Mirror

Another video of the failed test and rocket explosion at the Yasny test site near Orenburg

Another version from Ukrainian OSINT analysts states, that the footage may show the launch of the UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missile with the “Avangard” unit.

https://files.catbox.moe/fytslz.mp4

  • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    26 days ago

    They should’ve consulted me. I have thousands of hours in KSP. They needed more struts. Possibly atleast two more boosters.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Sadly, the technicians that would have been able to prevent this were blown up by drones during a failed meatwave offensive in Ukraine last year.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      26 days ago

      It seems any time I read about some big Soviet (USSR) research/innovation/accomplishment, the scientists and engineers making those achievement were… Ukranian. Makes me wonder if Putin wants to conquer Ukraine to indenture all of that talent again because Russia has been stagnating since the collapse of the USSR.

      That’s just a theory of mine, take it as you will.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      27 days ago

      And all that unnecessary “maintenance” money was siphoned off to an offshore account in 1996.

      Who would have thought soviet ICBMs were so fragile!

    • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      26 days ago

      NATO propagandists will try to bury this footage because they don’t have a hypersonic missile that can turn in such a small radius like this. Besides that, with this newly demonstrated capability, the odds that Ukraine could shoot down this missile drop just about all the way to zero!

    • FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      No comerade, this video is actually fireworks in Russia. The Westoids are so jealous of our mighty fireworks they call it failed ICBM test.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    26 days ago

    I got over a thousand hours in KSP. The issue is the pointy end has to point at space without tipping over.

  • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    27 days ago

    Looks like the same issue I remember seeing on a different launch, I think also Russian, where a tech installed a sensor upside down. That thing had no idea where it was or was going.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I think that was 2013 Proton M launch.

      I tried looking up this video and at first AI kept adamantly demanding this is the proton m launch. But then a new convo and suddenly it agrees this is prolly 28 November ICBM test.

      But yeah the 2013 proton m spiraled hard

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Why does everyone like to turn the camera away when the thing is about to blow up?

    ICBM the cameraman

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      26 days ago

      Tbh, bar the little twitch at the explosion point it was very good camera work. Not moving too much and keeping it all in frame

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    4th October 1957: Launches first satellite into orbit.

    19th August 1960: Launches first animals into orbit.

    12th April 1961: Launches first human into orbit.

    Some time passes.

    Now: Whatever the fuck this was.

  • Atropos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Do these guys not have an emergency destruct? Or do they like dropping missiles on their heads, you know, recreationally

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      While this is just a test so I don’t know if it’d be the same, actual nuclear ICBMs have absolutely no remote cancel or detonation options at all.

      Introducing them would introduce the possibility of your enemy hacking them and detonating them to protect themselves, so they’re completely out of human control once launched.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    26 days ago

    Anyone speak Russian? Why do they constantly sound like they’re saying “yeah boy” I’m sure they’re not saying it just it sounds very similar

  • Nico198X@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    26 days ago

    i can’t believe that the West hasn’t conquered Russia during this shitshow. unbelievable.

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      26 days ago

      “The West” has no desire to conquer Russia. That is a lie that Russians tell to justify their aggression.

      • Nico198X@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        yeah, that WAS true, until Russia has been waging war against us for over TEN YEARS!

        Russia has created a self-fulfilling prophecy. they need to be dismantled, disarmed and re-educated.

        • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          What the fuck are you talking about. As if the actions of the Russian state are some democratic groundswell of aggression from the people.

          • Nico198X@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            i’m talking about reality. whether you like it or not, this is Russia’s war. it doesn’t stop at Putin. he is facilitated by the entire apparatus.

            • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              Yes, in the same way that Jahmal Kashoggi’s murder was facilitated by the ordinary citizens of Saudi Arabia, or chat control was facilitated by the ordinary citizens of EU nations, the ordinary Russian is responsible for the aggression towards its neighbors. Or are we perhaps talking about problems caused by politicians and oligarchs that don’t actually answer to anybody in a meaningful way

              • Nico198X@europe.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                like it or not, the complacency of the masses leads to all of this.

                if they’re all so anti-Putin like you suggest, they’ll understand that they’ll need to be occupied and disarmed after all of this.

                • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  Yeah obviously my beef isn’t with disarmament it’s with your comment about re-education, which means torturing and killing people. So we’ve still gone nowhere in this discussion.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      ‘The west’ is barely holding itself together right now; conquering another nation, particularly one the size of Russia, isn’t exactly in the cards at the moment.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        You can’t invade Russia. You might beat them enough that a settlement will be reached, and then, down the road, they’ll invade another relatively small neighbor. Rinse and repeat.

        The problem this time is that the “small” country is fighting back like a badger, and is supported, albeit dysfunctionally, by one of the coalitions capable of handing them their ass on a platter.