You must log in or register to comment.
What about the other 2%?
On one hand I support this to make porn more accessible to me. On the other hand it seems like a joke of a headline for the government to even care.
Cousin porn was always hotter anyways 🤷♂️
What about porn about running from home to your auntie’s house but they got a house rule, you gotta be naked the entire time. And well, you know you’re welcome to shower with your uncle and play with his dong when he’s working on the laptop on the couch. C’mon help yourself!
Alternative title: Step-government won’t stop railing its step-subjects until morale improves
Welcome to the People’s Republic of Britain
Unpopular opinion:
It’s porn, it’s escapist fantasy and like most porn, it touches on fringes. There is LOADS of popular porn out there that can only best be described as “rapey” and a lot of people (women included) are into it.
FFS, everyone and their mother knows incest is bad, we all know rape is bad and I honestly don’t believe that anyone would watch an incest video and suddenly think “well I have a son/daughter too!”
It’s a fantasy and with all fantasies, some like it, some don’t. As long as fantasies stay fantasies , can we please just let people be human beings? Can we please stop being the thought police?
The teacher and student? Very illegal in the real world, that’s why we have porn! The “I’m stuck under the bed!” porn is rape porn, hell, most porn can technically be explained as rape, and we all watch it.
The problem here is that anytime anyone speaks up, its immediately “oh so you like to rape your daughter!”. No I don’t, I just think that we should leave people be people and we should not censor all thoughts as certain people are trying to do here. I think people should be allowed to have sex fantasies in their heads about anyone, as long as those remain there.
Most people have no problem with this staying in their heads and I don’t think we should outlaw porn just because rape happens in the real world, when porn is not the cause.
Do not think for a second that it will stop with this, they’re just starting here because it’s an easy target. Soon it will be “oh so you’re one of those rapists that likes porn, huh?” and then all porn will be banned.
Is a teacher/student thing actually illegal if they’re out of high-school and are adults? Like sure it’ll get them fired, but illegal?
edit: And yes I am sure there are depictions of situations where it would be in porn, i was just curious if it was even an issue beyond that.
I am still 100% convinced this whole trend was a self sustaining accident/idiocy.
There was probably an actual organic desire for this kind of content so it was made. Ime most of the content doesn’t even try and make good on the title and it’s just regular ass porn, so it ends up getting traction, cus porn. This leads to content creators making more of it since for the most part all you have to do is have like 2-3 throw away lines in the scene and a risque title so it’s free to throw another genre label on there.
Now a feedback loop exists. More of the content is made because it gets bigger numbers so more content gets made.
All because it isn’t really mutually exclusive with any other genre, you can slap it into basically anything for free and attract a wider audience. I suspect the actual amount of people searching for specifically incest-y content is really low n
Why? It’s not incest. And it’s not real.
Wait. Step relatives sex is legal, but it’s depiction is not? What about step relatives relationships in non porn media? There was a very popular comedy years ago and this was one of the ongoing subplots.
Edit: it seems it might be illegal in the UK. Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
On the one hand, I’m really not a fan of the endless “step-*” porn. On the other, a law banning it is pretty heavy handed.
The one person watching it for the plot
Step sibling is gross. The step parent stuff is really really gross
It’s not real. They just put whatever title they think makes the best clickbait. Just like anything else.
So are beauty pagents and modern country music, doesn’t mean banning them is somehow not a massive waste of time, resources, and taxpayer money.
mushrooms are gross, I propose we make a law banning them
As a fellow mushroom unenjoyer, I concur!
Gross, yes, but not every gross thing is improved by having a law banning it’s depiction.
And school busses are more orange than yellow
Starmer’s fetish is apparently punching himself in the dick
Brits only enjoy real incest between royals
That’s the solution. Just call it nobility porn instead of step sister porn, oi.
This would actually be really funny. Make it historically accurate fiction.
Now this is the kind of revenge porn I can really get behind!
After-credits scene in 28 Years Later: the rage virus doesn’t really exist and the UK is just like that.
Those motherfuckers…
lol.
And yet the bible, a filthy book full of smut about nudist couples, prostitutes and much worse and more, is just allowed everywhere.
