For me it’s saying, “we can’t joke about anything anymore”. Sirens go off immediately 🚨

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anytime anybody tells you “I don’t do drama”, 99% of the time they are the cause of all the drama.

    Actually chill people pretty much never bring it up.

    • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      7 days ago

      On a related note: “I don’t see why you’d stop being friends with someone over politics”

      Especially these days with what basic human rights have been made political, politics is probably pretty high up there on my list of reasons I’d see in why not to associate with someone.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Politics are an extension of ethics so you kinda have every reason not to associate with someone whose moral compass is all fucked up (and so are their political takes).

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Depends on the country and the party. I won’t stop being friends with someone who disagrees with me about the best way to assure solvency of pensions (even if they support a private scheme), or how to best support transitions to clean energy, whether we should forbid the installation of gas heating or wait for the cost advantage of heatpumps to speak for itself.

        In some countries however the discourse is whether some people should be executed on the street or not if they displeased a thug with a gun, or if their choice of sexual partner is not of the liking of the government.

        • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah in less interesting of times I would much more understand where they’re coming from. That being said in this specific context it was the quoted person (person A) not understanding why a friend of a friend (B) would no longer speak to them after learning A voted for Trump multiple times.

          The subtext I was picking up from the conversation was that B (I assume) is one of many groups being specifically targeted by Trump so they refused to be in the presence of or communicate with someone who’s by proxy targeting them. A on the other hand just seems to see it all as politics and doesn’t understand what the big deal is about.

          In another country or in another time I could understand but given the time and place, their confusion came across to me as showing how oblivious they were to the policies they voted for, who was going to be affected by them, and how negatively they were going to be affected by them.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I totally would be good with someone not being friends with me due to my politics. It would be a great passive filter.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “I want my country back…”

    Yeah, so did all those places we invaded.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would sympathize with this one, honestly.

        I think we all (in the US at least) grew up with a very skewed and generalized / propagandized version of its history, one that’s specifically designed so we identify proudly with it. (I’d imagine most countries are similar on that last bit but idk)

        The more time goes on, the more atrocities come to light, the more insanely layered and nuanced and complicated it all is, it’s quite an overload with everything else we have to deal with as adults. (Especially when most of it is crap we can’t even do anything about.)

        The constant realizations that approach closer to the truth are often painful. Nobody likes realizing they were lied to so much in their formative years.

        Yeah, I too would like if my country was run by virtuous people trying their best, and if unknown badass action heroes stopped the bad guys, instead of living in an evil empire run by those bad guys, and if hard work actually meant something.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    7 days ago

    Corporate jargon outside the office. Hell, even in the office when it’s over the top.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Silent Majority”

    It’s always their go-to when pressed on when they’re called out.

    They can’t grasp the idea that their beliefs are really that unpopular so they cling to an idea of a “silent majority” that agrees with them but is either too censored or too bullied to speak up for what they think is the truth.

    Sorry buddy, there is no such thing as a “silent majority” quietly agreeing with you but afraid to speak up, you and your illiterate buddies are just assholes and your opinions are shit.

      • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        What a Americanocentric thing to say. What do you call centralism outside the US? I’m the middle?

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          TBF nobody does the 2 party system quite as 2 party as the Americans. At first I was inclined to agree with you and disagree with OP, but the more I think about Canadian politics the less enlightened centrism I see… Just conservative doofuses who view the world through tik tok.

        • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Centrism as it exists in its colloquial form often ends up referring to a bridge between Republican and Democrat ideas—both American parties. As the other comment said, no one two-party-systems quite like the US.

  • Scuzzm0nkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Guys who refer to women as “females”

    ninja edit - I see I’m late to this party

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Grown men getting extremely worked up about cartoons or woman in videogames.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    “There are not a lot of people like us out there nowadays.”

    This is a common MAGA comfort/greeting line they use when they meet new people.

  • l3enc@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    caring a lot about low birth rates and demographic shift (into an aging population). i have litereally never met a single person who’s reason for worring about these wasn’t just racism. when pressed enough their arguements almost always deteriorate into some variant of the nazi “great replacement” psueudoscience

      • m4xie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        That problem can be mitigated with immigration. Immigrants pay taxes and are entitled to the use of fewer social services.

        People that are opposed to this might be concerned about “great replacement”.

        Of course, a country’s current occupants have the right to have a family of their own (though not everyone should exercise that right) and their children should be able to grow up healthy and happy. The country should not descend into the wealthy 1% that can afford children and a rotating underclass of immigrants. That’s basically Saudi Arabia.