You must log in or register to comment.
Oi! You got a loicense fer that stepmum?
Given that everyone’s watching porn either on small sites flying under the UK radar or through a VPN/Tor now, what will this achieve exactly?
I do have a cause, though; it is obscenity. I’m for it. Thank you. Unfortunately, the civil liberties types who are fighting this issue have to fight it, owing to the nature of the laws, as a matter of freedom of speech and stifling of free expression and so on, but we know what’s really involved: dirty books are fun! That’s all there is to it. But you can’t get up in a court and say that, I suppose.
Tom Lehrer
“Playing GTA will make you kill hookers and steal cars! Just like watching porn will make you commit incest and pedophilia!”
I’ve never understood why this theme became so popular in porn. But also, it’s porn. If you’re watching it for the plot, you should probably be watching something else.
But obviously, this is more about banning something than actually an issue with the porn. Oiling up that slippery slope.
I think a lot of it is because it makes writing really easy. You don’t need to come up with a reason for these two people to be near each other in an intimate setting, which they can easily turn into something more sexual. Not many people are watching for the plot, so they just need a bare bones contrivance for it taking place.
You never quit beating your meat mid-fap because the plot was just so captivating?
There was one that really stuck with me. This poor homeowner needed a plumber but she had no cash. It was a harrowing story of love and loss, and the climax was stunning.
Did she end up getting her pipes cleaned?
Checked, cleaned, and re-caulked.
Hey, that lamp is really nice…where can I buy it?
I think because in order to product the kink you need to set a ground base for story. A lot of people just want some sort of story instead of just straight into it.
I think incest / 'stepcest' stuff is largely popular because:
- it can sprout innumerous plotlines, whereas most visual porn lacks story
- the “domestic” nature of it means they don’t have to shell out for multiple sets or fancy sets.
- The idea of other people breaking laws and putting themselves in danger seems to add to the dopamine hit of porn. Which is mabe why some people consume violent stuff.
In my op it’s popular with viewers largely because it is favoured by the studios.
I have to say though, from back in my porn watching days, i couldn’t stand the weird production quality in all the step-incest stuff. And the compulsion to pair up performers who have a big age gap, or to make performers look like teenagers, is disturbing. I doubt these things have changed.
It’s funny to imagine that the government might have a porn-Tsar who is just banning all the stuff they personally consider shite. Should have been me.
Porn-Tsar is my new favorite word.
A new role for Neil Parish I think
There’s sex with some level of plot, and there’s plot with some level of sex. It depends on which goal is greater for that movie or book. There is also a variety of degrees of porn plot, from bad to decent (with still the goal of being porn, but far more believable).
Are not-step-siblings still okay? Short of being admitted in the script, how does one know the relations? I guess the same validation as when the actress says she’s 18, right?
Families have inherent relationships built that can be nodded at without much conversation being necessary. Basically porn with plot without requiring as much plot.
There is a specific group that is in control of most of the porn websites. Lets just say they are super into it. For reasons.
because actual parental incest would fire up America’s family values.
Don’t look too closely at family trees in the Bible Belt.
I cannot answer this without sounding completely insane, even after the Epstein files people still won’t believe me. It’s the same as the Spiderman Elsa videos. They are experimenting on kids at specific stages of development. Parents just let them do it. Why?
Also, you should be watching something other than people being coerced into selling consent for the act or the viewing. It’s disgusting. You can have your nudes and tapes if people send them to you. That is not suitable entertainment for (de facto) all ages
Also I don’t support anything the UK government does, this ban won’t be effective, the prostitution industry has to be globally stamped out. Digital ID doesn’t solve anything it’s just building surveillance infrastructure they will use for more trafficking. The internet needs to become Chinese. Deny these basic facts if you wish, it only admits to not being serious about the issue.
Fuck these pieces of shit dude. Fucking stop with the protecting children talk. It’s all lies.
stop with the protecting children talk. It’s all lies.
Well in this case what’s the ulterior motive?
I do think children would be more protected if they could find a way to just ban porn from being viewed made or sold here, but the age-verification seems like enough in that regard (and the former idea is overreach, so ‘boo’, but would also help adults with porn problems).
There is no way the kids who grew up with technology in their lives from the start won’t find ways to work around it, especially when pitted against the people coming up with these legislations who struggle to understand the basics of technology.
Even if kids were to be completely banned from the internet and it somehow magically was enforceable, they’d just end up buying physical porn.
If they actually wanted improvement, they’d fund support for parents and the educational system so kids grow up in environments that teach them good values and feel safe in. But instead, we get this meaningless duct tape that’ll still probably cost a fortune for us, and will be unenforceable for anything but the biggest porn providers/distributors.
There is no way the kids who grew up with technology in their lives from the start won’t find ways to work around it
This is why i support the age verificsrion already in place, and perhaps a social media ban for kids - if we prevent them from seeing porn in the first place then they may not seek it out at all. Kids should at least be educated on how dangerous it is before they have a chance to stumble upon it.
So yes, they can locate it via VPNs and such, but that isn’t an argument against trying to prevent them from seeing the stuff in the first place.
Even if kids were to be completely banned from the internet and it somehow magically was enforceable, they’d just end up buying physical porn.
This doesn’t really line up with the experience of me or anyone my own age. Porn is popular because it’s on the screen and super easily accessible, like literally more easily accesible than food and water, lol.
But besides: physical porn is less harmful than internet porn.
- Are we talking playboy magazines? Static images > moving videos
- Or maybe porn videos? Well assuming such sales points even exist anymore, and aren’t enforcing age rules on the products sold, I still thinm they’ll end ul with stuff less violent or psychologically dangerous than they’d be seeing on the internet
- Alao, having to buy it from the get go makes it a much easier habit to manage. Rather than an addiction.
If they actually wanted improvement, they’d fund support for parents and the educational system so kids grow up in environments that teach them good values and feel safe in.
I do not feel good about getting the government to do nanny work for parents, as it has been disastrous so far. We should aim to get parents more time with their kids - e.g via a 4day work week - and we need to emohasis the importance of actually teaching your kids stuff rather than waiting for the government to do it.
I don’t follow your reasoning, you support the current laws enacted by the government in this area (age verification, proposing ban from social media) but you end your comment saying you disagree with the government nannying kids as they do a poor job of it. Those seem contradictory?
Also, you don’t need a VPN to get around the current set of age verification crap. All you need to do is to look at smaller providers, which the government ignored because it’s unfeasible to regulate them. Or providers from different countries who just straight up don’t care. It’s not even hard to find these, pretty much just page 2 of Google.
The point being, any of these laws are unenforceable in reality. Preventing access to porn is not feasible in today’s world. It was not feasible 30 years ago when the internet barely existed, except then yes it was magazines (and porn was still popular then because sex has always been popular in the history of humanity). In today’s world if it came down to it I imagine it’d be SD cards or usb sticks. You seem to imagine it like walking into a store, in reality it’d be the 1 kid who got his older brother to download him porn and then sells it in school to his classmates for a few quid.
These existed for pirated movies and games ages ago when access to them was harder. There is no need for this today because it’s easier to get it from the internet. If the government magically managed to change that (which is doubtful), these would just re-appear because there’d be money to make. Same story as drugs.
Regarding your last point, you phrased it like you were disagreeing with what I said, but basically just suggested the same but with concrete examples (re: better support for parents and the education system). I’m not sure what to make of that.
Burning books. Duh. Seriously. How are you so dense? It’s Farenheight 451 NOW.
Tbf i’d be riled up if i got home to find kier starmer tossing my excessive hentai collection onto the fire
Open Source. Encrypt everything. Crack your ME or PSP.
Idk what the ulterior motive is, but if your goal is to protect children this is like the third or fourth least damaging porn of all. Like ban all other fetishes first
That’s a good point. I personally think the racial fetishes are particularly harmful to how people perceive and treat one another.
I presume they’re going to do this again and again knocking off a new category each time, and if so, I’d rather they spare us the slow march by just banning it all at once.
Yes the boiling frog approach. Now basically going to do it one at a time so they don’t get too much pushback.
Governments can usually get away with whatever they wabt and the british government is the best example of this. I’d literally write a letter in and tell them they can get away with banning it all in one go if i thought they’d follow through on it.
But maybe there’s another reason they do it in little chunks; one distraction headline becomes about 14 distracrion headlines, so lavour gov is safe to have 14 seperste scandals over the course of the next year or so
In the UK? Home of the real-life incestuous monarchy? Is it unacceptable to pretend that non-blood relatives bang each other?
Next up is sexual relations with neighbours, then friends and finally sexual relations altogether.
Thank a god we have people looking out for us! /s
The only porn that will be allowed is between heterosexual married couples. And no peeking under the covers you perv! And don’t forget the weekly renewal of your porn license!
Won’t someone rid us of those pesky lemon-stealing whores?
Step-prime minister, what are you doing?
What are you doing, step-neighbor?
I was thinking the same thing. It’ll be back to neighbors and brother’s best friend.
We’ve got Therians and MOGgers to replace the steps.
Which is more believable anyway, so I’m not really sure why it changed.
Oi! You got a license for that step-sibling?
It’s in there somewhere, I was looking for it. Might need to check the other side.
Isn’t that all porn? 🤣
It turns out this isn’t a censorship ban or anything of the sort. The UK prime ministers are just tired of the unoriginality.
what happens if two bro’s swap semen and then their parents get married and they are step bro’s but they stop the fucking, is that ok?
and who will be watching all this porn to check?
