• Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Never trust a man in his 70s wearing a new shiny leather coat.

    Everybody knows this, right? It’s a general rule, like never accepting a ride in a white cargo van.

  • Darkness343@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I guess my next PC will have a Nvidia pro card instead of the cheap af GeForce made for poor people.

    /$

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I hope this looser and his little leather jackets get fired no golden parachute and lives the rest of his life working retail

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Rock stars doing this stuff somewhat makes sense, it’s all in good fun, and who hasn’t had a crush on some celebrity singer or actor?

      but a CEO? Seriously?

      • boaratio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sure, but as the CEO of one of the most valuable companies in the world, shouldn’t he think about how bad the optics of this are?

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          This feels like similar energy to getting outraged about a tan suit.

          Were all involved parties consenting? That’s the only thing that matters.

          Plus on the optics side, we’ve yet to see if being in the Epstein files is bad enough optics for CEOs, so I think “signed something on an adult woman’s boobs when she most likely specifically requested/offered it” is entirely a non-issue.

          • boaratio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Good luck with your morals. Glad you’re fine with billionaires flexing societal norms. Go sign them boobs in public.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Puritanical bs has nothing to do with morals, as much as some like to pretend it does. What harm are you trying to call out or prevent?

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  That’s the closest I’ve been able to think about for why people turn to puritanical values in the first place: jealousy that others can do fun things they think they can’t, plus maybe a second layer of being upset that some aren’t also upset about it.

                  Oh wait, I almost forgot about the control angle, where if you can convince enough people that some normal and ok aspect about humanity is actually wrong, then you can catch people “slipping” and manipulate them via guilt or blackmail.

              • boaratio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I know the meme is older than I am, but I’m clearly not going to win an argument on the Internet Enjoy your ambivalence.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          literally the coolest thing he’s done

          should sign more tits instead of begging people to stop complaining about AI, maybe stonk price would go up more

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Celebrating nvidias big investment in Israel didnt help either. Daily killing of innocents continues while he ships pallets of money over. He’s not unique in tech CEOs being arseholes, but he’s definitely another trash human being. The world would instantly be a better place without most tech CEOs.

            • IronBird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              eh, from a pragmatic business perspective…i see why they all bend the knee. capitalists are by their nature universal opportunists. they will show loyalty to israel up until the moment it looks like they don’t have control over the US’s collar, the moment that happens though they do a 180.

              same way so many “pro-lgbtq” businesses flipped to anti-dei narrative the second it looked more profitable.the only thing sacred under capitalism is your line going up, everything that doesn’t directly service that goal day-to-day is performative

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Yeah. Pretty fair analysis even though I dont enjoy that conclusion. I thought even capitalism was better than that. I would love to go back to my ignorant beliefs in the good of the common man again. And the basic instinct toward good of my fellow Americans. But you cant go backwards in life.

          • mbp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Closest this guy has ever felt to being a rockstar

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Hm gotta be honest, I don’t give a shit about optics, especially since that asshole is plenty bad regardless.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    The whole thing some like some giant check kiting scam or some weird looping Ponzi scheme. I’m going to invest money into your company so you can buy more of my products. Where is all the money coming from in the first place? Neither of these companies should be worth as much as they are.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This has got to be some sort of tax fraud at the very least. That or money laundering.

  • tio_bira@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hope Nvidia fcking brokes and back on his knees begging for his old clients who used to bought their gpus to buy the shitiest new version of the non improved but twice as expensive product.

    • other_cat@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Given how many scams have surged in recent years, I kind of agree with that parody statement.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    2 days ago

    The issue with lies, and any good liar will tell you that, is that once you lie you need to maintain that lie forever. You keep adding new lies, new layers, new context, and this house of cards becomes more and more convoluted, large, and fragile. It takes one piece to fall for everything to come down, yet, because everything is a chain of lies, you can’t stop.

    So imagine what happens when you take the most valuable GPU company and go all in on AI, creating insane investments into everything that happens to use those two letters, purposely entering into circles where one company invests into another that invests back into the same company.

    You can’t get out, you’re too far deep into the web of lies. You are so deep you must convince yourself with your own lies, because you added so many and everything is so fragile that your own mind is now an obstacle.

    Good fucking luck when it crashes down.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Can confirm. As far as my mom in 1998 knew, I didn’t have access to the internet. I needed the password to go on her Earthlink 56k internet account.

      I’m 42 now, and my mom STILL thinks I never knew her password.

      I’m 42 years old, and still remember it, because of how many times 15 year old me typed that in.

      I guess I don’t need to “maintain” that lie anymore. I can’t imagine a scenario where my 70+ year old mother will ask me about that exact situation, or why it would matter today.

    • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t have to lie forever! You could totally Santa Clause it. Like I did with my kids, and Santa Clause. 🤣🤣🤣

      Otherwise yeah fuck them.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Looks at numbers.

    Subtracts money being spent, from money being earned.

    Huh.

    Are you sure?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    We are officially at the denial stage of this developing economic disaster.

    At least they already fired everybody, in anticipation of their wild AI success. Hopefully, some of these companies will pivot, and figure out how to actually survive, and they’ll have to hire a lot of people to replace their AI.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of the “AI” layoffs were using it as a plausible excuse for layoffs they wanted to do anyway. So I don’t anticipate a lot of them coming back.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      See we keep getting told that AI is a great success and also a threat to humanity and that it’s going to take over the world in 5 minutes if we’re not careful. It has been literally years now and nothing has happened.

      If that isn’t evidence of a bubble I don’t know what is. But somehow the complete lack of any meaningful progress seems to convince people even more

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        LLMs like what is being overhyped cannot take over the world.

        They are not constant-thought processors. They are the most overbuilt autocomplete of all time.

        The “take over the world” problem is the capitalists who see dollar signs in automating away humans.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s OK, these stages are not supposed to be sequential. They can go through them in any order, and even cyclically return to other stages. Even full acceptance can be relapsed from time to time.

    • unlawful_combatant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the current capabilities were enough to eliminate some human jobs, then they aren’t coming back. Someone else will offer up a cheap ai solution when the giants fall as the open source and Chinese models catch up and surpass them.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        If ai allows the improvements hoped for, it’s likely to increase productivity for humanity just like all other major advances did.

        It’s politics and laws that decide who benefits from it. Under our current systems, wealthy people and corporations benefit, but likey we’ll see increasing taxes on ai output and increases in ubi type schemes for people.

        AI is a bubble currently but it is an advancement in tech that provides benefit. Just nowhere near the benefit to be actual intelligence.

        Human jobs get eliminated by new tech all the time. This just has and will be rapid, which leads to upheaval. Unfortunately, it’s precisely at a time when the world is already moving towards war and authoritarianism, so it’s particularly bad timing.