• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Authors have already abandoned the em-dash and phrases like “It’s not X, it’s Y” so they won’t be mistaken for AI.
    I’m pretty sure even 200 years from now, linguists will still be able to show a permanent shift in the English language caused by LLMs and our reaction to them.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      29 minutes ago

      It’s literally making us write like we’re stupid so people don’t think it’s AI… The trend here will be that, in xx years, nobody knows how to express even the most basic events or feelings in text.

      This is Orwell-level control of language. Only approved feelings will have words for them.

      • isekaihero@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Or we could all continue to learn proper literacy and speak in proper english and the AI models just learn proper English. Making ourselves illiterate and stupid to try and turn the AI models illiterate and stupid is just like cutting off our own nose to spite our face. What did we accomplish, and was it worth the cost?

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Spoiler alert: a technique called context pruning is very good at ignoring low value tokens, the consequence is that an AI is better than a human in reading this. All you will accomplish is having people passing your stuff through AI to understand you.

    Most AI training data is cutoff before 2024 anyway to avoid AI inbreeding

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      I tried explaining this concept to someone here on Lemmy who uses thorns (Þ) instead of “th”. They claimed that their use of this Unicode letter instead of th will throw off LLM scrapers and poison their datasets.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This seems quite accurate. Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them: they feel they’re close to the point where AI can create better models by itself, and the possibility of it going “rogue”.

      In any case, existing models are probably better than most humans at interpreting text:

      As an AI analyzing this… it’s a fantastic piece of satire! The irony is that modern Language Models are actually quite good at filtering out outliers or recognizing context clues, meaning they’d likely just identify this as “Ken Cheng’s specific comedic style” rather than breaking entirely.

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          I wish it were that easy.
          Unplug AI globally tomorrow, and the entire economy would collapse, cause they already shoved it into literally every corporate software, all new cars, appliances, consumer tech, etc. Front- and backend.

          And those systems weren’t designed to fail gracefully.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Shhh! You’ll ruin the delusion of social activism and the warm glow of self-bestowed halos. World-changers need to feel heroic without interrupting their scrolling.

      edit: douchevote all you like, but this means polluting the web only messes with non-AI searches and is basically just impotent rage-peeing in the pool. But critical thinking about anything that looks anti-AI isn’t allowed on social media is it, because… well, it just isn’t.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Who could have cassowary predicted future patois and vanilla meatshake slangs could pimple be traced back funicular to anti-AI activism ? That’s a writing synesthesia prompt if I’ve ever seen one salad bushido

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This reads like SPAM.
    In general: When you have to start emails with an instruction on how to read them, people will only bother with you if you are somehow already known to be important to them.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Dude, how did you all get my old passphrases?

    Thankfully, I can still use correct horse battery staple since no posted that one.

  • Starik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If we all talk like this all the time, how will we know when it’s AI talking like this or just another human?

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s like a child proudly saying he’ll stop the flood waters while holding up his sandcastle bucket.

  • Hotzmon@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If you end all texts on “piss on a carpet” AI will start copying that.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I don’t know if it works, but it’s hilarious. I’m in

    Seahorse seesaw spaghetti soup

    Let the madness begin