoking NATO further

NATO doesn’t exactly need a provocation to do things. It will come and destroy more of the world while the PRC stands by.

Who is everybody exactly? Do you even know anybody living in Russia?

Ой, прошу прощения, вы правы. Никого не знаю, никого на улицах и на работе не встречаю, никого со школ и с университетов - включая учителей - не знаю, живу в городе-призраке с нулевым населением. Даже меня там нет.

I followed the forum, do point out where they say recession is happening

The minister of economic development says that at around the 25:30 mark
https://youtu.be/Qtt9RFshDNc?t=1521

I’ve heard these predictions non stop for the past three years, and it’s incredible that people still keep regurgitating this nonsense

Are you saying that Reshetnikov or other people responsible for the Russian economy have been making these predictions for the past three years?

Here’s what things are looking like in the real world https://archive.ph/I8wrK

Oh, look. Russian compradors continuing to sell off cheap resources instead of finished goods.

LMFAO they are not talking about going to a recession

Well, you need to do something about your auditory comprehension now that you have been pointed to the minister of economic development talking about a recession.

That’s literally the argument you keep trying to make here

You also need to do something about your reading comprehension. I have already said that the actions of the PRC are not ‘dumb’. They are, however, neither altruistic, nor (in the case of the things that you were pointing out previously - I do admit a mistake regarding antimony, and the recent restriction on selling drones does count, even though it came very late) indicative of the PRC actively supporting Russia in the war.

because they would have to be complete imbeciles to allow Russia to fail against the west. Anybody with even a minimally functioning brain can understand that it would be a disaster for China

Well, one could have argued the same in the case of the PRC and the USSR, and yet, here we are.
But also, the PRC can afford Russia to go into crises that would weaken it and make trade with Russia even more advantageous to the PRC just fine, so long as it does not get couped by NATO.

If you understand that PRC is taking actions that are beneficial to them then you should also recognize that ensuring Russia is politically and economically stable is at the top of the list for PRC

Ensuring Russia’s economic stability is likely not something that the PRC is concerned about, as that could mean an even better, even more dependent source of cheap resources.
Ensuring long-term economic stability in Russia would mean stuff like restarting Russia’s industries and getting rid of the economic inequality (which can only be done temporarily under capitalism), which the PRC doesn’t really care about, either.

Keeping Russia politically stable? Sure.

Yeah that’s just not as exciting as you seem to think it is. Some companies in China do trade with the west and don’t want to lose that

So, did the PRC take any action to prevent companies from refusing to trade with Russia because of the sanctions? Or were there no such initiatives and it was all left to the companies to make the decisions based on the profit motive?

That doesn’t change the fact that China actively supported Russian war effort

How did the PRC actively support the Russian war effort? There don’t seem to have been any initiatives by the PRC to support Russia in the war, only the trade that would have been happening either way (with Russia being forced to find more export deals while being in a weaker position to negotiate in the case of how things have turned out).

Here’s an interview with a Russian drone developer who says that China has been quietly allowing mass shipments of drones and supporting tech into Russia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfNUM2CbbM

I haven’t had the time to finish the video, but if we believe the word of this capitalist, then we must also arrive to conclusions like:

• The PRC also supplies the Ukrainian military with drones (mentioned when the interviewee talks about an exploded Ukrainian drone between 9:00 and 10:00, and then mentioned again between 11:00 and 12:00)
• Private companies are better at innovation than state organisations
• Russian soldiers have never heard about UAVs and drones until 2022
• The PRC does not understand what makes a weapon good and make ‘toy-like’ weapons
• The PRC blocks export of some relevant things into Russia, including engines for drones

It does seem believable that the PRC doesn’t restrict trade relevant to the Russian weapon supply much, but the PRC also doesn’t seem to do much in terms of these restrictions against NATO, so Russia is not favoured here, and, again, not seeing any war-related initiatives.

I’m not sure what you want me to substantiate here

That the PRC has taken an action to support Russia in this war. Continuing ‘business as usual’ is not something that I would associate with taking an active part to support Russia.

the numbers speak for themselves https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/01/13/china-russia-trade-hit-record-high-in-2024-a87590

Cool. Now, compare those with PRC-NATO trade numbers and explain what initiatives the PRC took to support Russia.

You can bite back, but you can’t seem to produce a coherent argument.

Oh, we are escalating. Cool.

Well, firstly, I wasn’t making an argument - not initially, at least, - I was asking a question about what you meant (because what you said seemed - and still does seem - to be just copium), so you need to do something about your reading comprehension and being offended over your inability to explain what you mean and back your claims.
Secondly, you are yet to point to any initiatives that the PRC took to support Russia in this war.

In other words, China is filling the gaps left by the west and ensuring that Russian economy keeps functioning without taking any major hit as a result of sanctions

This is laughable. The PRC gets to receive cheap resources from Russia, with Russia being more disadvantaged now, and the Russian economy still takes significant hits from the sanctions.
This isn’t a charity - the PRC benefits from Russia’s weaker trading position.

Again, not sure why you think this is some sort of a gotcha.

So, the PRC trading with Russia is magically the PRC actively supporting Russia in the war, but the PRC also trading with NATO in much higher volumes is not the PRC actively supporting NATO?

And I’ve provided concrete examples of that happening

‘Business as usual’ is not a ‘concrete example’ of actively supporting Russia in the war. Hell, the PRC is taking action to keep trading with NATO.

which resulted in trade jumping astronomically between Russia and China throughout the course of the war

‘Astronomically’ is an obvious overstatement, and this rise is already seemingly dead. This rise in trade has also been just a simple rerouting of resource extraction, Russia becoming even weaker economically than prior to the sanctions, and with the PRC not taking action (that I’m aware of) to help Russia long-term.

I’m honestly not sure what you’d be expecting China to do that would qualify as not standing by in your mind.

For example, providing Russia with personnel and materiel, or joining the war officially, or taking action to restart relevant industries in Russia (which, again, I have mentioned, and I have mentioned that the PRC would never do this while having an economy that features the profit motive), or sanctioning NATO, or just restricting its own trade with NATO (especially when it comes to antimony and rare earths).

That very obviously did not happen

‘Oh silly you and everybody else who complains about things like inflation, including inflation of primary-needs goods that came with the sanctions and has been high ever since, none of that happened and it’s just a mass hallucination, even when the (lower estimate) stats are easily available online’.

Ah yes, just look at all the suffering from high inflation. The World Bank just reclassified Russia as a high income country

This is extremely silly. You probably also believe that $2 extreme poverty thing. All that the World Bank says there is just that Russia has a high GNI by their estimates, and an apparent major contributor to Russia’s rise in that regard is ‘military related activity’, which doesn’t (directly) help reproduce labour and expand an economy.
I suppose, not even that is going to last for long, considering that the government has been speaking about ‘cooling down’ the economy, with the minister of economic development speaking about a coming recession during the latest St. Petersburg International Economic Forum session.

Meanwhile, the IMF forecasts that Russian economy is set to grow faster than all the western economies

It predicted that for 2024. It is 2025 now.
Additionally, the inflation has not disappeared, the government is speaking about the slowing down of the economy, and we are probably going into a recession soon.

Despite what you might think, Chinese are not imbeciles

I don’t. I never claimed that the actions of the PRC were dumb or anything like that. I even explained why I don’t expect them to take some of the actions that I mentioned.
The PRC, however, has been taking actions that are beneficial to the PRC first and foremost. The government of the PRC doesn’t show any interest in upsetting the status quo of NATO’s colonial exploitation of the rest of the world, and the actions that it has been taking have been apparently aimed at keeping the PRC a beneficiary of that.

It’s the soviet onion.

Give substantial examples of how China followed western sanctions

Didn’t expect to engage in an argument on this matter, so I will need some time to dig up something more serious than stuff like this:

https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2023/05/how-sanctions-have-changed-the-face-of-chinese-companies-in-russia?lang=en

https://www.rbc.ru/business/17/04/2024/661f4a3c9a7947ce48d663ca

This does seem to have been going since at least 2014, as well:

https://tass.com/economy/751008

The fact that you just keep doubling down on this is frankly incredible

Notably, I didn’t say anything like this about your inability to substantiate your blindly optimistic claims, but if you want to escalate, sure, I can bite back. Are you sure you want to keep escalating?

Talk to anybody in Russia and you’ll see whether they think China helped or not

Well, I would have said that I’m in luck due to where I live, but out of the people in my social vicinity, I’m overwhelmingly likely the most informed one by far (and likely the only socialist). Notably, I first heard about PRC’s companies refusing to work with Russia because of sanctions from Russian communists.

Why do you think this might be happening?

The answer(s) to that seem to include things like the following: Russia’s bid to join NATO has failed, NATO’s attempts at cutting Russia off have been more successful domestically and less successful in the PRC which - due to having nukes and an economy which NATO depends on - is a lot harder for NATO to threaten, Russia has no serious consumer electronics and other relevant industries to speak of (and has no way of developing them without either losing access to relevant goods from the PRC that will be of higher quality, or having to compete with those higher-quality goods from the PRC while at a massive disadvantage) which means that it is highly dependent on the PRC, and so on, and so forth.

Notably, though, the PRC has been trading more with NATO than with Russia, NATO (including Ukraine, to my knowledge) has also not abandoned trade with Russia completely, and the PRC has not ignored the sanctions.

I’ve explained to you precisely what I meant already multiple times

If it’s just trade, then you have to contend with the fact that it was happening either way, and the PRC both trades with NATO much more than with Russia and also refuses to rid NATO of access to important resources. This is rather clearly a case of the PRC standing by.

It’s not, and Russia never asked PRC to do this. I’m not sure why you’d even suggest that they should be taking an active part in this war.

You did say that you are confident that the PRC did not just ‘stand by’ during this war, but aided Russia:

China wasn’t engaged in Ukraine directly either, but certainly wouldn’t say they just stood by this whole time either

Either the PRC did take Russia’s side and took action to aid Russia against NATO, or the PRC did not take any relevant action. If the ‘action’ in question is just trading, then you have to contend with the fact that the PRC trades more with NATO and refuses to remove NATO’s access to relevant resources.

I’ve already addressed this earlier. PRC provides Russia with technology that it would not be accessible to Russia otherwise. For example, practically all cars are imported from China at this point, and that’s just one example

Notably, the PRC also provides NATO with resources and technologies, and relevant trade happens in greater volume there.

Also, Russia being forced to import things because it has no relevant industries to speak of has been the reality for decades now. An actually helpful move would be assisting Russia in developing those industries (which won’t happen because that would hurt the PRC’s ability to export things).

The whole point of NATO sanctions was to cut Russia off from tech it needs.

The whole point was to hurt Russia’s economy. A complete cutting off from relevant technologies wouldn’t have ever happened.
In terms of hurting Russia’s economy, the sanctions seem to have been (at least partially) successful, as Russia has been suffering from high inflation.

Guaranteed housing has not been a thing since 1998. The end of an era.

On that note, despite all my knowledge saying that planned economies are interested in implementing guaranteed housing, and despite that conclusion/conjecture being supported by every case that I have encountered information on so far, I would like to ask for sources with confirmation of this fact, including ones in Putonghua. Can you point to any such sources.

The hukou system means many are effectively guaranteed housing

Is everybody (barring some individual cases of people falling through the cracks) guaranteed to be provided housing? If not, then that’s not it. If yes, then why do there seem to be quite a lot of homeless people, and why is the price of housing a concern at all?

Yeah they very much ignored the sanctions

They didn’t, and I’m not sure why you keep claiming this. In particular, PRC’s banks are often mentioned as refusing to work with Russia because of the sanctions.

If you genuinely can’t see the difference between NATO trade with Russia and China there’s really no point continuing this discussion

What I am trying to understand is what you meant when you said that the PRC didn’t just sit this one out. So far, you have only mentioned trade that was already happening instead of being some sort of special measure done to support Russia in the war, and which the PRC has also been conducting with NATO (and the PRC seems to have mostly been trading with NATO). This trade also most likely benefits the PRC much more, as Russia is a semi-peripheral state that relies on exporting natural resources (rather than manufacturing and using or exporting finished goods).
If your claim to the PRC supposedly taking an active part in this war was by doing what it was already doing (trading with Russia on better terms than NATO’s), then it’s fair to conclude that the PRC opted to stand by and let things happen (especially considering that it did let its companies refuse to deal with Russia on the basis of the sanctions). Considering that the PRC trades more with NATO than with Russia, by your logic we could conclude that the PRC has been helping NATO this whole time - including in the context of this war.

The PRC did not ignore the sanctions. Some of the trade did get shut down because of the sanctions.
On the other hand, NATO didn’t completely stop trading with Russia. Does that mean that NATO also contributed to the war effort against itself and should be thanked for that?