Yes, I’ll just trust the AI to help me fuck around with grid voltage levels.
With google search results becoming so poor, I guess I need to look into kagi or duck-duck. Pain in my dick, motherless goatfucking, horsehit-happy asshole, corporate varmints gotta fuck it all up for more profit. I’m tired, yo.
You must log in or register to comment.
Related: https://llmdeathcount.com/
Sad to say, but this is a lot lower than I expected? Although I’m sure a vast majority of cases will never make it here.
I’m sure it’s pretty hard to confirm. Especially for indirect causation or partial contributing factors.
I prefer to have the AI overviews and such off with uBlock. AI should be separate from search engines, and should also be regulated.
Recommendation - if you are using AI for search, avoid whatever Google is using for “Google” search. It is a highly efficient, fast model that is often far from accurate and easily confused - not to mention its context window is extremely limited.
In fairness to AI, I personally wouldn’t trust forum posts on this subject matter either, only written documentation or a professional.
Only trust the data sheet from the manufacturer. Only if listed in compliance with your use case. Trust nothing else. All other options will kill you
I don’t use Google and I agree with the energy. But every electrical product I’ve ever purchased has come with a manual, which gives all of the safety information.
So I guess read your manuals and don’t go rage searching on Google
Until you lose your manual and need to look up the information online, hoping to find the manual or relevant info you are first presented with this.
lots of people wont search any further than the AI summary.
I’d hope if you’re in a job where you regularly poke around line voltage and higher, you’d be smarter than to think your little meter can handle transmission voltage.
I’m more concerned about people who don’t do that regularly and think ‘don’t worry; I’ll ask Google’
I hate AI too, but reading and parsing manuals is one of the few things it’s actually good at. The linked sources are right there if OP wants to confirm
It’s not so great when the only available digital manual is a jpg scan from a printed version. There’s also no way to tell what other sources an LLM is using when it generates its summary, and when you’re dealing with things that are important to get right, like voltage, you have to just read the manual/specifications.
deleted by creator
Pain in my dick, motherless goatfucking, horsehit-happy asshole, corporate varmints
Off topic, but that’s a nice spattering of invective you got there, OP. Well done. I genuinely appreciate a well-crafted compound insult.
The AI CEOs should be forced to follow some dangerous procedure exactly as explained by their shit planet-killing product live for all to see. If they’re confident this is the future, they should set the example.
I would rather have them held accountable in the same way that any news outlet or publisher would be held accountable for publishing false information that could have deadly consequences.
It’s only a matter of time before a fifth-grader follows some inane advice because it was the first result from Google and is irreversibly maimed because of it.
Where are all the Helen Lovejoy types when we can actually use them?
It’s only a matter of time before a fifth-grader follows some inane advice because it was the first result from Google and is irreversibly maimed because of it.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/us/openai-chatgpt-suicide-lawsuit-invs-vis
I think we’re already there in many aspects
My father just ruined some PCB while soldering because Gemini told him what to do.
I’m sure there’s many more cases that are worse and we simply do not know about.
The days when YouTube had actual people in their cluttered garages, basements, and driveways showing you how to fix shit was good. Between the algorithm fucking it over and AI giving wrong info, we’re likely going to win some Darwin awards en masse, around the house.
I’ve tried it. It’s good for plucking out game solutions (low risk), and finding the right forum for That Linux Workaround. Or just parroting Wiki.
Catch it in a wrong answer and it will answer just as confidently, agreeing that it was wrong. And yet.
And we’re destroying homes and the life equity of working class for this.
I think the “Darwin awards” are part of the plan to be honest. These guys in the TESCREAL crowd are pretty much exo-facist malthusians that think the rest of us are expendable.
A Modest Proposal. The Theil credo.
To be fair YouTube was full of bullshit DIY videos too. You used to be able to see which ones got lots of downvotes for being bad…but nah, let’s not show that to people anymore
Sensitive Sally’s didn’t like being downvoted. So the losers at Cherry Ave changed the whole site to not trigger mentally ill people.
A species-level Darwin award is the solution to the Fermi Paradox.
Yep, we’re our own great filter.
There are still good YT channels. Learn Linux TV is excellent, as is Sabine Hossenfelder, Anton Petrov, Techmoan, and Louis Rossmann.
Yes, but they’re harder to find organically, since the search function seems to be set up to barf out the top 10 most trafficked. For example, I’ve trained my algorithm to never give me 731 Woodworking (looks like a QVC ad, every time, no woodworking), but if I search for new woodworking, that’s what I get, a long list of mostly 731 woodworking.
And, for whatever reason, people love watching re-rolled clips (the poster didn’t create) of whatever with someone making expressions and reacting to it. Worst content ever, and yet.
i recently found ecosia having better results than duckduckgo, give it a try. qwant also seemed ok but they geoblock me so i need a vpn to search there…
for keyword searching obscure stuff etools tend to work well for me but they have some weird system where you gotta refresh a couple of times to have results actually load properly
when will they be held liable for this shit?
That’s the neat thing: never, because they explicitly tell you that big babble machines make mistakes and you’re responsible for any actions you take on that.
forget about just being outright wrong all the fucking time, you can ask this piece of shit a very simple yes/no question and it will change its answer constantly when you do so much as refresh the page. its actually baffling to me. duckduckgo has search ai, and somehow theirs works fine enough %90 of the time and won’t change its answer with each page refresh. DDG is doing search ai better than Google, the third biggest company in the world who may as well own the internet, AND YOU CAN JUST TURN THE DDG AI OFF. Big tech are so embarrassingly incompetent.
Just switch your search engine already.
time and won’t change its answer with each page refresh.
Maybe it just recalls the answer for at least a few hours?
Seems like a good way to improve precision without improving accuracy.
It’s very common to cache results for LLM because it saves a ton on computation costs.
I can vouch for Kagi, although I wouldn’t say their AI is that much better. But if you find like 5 other friends the family plan is worth it.
How does kagi define “family”? Like netflix?
afaik its just a group discount plan
I ask because having an inclusive definition of “family” being whittled down eventually to a single IP address is a pretty common trope of enshittification…
Anyway, itś $20/month, so if I had some nerd friends, I’d consider it.
I think one beer every two weeks at the pub would cover their contribution.
Having a VPN for the initial purchase will yield you even less. Not sure about which country had it the cheapest, but IIRC the lowest was like 12€.
Duckduck with ai turned off is pretty decent.
IronFox has a DuckDuckGo (No AI) mode.
noai.duck.com You can use it in any browser
Duckduck go is just an external marketing venture for bing.
Just remove the ai element with ublock origin filters on whatever search engine your used to.
If you care about privacy spin up a searxng which grabs results from all configurable search engine without accepting bribes for special tracker acces.
This will still waste all the energy. Just use the noai version
Add &udm=14 for a google search and it doesn’t
Local searchxng doesn’t have ai features to need any noai. It still the superior choice.
Though you could argue that cause searchxng queries multiple search engines at once this is a bigger energy costs then just the one. But you could configure it to only search by you deemed ethical engines.
Duck duck go just isn’t a choice, you and others can still choose it but i have yet to find even a single benefit to it. The privacy is fake and the results are meh.
(Remember when “no one wants to use bing” was a meme?)
Yes, I’ll just trust the AI to help me fuck around with grid voltage levels.
I mean, if you do… you kinda deserve what comes to you.
No, no you don’t.
This assumes people know how AI works, and that’s not common knowledge.
Dude, like a handful of people have any idea how it works, it was completely a black box until recently when they started deciphering how it “thinks” before outputting in any given language. And before anyone argues, yes, researchers have actually started to assess how it processes stuff now, they’ve recorded the binary processing that wasn’t language based and upon suspecting they found the processing akin to what we’d call thinking for ai, they saved the streams, presented it to other ai in droves and asked them to interpret it independently of the other system that manufactured it, and indeed it matched up with the processing of requests, but was not in any human language, it’s indeed machine code, but not like Fortran or cobal or hexadecimal codes that we are used to dealing with, it has its own language. So no one has a library or Rosetta Stone yet to interpret this, and as of now you have to “trust” other AI to tell you what it means. Which obviously isn’t a good idea at all.
Edit: the paper since some of y’all don’t believe it, and frankly I don’t blame you. It’s new research. "Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?” https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119
not hexadecimal codes lol. you are clueless.
but also, the point was that for most even a general level of understanding is missing, making them easily think that it is the all knowing machine that cannot be wrong
I think you missed the key part of what the person you replied to said: common. It is not common knowledge. Yes some people who have done extensive research and spent hundreds of hours on this stuff might have a somewhat good understanding of how LLMs and GenAI work. Do you think just your average person using Google has any idea how it works? No, no they do not.
You have no idea what you’re talking about and you’d feel a lot better if you could just accept that. This story you are telling is absolutely nonsense fantasy, stitched together from a bunch of different actual things to create a narrative that tells a completely untrue and fantastical story
Why do you have the exact number of upvotes that the person you’re replying to has downvotes. Seems like an unlikely coincidence. Also weird how you don’t actually address anything in the comment. Almost like some bot brigade.
if someone tells you some computer data can’t be represented in hexadecimal codes, that’s a clear sign they don’t even know how computers work, let alone LLM. its also futile to compare the LLM internal representation of data to programming languages, its like comparing birdsong to building blueprints.
My comment was addressing frisbirds jackassery, not the op.
Hilarious conspiracy brained shit.
Wrong. Here’s one of the papers on the research. “Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?”
https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119
and a video on the paper
Your writing shows that you have no idea how to interpret this paper at all. You clearly have no historical concept of the development of machine learning, neural networks, and the fundamentals of the domain. You are trying to read a cutting edge paper that relies heavily on the reader having deep domain expertise. The video you linked is ALSO not for laypersons as it doesn’t actually explain the basics of the domain. You can’t just dive into the deep end of a pool without knowing how to swim and then tell everyone you were lost at sea.
This isn’t even what I meant by “how it works”. I mean that it’s basically a machine that outputs whatever next text that would be the most probabilistic given the previous text and input.
So the basics of how it works. Not exactly how it works.
Most people don’t know the basics of AI and how it works in that sense. They hear AI and think “I Robot” and think the computer is actually talking to them and giving them something that a “brain” has “reasoned” about, which is not the case.
You want to cite some sources because like a lot of things people say about AI this too sounds like bullshit?
no.
these things are sold to us as magical black boxes of universal knowledge. most people don’t know how they work.
blame the ai companies, not the people who fall prey to their lies. why does this have to be said. come on.
these things are sold to us as magical black boxes
Dawg EVERYTHING is sold to us that way… Well not everything, but you get it.
Learning to spot “marketing” BS is a survival skill at this point. People have to learn.
What I’m saying is, the way AI is done is immoral and wrong, but we need to be able to spot “immoral and wrong” from a very young age if we’re to make it to old age. AI is just one such instance that can get you messed up or even killed.
Learning to spot “marketing” BS is a survival skill at this point. People have to learn.
survival skills are inconvenient, like being responsible for your kids and your own choices, so you can forget the average person to bear that.
Can we stop treating people as mentally challenged toddlers? When AI started, I would have agreed with you about this. But if today you still use any AI and trust what it says, after all we have seen it does, it’s on you.
Am I saying that AI companies are not to blame? No. I think AI companies are to blame for the shitty product they are delivering. But let’s not take any personal responsibility of people. If you plug a fork in an outlet and shock yourself to death, there’s nobody to blame but yourself for being dumb. And this is the same.
This kind of attitude completely ignores the fact that there are vulnerable people who are very susceptible to the sycophantic nature of GenAI. There are multiple reported instances of people being convinced to kill themselves or others by GenAI. AI companies won’t do anything about this kind of thing unless they are forced to.
No. This is absolutely the wrong attitude. AI companies must be held accountable for all the horrible shit AI is doing.
I agree that we should hold people responsible, but I’d argue mentally challenged toddler is much much closer to the average human intelligence than you think. The average person is shockingly stupid.
If you plug a fork in an outlet and shock yourself to death, there’s nobody to blame but yourself for being dumb.
And yet, we still design outlets in ways that make that exact kind of thing as hard as possible. Because there will always be kids who have no idea what they’re doing. Because there will always be old people unfamiliar with the technology that “everyone” should know how to use by now. Because accidents happen.
Can we stop treating people as mentally challenged toddlers?
Yes, but let’s wait until the lead-poisoned generation have been cared for first. And also until those harmed by whatever the brainworm-in-chief FDA is up to have been cared for. After that, let’s expect everyone to be able to think things through.
- has already killed many
Yes, let me ask the computer voices about physical reality. Don’t use AI. If you’re going to anyway, leave it to the only domain it can interact with. It doesn’t know shit.
One might think the ‘sentient’ electricity could know something about electricity.
Thats like expecting humans to know how blood works
Thats like expecting humans to know how blood works
Ah, but I’ve mastered knowledge of the various humors!
Of course! Why not?! Just tell people information that could KILL THEM! I am sure that has not happened before… right guys? Right? RIGHT?! AI is out of control and needs to be regulated. How many people have destroyed their stuff or died trusting AI? G-D only knows… oh my.
No.
Stupid people do stupid shit.
Gemini doesn’t tell to to do this or that (“stick a fork in a socket and set what happens”). Your best friend tells you to jump off a bridge… Nope. AI is giving you the specs and things to consider. “If you jump off this particular bridge, then this will be the likely outcome”. That is factually correct!
If you don’t understand how to use AI as a probability indicator, that’s on you. Not everyone who jumps off of that bridge or sticks that fork in that socket will die, but the odds exceed 87% or whatever.
If you can’t use it for what it is, then don’t use it. When I worked as an hvac tech for Walmart, sometimes AI had bad information, but it was always 100% correct in flagging something that looked out of spec (“This is a potential problem”). It had far more eyes to look at everything (every store), than my 2 eyes had looking only at the store I was in.
AI will give you a whole 'nuther perspective than your own 2 eyes and biased brain. “Well I’ve never been injured doing xyx”. Yeah, OK. But “if you use a grinder without a face mask, and you injure your eyes, you won’t get your eyesight back”.
Take it for what it’s worth. AI can show you some serious blind spots in your logic by condensing thousands of research papers and web pages in milliseconds.
If you don’t want to use it, that’s on you. I really don’t care.
Gemini doesn’t tell to to do this or that
it reaffirms you to do very stupid things while masquerading as universal knowledge
If you can’t use it for what it is, then don’t use it.
This isn’t how AI is advertised, though. The majority of voices that people are hearing are just saying “AI can do anything” and not cautioning against trusting it. That’s not a matter of being stupid, it’s a matter of being lied to
Well. It’s still on you. I’ve busted Gemini for contradicting itself multiple, multiple times. “But you just said this…”
It is programmed to speak authoritatively. If you question it, it is programmed to go into customer service mode. That is no lie. There are certain prompts you can use to prevent it from hallucinating, conjecturing or assuming. You can actually ask Gemini (AI) how to turn that off.
I’ve had many discussions with AI about numerous topics. I consider it a valuable asset especially with regards to my “blindspots”. It is a tool. It has been proven to be superior at spotting cancer and other issues way before any human could/would.
It still amazes the crap out of me that dogs can be trained to smell out cancer or screw worms or whatever.
It’s wack, but Gemini can tell you what you’re looking at. I was looking at an obvious sagebush (texas) and Gemini told me. Nope that’s an oregano plant. Looked exactly identical. It described how the leaves weren’t a little bit fuzzy. It suggested i pinch/ twist and smell it. It was right, I was wrong.
You need to use it as a discrimination technique rather than the “be all end all”.
I took a picture of my cat and asked Gemini to describe it. It described the cat, it’s color, its head, direction, it’s eyes, its tail, the lighting, the porch, the grass, the bowls, the bald patch of grass, the colors, the shapes, the textures, the size, the geometry… in much more detail than I would’ve ever thought of describing it. If I were a detective, I would have AI point out every detail of a photo. I will bet you I’d miss noticing or describing at least a dozen details.
I, for one, don’t believe falling for false advertising is the customer’s fault.
It’s the company’s fault, and they should face consequences.
I wonder if you’ll continue to see it as a valuable tool when they jack the price up.
There was NO false advertising here.
Dude. I’m 64. I’m retired. I really don’t give a shit what you think. If I were in your shoes I’d get on top of AI before it gets on top of me.
Word to the wise.
if you dont fucking care then at least stop spreading fucking bullshit. you are no better than an AI, making the same mistakes, overconfident, but then blaming others for it.
I’ll probably have to kill myself when I reach retirement age, so good for you.
I’m not sure who it was that suggested that the “kids” that i train might be killed or injured by high voltage electricity.
Of the dozens of apprentices I’ve trained, l don’t know of one that has been injured in that way. I have been shocked, more than once in my 32 years in the field. We didn’t have AI.
Dude. If you don’t want to “trust” AI, then I’m totally chill with that. You do you.
I’ll do me.
My suggestion to you is: don’t use AI. It’s not for you!
