You must log in or register to comment.
Americans have a strange youth fetish. I guess that explains Epstein
She evolved from a stage 1 Pokémon into a stage 2 Pokémon.
Youth is overrated.
I disagree
I’m lost. She’s beautiful is in both, and so is he. Where is the part I’m supposed to be angry about? Boobs. Huzzah!
boobs 🫦
If you’re only with someone because of their looks, then yeah you shouldn’t get married. At least not until you grow up.
As an aside, I think she still looks good in the second photo.
My husband’s comment was “that’s silly. the whole point of marriage is to grow old together.”
My theory is that men who agree with this post can’t find any woman to marry them and this is just a way of them consoling their fragile ego.
Oh yeah, 100% guaranteed the man who said that is a gigaincel loser
i heard he really loves his wife
Architects know
I don’t.
Obviously the dude is an idiot but what is his proposal?
That you…stay a virgin forever?
Does he think you can just keep bouncing from 20 year old to 20 year old until you die? That’s not how anything works.
>>That you…stay a virgin forever?
I just don’t agree with one thing here. This is such a misconception… Staying virgin is nothing to be ashamed of
It’s not. Sorry for making it seem like that.
I was more trying to convey “well because women age I’m not going to participate at all”. And give it a “I’ll take my ball and go home”.
Toxic billionaire mentality. As the meaninglessness of this life style sucks into their bone marrows, they search satisfaction in more and more perverted things like molesting children in islands or sending women across the globe their sperm samples to get themselves impregnated with.
Rich and/or fame means that’s absolutely how it works.
That being said, OP(?) is right — his wife evolved some massive hodonnahonkeroos.
Edit: sorry not OP, what do you even call the commenter on the bottom in a post like this?
bouncing from 20 year old to 20 year old until you die?
DiCaprio seems to think so
Leonardo does that.
Yeah, but they did it differently during the renaissance.
What sad fuck, would post “let’s take this example of rare long-lasting, happy [celebrity] marriage, and find a shallow reason to dump on it”?
Every hollow minded person that follows stars lives via tabloids.
They’re perpetually single and need to blame happy people as to why they’re miserable.
I should be so lucky. <checks photos from 25th Anniversary last year> Oh wait. I am.
Found Pierce Brosnan’s lemmy account.
Found Han Solo’s lemmy account.
Found Wooly . . . Nelson’s . . lemmy account. ?
Found Jack the Ripper.
Found myself
@fartographer@lemmy.world found the Lindbergh baby!
Found Jimmy Hoffa
Crap!
His wife is still very attractive, but what if she wasn’t? It wouldn’t mean a goddamn thing, would it?
Beauty may be the reason why you are attracted to a person in the first place, but it’s not at the top of the list of reasons why you stay with a person.
It’s hard for me to even imagine being that shallow.
Miserable, pitiable folk who do not know what it means to love or be loved.
Thank you! I needed to see this comment, the whole premise of this post is icky to me.
Which makes you wonder why people even pick partners based on beauty. It would make more sense to pick them based on personality.
That being said, I value very much that my girlfriend takes care of herself even with many years in a relationship. She could easily become fat but she exercises and stays fit, and I do the same. For us its important, but its not the main reason we are together.
I suspect that humans evolved to pick partners based on beauty because beauty is an indicator of health.
Yeah on the surface level, it says genetics that will give a good looking body, and humans are attracted to beauty.
Which makes you wonder why people even pick partners based on beauty. It would make more sense to pick them based on personality.
Demisexual. Yes, we do exist. From anecdotal experience it’s mostly women who are demisexuals.
Guys face social pressure to avoid certain partners based on looks that they’d otherwise be fine with.
What are you talking about?
Demisexuals are likely more common among men than you realize but face intense social stigma if they date women who are fat or ugly. This is known to negatively impact men who prefer fat women for example and likely impacts demisexual men as well.
My steak is too juicy my lobster is too buttery…
Gonna need a salad at this point
Oh no! They’re pouring on a rich oily dressing! Noooooo!
pinchyyyyyyy!
Oh man that’s good! Tears
Tenacitaaaaas!!
Wtf.
Here’s a reminder to be a sociopath that dumps anyone once they hit 26.
Not everyone has the opportunity to love life so richly, but if you do it superficially it’s going be a shit run (and also you’d be shit too).
Find the person who makes you happy inside and return the favour.
I think the problem (among many) is he’s first not happy with himself. He knows he’s shit, but he’s not together enough to do something about it.
I would also like to point out the double standard. While this is a fine… I mean freaking fiiiiiine picture.
To the point the dumb shit was trying to make, there is a picture of Pierce Brosnan on a beach with a giant gut. Don’t see the dude posting that kind of shit.
It’s not this tweet, but I have seen people try shaming Brosnan over that.
There are unhealthy beauty standards set to both genders. They’re just geared differently. Women are suppose to be prizes and men are suppose to be warriors. Tate is the result of decades of masculine marketing and the exact thing the movie Fight Club warned about.
Look at what they did to Luke Skywalker toys over time.
Oh wow, look, it’s DefinitelyNotHeMan™!
It is exactly the Price Adam mold from the Masters of the Universe line repainted. Almost looks like one of those Asian market knock-off figures.
And the real tell is that the warrior ideal combined with super broad chest and shoulders are meant to denote strength, but the strongest men tend to be thick through the middle and lack the bodybuilder v-taper they give these toys. Not that bodybuilders aren’t stronger than most people by far, but when you look at the people who hold records for lifting the most weight they’re nothing like those toys. It’s just as shallow and dumb as a lot of women’s beauty standards.
but the strongest men tend to be thick through the middle and lack the bodybuilder v-taper they give these toys.
For example, sumou wrestlers! Built like tanks, hit like tanks.
Its highly ironic that both genders are failing at what they are supposed to be though. Women are not prices and men are not warriors. We know this. No?
Its just marketing. :)
If anything, the gender wars have shown how women can be just as awful as men. No gender is a price or warrior. We are just… People.
Men are ALLOWED to be fat though. It’s just the masculine swagger.
We are? I can attest that I most certainly am not allowed to be fat and get derogatory comments about it sporadically. I’m not even that heavy, I just got a growing beer gut and like 4kg overweight. Humans get shit for their looks, it isn’t compartmentalized across genders.
Fat would be a easy problem to solve. Try being ugly. :)
hair loss has entered the chat
The ugliest part of hair loss is the denial, accept and embrace it and you’ll own it.
I am currently halfway and am growing a mullet so ya got me there ;) big beard too
Oh man I feel you. I look good and still have hair, I just get shit for looking tired and fat. But society’s general aversion to baldness is very fucked up, and the girl power movement complaining about unfair ideals are all guilty of being just as bigoted against male issues like that one.
It’s as if we should all collectively be nicer and more tolerant towards one another regardless of sex, culture, color of skin or whatever, not just be upset when whatever particular demographic you happen to belong to gets shit. There are very valid positions to hold for, as example in case, feminism, but there is also a shitload of people who just proclaim themselves to be feminist and spew some sort of moral indignation while doing the exact same shit toward others.
It’s infuriating. Thanks for coming to my unsolicited rant. Try the crab salad.
Agreed, friend.
I myself hope to try being old some day
To paraphrase family guy “there are no fat men, only fat women”
I think it’s even worse than the double standard. Saying that people shouldn’t get married because some decades later your spouse might not be hot is infuriating to me. You’re with someone for decades - if the only reason you’re with them is because they were smoking hot at 25, you’re immensely shallow and immature. People get old. Age happens.
Seriously, who’s OOP? Leonardo DiCaprio?
If someone is with someone for decades because their partner was smoking hot at 25 either their partner is still smoking hot or there’s something else going on, because most people don’t stay the same level of smoking hot for decades. People who are with someone only for looks won’t stick around for decades.
