I remember my school cafeteria doing roughly this, entering a high number and then just heating orders up for a few seconds. Makes sense for them, but in a household, why…

I thought that was real, but will be eliminated?

Bis dieselben rechtlichen Theorien gegen Fediverse-Instanzen oder andere Websites, die du magst, verwendet werden, oder?

Ich vermisse phpBB- und ähnliche Foren und verstehe noch immer nicht, warum sich das Internet davon wegentwickelt hat. Wer hat je nach Empfehlungsalgorithmen gefragt?

Not necessarily, a legal definition of woman could include trans women too, the question is then how do you get recognized as such… fortunately I am not a politician and don’t have to have an opinion on everything…

I can kind of understand why places like women’s domestic violence shelters and women’s prisons need a legal definition of “woman” in order to define who is allowed in them (and have no opinion on what it should be). Places where there is actual physical or logistical infrastructure in place to make sure men don’t enter them…

But bathrooms? Someone wanting to commit sex crimes (or similar) against women in bathrooms is just going to walk into them and do exactly that, they aren’t going to change their legal gender just to do that because that doesn’t make it either easier or harder to physically get in there.

and also: data centers do not consume “as much water as possible”, they consume exactly as much as they need

ok, but this is still a weird concept that seems to stretch defamation law beyond what it’s intended for: A claims something negative (X) about B, B says “that is not true”, A then sues B because it’s a defamatory claim that A is lying about X? Do constellations like that happen a lot?

Some people might decide to take public transport instead of paying for car fuel if they feel a need to save money. With free public transport it is always clear what the cheaper option is.

Also public transport needs to be subsidized anyway, at some point you are actively wasting money by collecting fares if the staff and infrastructure for enforcing fares is more expensive than the income from fares.

Those exist in many places in the world. I have eaten vending machine pizza in Austria too.

In Wien haben wir ähnliche Probleme auch schon: https://wien.orf.at/stories/3364223/

I thought the goal was precisely not profit? 😂😂😂

But yes, this is exactly what I meant.

“Web” means HTTP and HTML.

I fail to understand the point of this.

If the goal is to be able to deliver documents without any JS, cookies, tracking, etc., then why not just deliver documents that way through the web? No one is forcing anyone to put those things on any website.

No, they are both not really suitable for that. But I don’t see where the link in the OP implies they plan to store binary image data in XML, they’re probably going to store that in a binary format and use XML to describe relationships and other metadata.

IMHO: XML is superior as a document storage format. JSON is superior as a data transfer format.

Yeah, they should (morally).

But countries have different constitutions that grant different rights, eg. in Australia there seems to be no constitutional right to freedom of speech or expression at all. So it is difficult to argue that there…

We can’t trust courts to get things like this right any more than we can trust legislatures.

forcing AI providers to watermark AI generated text would be quite effective

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_bit

This, and also you can do that with any LLM, not limited to Grok.

Windows goes to version 98! by now?