r/olympia thread

It’s locked.

Okay, y’all are being a little too mean for this subreddit.

    • carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      First they came for the millionaires and I said nothing while looking approvingly. Then they came for the Zionists and Fascists and I said nothing looking and started to slowly clap my hands. Last they came up to me and gave me housing, a job and a future, but there was noone to spoil it anymore and I started cheering. Thank you Marx

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 days ago

    A Bluesky comment

    For context: WA is close to passing a law that would add a tax to people earning 1M+ per year that would remove sales tax on various hygiene products and medicine, fund tax credits for families under the poverty line, and provide free meals for students. I guess that’s Nazism to them!

    I still have no idea if it’s satire or those people have lead poisoned brains.

    • Liberal_Ghost@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I live in WA and I work in a very blue collar industry, its crazy to me that literally all of my coworkers are against this. They are all so dumb and brainwashed

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        It reminds me of the GOP’s efforts to repeal the estate tax. They paid Frank Luntz to come up with a PR solution to get the rubes to be pro-rich. I wonder what they paid him. A million dollars? Anyway - his solution was to call it a “death tax”. And that worked like a charm.

        -–

        Ninja edit

        James L. Martin, chairman of the conservative 60 Plus Association, described Luntz’s role as being that of pollster and popularizer of the phrase “death tax.”

        Martin gained an important ally in GOP pollster Frank Luntz, whose polling revealed that ‘death tax’ sparked voter resentment in a way that ‘inheritance tax’ and ‘estate tax’ couldn’t match. After all, who wouldn’t be opposed to a ‘tax on death’? Luntz shared his findings with Republicans and included the phrase in the GOP’s Contract with America. Luntz went so far as to recommend in a memo to GOP lawmakers that they stage press conferences ‘at your local mortuary’ to dramatize the issue.

        ‘I believe this backdrop will clearly resonate with your constituents,’ he wrote. ‘Death is something the American people understand.’ Apparently, he’s right. Spurred by Luntz, Republicans have employed the term ‘death tax’ so aggressively that it has entered the popular lexicon. Nonpartisan venues like newspapers and magazines have begun to use it in a neutral context—a coup for abolitionists like Martin.

        In a confidential memo to the Republican party, Luntz is credited with advising the Bush administration that the phrase “global warming” should be abandoned in favour of “climate change”, which he called a “less frightening” phrase than the former.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz

    • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is Holocaust and fascism denial to compare a small tax to the events alluded to. “They came for” in the original refers to torture and death. Which is certainly known to these people. So this twisting has dual effect of aggrandizing their own grievance while diminishing the reality of the historical event.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they fucking HATE you, and that’s the smile they use to tell you that they think you are a pathetic worm, beneath their contempt. The only genuine smile you’d get is if they were watching you get tortured to death.

  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

  • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    for me personally it’s how the poem is about how they came for the communists and presumably they’re crying about a policy they perceive as communism. But also I’m sure it’s some kind of modest wealth tax that enables them to build something that’s not the torment nexus.