Anon was refused by a muscle mommy and is now on a holy incel crusade against them.
Or was pegged by one and liked it a bit too much
Pro tip: before getting yourself pegged make sure to make it clear you want her to be gentle with you, so you don’t risk having to question your sexuality.
If being attracted to buff women makes you gay, then gender is not as simple as this twitter gremlin probably believes it to be. But they probably don’t want to think about that too much.
“Not ‘normal’ = gay”. That’s all they consider.
Is this a new metric mental gymnastics, like it’s not gay if you’re on top, or if you are the giver?
As we (jokingly) say in German: „Nur der Gefickte ist schwul.“ [“Only the one getting fucked is gay.”]
That’s a surprisingly common line of reasoning actually.
new
I mean that particular piece of homophobia has been around since antiquity
I have a friend that says having muscles makes women too masculine. He was not amused when I asked him if that also means he is feminine because he doesn’t have any muscle (I don’t actually believe either is the case, just wanted to point out his hypocrisy)
“Men cannot become women, but muscular women are men.” 😅
Yeah, I don’t get what’s wrong with wanting a muscular physique.
Fucking chicks is definitely gay.
Not if you keep your socks on
This is a critical loophole that few fellas use to keep themselves free of gayness.
All the
homieslesbians agree.
Thx homie, but i have not the patience to watch ads.
So by this logic, it would be straight for him to fuck femboys? Sounds gay.
What’s more manly than a cock? Two cocks, that’s what!!
See the only good Steve Hughes bit.
“What do you mean gays aren’t manly? They fuck men! What do you want in a partner? ‘Soft… feminine~’ ‘Yeah well I wanna fuck a bloke. Or is that too hard for you and your pussy-loving mates?’”
Nahh. It’s totally a straight thing to do :3
Hey, if I’m straight and a femboy makes me hard then she’s a girl.
fellas, is it gay for a man to find a woman hot?
According to xitter, if the woman is very muscular, then yes.
I don’t quite understand why though.
right wing politics promotes rigid gender norms
including that only men should be muscular
so muscular women are masculine
and men attracted to a masculine person are gay
nevermind that these are the same people who want to rigidly define women by their gametes, chromosomes, or other biological characteristics (not how buff they are, or how masculine they present)
or that these are the same people who came up with the idea that everyone is straight to begin with (“gay” being a sinful behavior, nobody being born gay)
Xitter told me dating someone with XXY chomosomes is 50% gay and just one X chomosome would be Schrodinger’s gay
(/s for the tone deaf)
xitter
’nuff said
Dear alpha,
I tell you what to like and how to make love. If you disobey, you’re an omega and do not deserve affection.
I’m starting to think “alpha” is some kind of closeted dude psyop
Well, the original idea is based on the behavior wolves that are (strictly) kept in captivity; that porn writers yoinked into their fanfics… Raise your hands if you think thats applicable on you, I won’t be able to see it, but your surroundings should know that you are iffy!
you are iffy!
Or… yiffy?
The original original idea is based on a study about those wolves in captivity that was never peer reviewed/reproduced and was generally confirmed to be absolutely bogus bullshit.
…the book was very much so peer reviewed even at its publishment, the issue was: -that ‘the being kept in captivity’ was not underlined to the point and via words where layman could understand universally/ be in the point of deniability for spreading nonsense -was a great fucking book, loads of people read it before the author could actually withdrew it (he immediately started pleading with the publisher once it surfaced) and make it more explicit
Thanks for the explanation, always assumed it hadn’t been peer reviewed because that requires replication of the experiment most often.
It should, but it does not always require that, at least for some soft sciences. In my very niche field (German grammar and German language instruction) studies are almost never reproduced as part of the peer review process, though it is totally normal for people to publish new papers that are essentially reproductions of existing studies.
No, the peers do not necessarily have to spend a decade to repeat the study as there is no singular thesis, nor any experiment… They just look it over while playing with their existent or non-existent beards and if its their speciality then give their names that ‘yes, this checks out’
Oh I know, I’m just making mock of dudes who are being hella weird
Not necessarily, a lot of straight guys have insecurities. It’s not exclusive to LGBTQ+
Gotta love it when losers assume women aren’t on the internet. As a woman, OP is absolutely right - that muscle mommy can turn me gay whenever she wants.
Sounds like you’re already gay.
Nah, just half gay. But who knows what the future can hold.
Sounds like it’s more likely to be men like OOP who turn you gay then
Ironically, yes. If all men were like him, I’d have gone full gay long ago.
lesbian here, hhholy shit
Wait if you think she’s hot, does that make you gay, but that makes you straight. But if you’re straight and you think she’s hot then that makes you gay.
It’s confusing.
Here’s a trick solve your confusion: if you could choose what’s in those pants, how long would it take you to make a decide: if you instantly know you want what’s in your own pants youre most likely gay, if you know instantly you want exactly what’s not in your own pants you’re most likely straight, if you need a moment before you know you’re likely not straight nor gay. All the other reasons you can think of aren’t about sexuality as in what gender do you like but are about sexuality as in what kind of person you want to be with. But it might also be a little more complicated than this.
You were the target of LeanBeefPatty’s psyop, and it worked.
Cis straight here, same
deleted by creator
Yepppp
Look if that makes me gay then sure, I’ll be gay
These people are so strange. We live in this big, complex world filled with variation, and they are like: “No! Everything must be only one way!”
Appreciating the spectrum of human experience is GAY
Realizing that emotions aren’t and can never be binary is HOMO STUFF
The complexity is too cognitively taxing so instead of just accepting that there will be people you don’t understand, they want to force everything to a strict mold they can easily comprehend, without needing to confront contradictions inherent to the human condition. Letting go of control and accepting the world is far beyond your capacity to fathom is a scary thing. But what is life but the act of letting go?
No, they want only two! They can’t handle it if everyone is the same, or if there is a rainbow of ways. To them, it must be two, no more or less! It must be binary!
Edit: This is a very boring grey lenses to view our species. Our closest relatives is bonobos…
It is however a psyop to make women gay
Is it working @captainlezbian@lemmy.world?
Bros jealous of her gains.
I know I am.
Just want to acknowledge that she’s put a heap of effort into that body and if I was lucky enough for her to want to snap me in half then old mate can call me fast if he wants.
Leanbeefpatty is also actually natty, which I think is why I still find her hella attractive despite the fact that she could probably snap me like a twig.
Steroids are effective, but I personally don’t usually like what they create.
Death by Snu Snu
Conservatives truly are the most bitch-made motherfuckers in existence.
For being so proud of being straight they seem very insecure about their gender and sexuality and love homoerotic media.
It’s almost like they’re repressed
Republican Convention and Grindr spikes.
Name a more iconic duo
If reecethebrah sees a muscular woman, and the first thought he has is “THIS IS A PSYOP TO TURN MEN GAY,” then maybe he’s telling us more about how the inside of his head works than about the secret homosexual / female body building conspiracy that has been hiding in plain sight this entire time.
I reckon the tattoo isn’t helping. Clearly if you’re part of a conspiracy you would have an Illuminati tattoo, it’s just required.
