• verdi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    48 minutes ago

    Now do Netflix, Prime, Paramount, HBO, Disney, Hulu and Apple and we’re golden.

    Would be a magical day the day copyright dies.

  • adO.Nis@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    Fuck… Now that RAM prices are skyrocketing, we gonna see hoarders buy hundreds of TB of storage, leading to price hikes

  • Alexhudosnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I know, I read about this news, but nowhere did I find this torrent file that they are talking about, do you know where they sent it to what site, and if this is just for the sake of information, do I condemn piracy?🧐

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How many full seeds are there? I mean how many could there be? Who has 300 Tb to throw at this?

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      On their torrent page it’s explained more but it’s broken up into many many torrents and you basically say how much space you’re willing to host and it generates one with the least seeded “blob”.

      I don’t really know how that would work on the back end but it seems technically impressive.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Given some of the collections I’ve seen on private trackers I’d say there is going to be quite a few seeding this in its entirety.

  • MattW03@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    99% of the “original” Spotify’s contents are crap or AI bloat. The rest was already on torrent before.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They break this down on their page, but while that’s certainly true-ish for the last year or two the bulk of the collection is from before that.

  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have 3gb of space to share. Are there 150 other people like me that want to do some distributed hosting? What technology can handle this?

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Torrents manage this without any extra tech. Just grab the .torrent file, and only select the files you have space for. Download them then seed, and get your 150 friends to do different files. If I then go to download a file that’s in your batch, the download will happen from your server (and whoever else is seeding these files), and if I go to download a file that’s on one of your 150 others’ server it’ll download from there.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yes, almost. But i want it to seem like i have all 400tb on my 3tb drive. I want the cache to handle downloads automatically and I want an even spread of files so that none get lost.

        Torrents give me:

        • Chunking
        • Redundancy via multiple seeders
        • Partial downloads

        But they do not give me:

        • A unified filesystem view
        • Automatic caching & eviction
        • Guarantees that every file stays available
        • Load balancing or placement control
        • A way to say “this file must exist on N peers”

        Maybe I should be typing this into a LLM.

        Edit: ChatGPT is suggesting an IPFS Cluster

        • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ahh fair enough! Yeah, not sure about all that.

          A very long time ago I remember there being FUSE filesystems that allow you to mount a .torrent like a network drive. I have no idea if these are still kicking though. Still doesn’t provide all of your extra bullet points but might be a good start to the rabbit hole

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Fuse looks like a good way to make the 3tb look like 400tb but it doesn’t do the replication bit.

            I’m commenting these ideas publicly because maybe others will join in. Thanks for playing along!

  • Zarajevo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I buy music on Bandcamp to support artists and then stream music via my own Plex server

      • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah it’s awesome, you get to spend all of your time chasing stupid issues like it picking the dumbest artist name possible and using it for 30 albums because one artist was on two of those albums, or deciding that 50% of your artists should be Lastname, Firstname but the other 50% should be Firstname Lastname. Then half the time it will use its own metadata for cover art and the other half it’ll use metadata in the files. Doesn’t matter how meticulous you are with your music tags an whether or not you have musicbrainz’d all of them to be consistent, it still finds a way to screw things up pretty much reliably.

        But it’s all worth it because PlexAmp is surprisingly good once you’ve done the legwork and fixed all the stupid shit and I would much rather buy music directly and self-host my own music streaming system than pay spotify monthly.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    But are the files high quality, or is it the same low bitrate garbage they send to their users ?

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In between

      It’s not in MP3, it’s Ogg vorbis and I don’t have equipment and time to have an informed opinion about how good Ogg vorbis is at any given bit rate.

      They claim usual people can’t tell between what they do and better bit rates. I know I’m picky so I know I’ll notice something.

      Remembering t this is Anna’s archive. The goal is preservation of human culture, not pirating.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        ogg is better than mp3 at lower bit rates. As they increase in bit rate they become indistinguishable.

        That said, this stuff is way too low quality to care about.

        • Sockenklaus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, Ogg Vorbis’s sucessor is Opus, which is amazing at low bitrates. That’s why they used 75 kbit/s Opus for all file with popularity = 0 opposed to the original 160 kbit/s Ogg Vorbis for all files with popularity > 0.

  • Emptiness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Moved to Tidal. Reviews from some tech-site said “It’s like Spotify 10 years ago.” as if that’s a bad thing.

    Loving the FLAC quality and non-enshittification.