• 0 Posts
  • 225 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
















  • Atropos@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’ll affect it, but it won’t stop it. This is a good question to bring up though.

    I design medical devices. IP is incredibly important in this process to protect our R&D investment in the current system. If IP didn’t exist, we’d protect that through other means like obfuscation of function.

    Also if IP didn’t exist, I could design devices that are so much better at healing people. So much of what I do is restricted because someone else has 30 years left on what they patented.

    R&D is expensive. Just because you see what someone else did, doesn’t mean you can easily replicate it.

    In short: if your goal is pure profit, yeah removing IP probably hurts this a little. If your goal is producing the best product, then get rid of it.

    I think the best solution would be a much shorter exclusionary period for patents.