• DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t use Zoom, Teams, etc. But I’ve seen quite a few posts that suggest people hosting the meetings have to ask others to mute themselves or turn off their cameras. Do the people hosting meetings not have the ability to mute the people joining them? Sounds like a no brainer to have that feature.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      every single video conference application I’ve used has these features

      they are always self explanatory and easy to use too

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you want my opinion, be prepared to get criticized if whatever you presenting sucks ass. If you don’t want it, stop inviting me to meetings and send an email. It’s really not that hard.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yeah where I work some of the managers get really upset if you criticise them even if their ideas are stupid. If you go on Glassdoor look the company up everyone complains about it so it’s pretty bad.

      When they have these meetings to “discuss” an idea really what they want to do is just have an audience to announce it to. I always claim to be busy so I never attend these meetings anymore.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That was a great interview, now I think that I need to watch his movies I didn’t on the ground of not liking Ali G. Maybe even Ali G, too

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sacha Baron Cohen was before his time. I still don’t know how Da Ali G Show got made. His interview with Newt Gingrich was comedy gold.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It depends on what the meeting is. There are situations where you might not agree with decisions being made, but undermining your superior infront of business partners is not ok.

      Those are the kinds of problems you handle privately. Not in a meeting with other people from other companies.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yep and now you are committed to something you didn’t want to be committed to because you couldn’t say anything in the meeting.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You were probably already committed to it long before the meeting started.

          Time for objections and concerns have already passed

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You always talk before a meeting to decide what is going to be decided in the meeting.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That is assuming you have sane environment and processes, which is a bold assumption for a lot of people

              • lad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                43 minutes ago

                You seem to expect the person you talk to would listen, it’s not always the case, unfortunately

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        While I agree, I also think most such meetings can be held between those superiors just fine

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There might be questions asked. And then you need the appropriate head of department to answer it. That’s why they’re there while not being expected to say anything.

          I’ve had to implement systems I did not like. Systems I thought were inferior to other methods. But when the decision is made, it’s made. And when asked how we plan to implement it, I answer with the plan and the steps. I don’t undermine us by expressing disapproval in the formal meeting.

          It’s called professionalism.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    179
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t know how to not be this person.

    Everybody else is wrong. A meeting is for back and forth communication. If they didn’t want a meeting, they shouldn’t have scheduled a meeting. Just write a memo or something. Everybody has far too many meetings anyways, and you’re an asshole if you waste everybody’s time on extra meetings that aren’t even meetings.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah seriously, body communication is still communication, this host just doesn’t want negative feedback.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      20 hours ago

      100% agree with this.

      If you don’t want feedback, make your shit meeting an email. Otherwise it’s a self-aggrandizement ego soothing cheerleading session.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Had a manager once who told everyone to turn on their cams so he would “know that they were paying full attention.” Heaven forbid you treat your team like professionals instead of 3rd graders!

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Sounds like they don’t want this person in the conversation, if they don’t want to hear them, see them or know what they think.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yet, you are forced to work with these kind of people.

      Forced is a key word: we are cattle.

      I’d call the solution men going their own way, if the Incels didn’t do it first.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Sounds like this person just won the lottery. Apparently some people absolutely need to see the person that they are talking to, but I personally hate when my job has meetings and we have to have our cameras on. I don’t need to see you. Just say what needs said or show whatever on your screen and then let’s move on with the day.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It’s also such a neurotypical thing to (want to) force people to have the camera on.

      Some people work better without at times.

      Just let them work however they want and show trust, it might just benefit everyone. If I am not focused on showing an expectation of a facial expression I can focus on the topic.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I just let my two cats in the room sonce they can be relied upon to present their backside to the camera.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve taken to putting clear tape or a little vaseline on the lense.

      Everyone sees me, but the image is imperfect. I just say there’s something wrong with my camera.

      I’m slowly making it worse, so they get used to bad/no image.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Gonna get an email from IT saying they are sending you an external camera to use because the boss can’t peep at you.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Lol, there have to know there’s a problem, and I’m not telling them.

          IT isn’t that proactive - I would know, I’m part of it. We don’t have time for stuff people do report - we’re not going out looking for stuff.

          • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            And then they will request it back to inspect it. You really can’t win, best thing is to just do some wild makeup that is distracting. Maybe some black eyes and gashes. It’s none of their damn business what I do on my own time.

            • jack_of_sandwich
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              17 hours ago

              They ask to inspect it, take the tape off and give it to them. They hand it back, put the tape back on.

              Weird, it only happens on my computer…

              • rainwall@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Very light sandpaper, like 320. Just a couple of passes.

                It will make the glass grainy, and there is no real evidence you did anything.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 hours ago

    During our last meeting (where inexplicably 25 people where called to talk), my direct manager had to take a shit. He told my colleague who was sitting opposite of me to excuse him, should he be called while on the toilet (the order was random).

    Unsurprisingly, just as he had left, it was his turn. Despite being muted and had no video on, everyone heard me laugh because it was so loud my colleague’s mic picked it up.

  • some_guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The private slack channel I was in with others who had my role would always point out when I started looking angry and annoyed. Heh heh. I hated meetings at that company.