• 1 Post
  • 134 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2025

help-circle
  • There’s a number of problems with this.

    It would only work if enough communities and instances adhered rigidly to similar editorial decisions about what is “political”. I don’t think that’s achievable.

    Mods would have to do the heavy lifting in tagging/ untangling things.

    It’s not going to be as simple to implement as you think.

    Posts are already categorised by community. You can block the vast majority of political posts by blocking a few communities and users.

    At times if filtered out keywords like Musk and Trump. You don’t really need to implement a feature for this. Just get posters to include a tag in the title of their post.

    Looking at your other comments, you’re not going to be deterred by these criticisms, so my suggestion would be to find the git repo and create an issue to get some proper feedback from other contributors.





  • I don’t think the SPF / DKIM / DMARC stuff is overly complex nor the core of the problem.

    In my case it was recipients with bonkers microsoft exchange servers that just had weird ideas about who should be sending them emails.

    For example, one thing that tripped me up forever ago was grey listing. Apparently the receiving server just wouldn’t acknowledge the sending server for an arbitrary period of time, say 12 hours or so. Spam senders would usually give up long before then, while a legit server would keep trying because it’s legitimately trying to deliver an actual email.

    So my email-in-a-box type self hosted set up was fine really. Compliant you might say. But to send emails to this one in a thousand recipient I had to investigate what was going on and reconfigure things to ensure their server would interact with mine.

    Another thing that can happen is that spammers just put your email address in the “from” field and fire off a few million emails. Obviously the DKIM signatures and SPF won’t match but it still just makes your future legitimate emails look spammy. Having the credibility of a larger organisation goes a long way in this type of instance.


  • I’m absolutely in the “don’t self-host email” camp. That said, I think it could be done reliably if you wanted to use someone else’s SMTP server and let them worry about deliverability. As in, have your mx records on your domain route to your MTA and dovecot, but set your DKIM and SPF records to match a third party SMTP server. You could use mxroute as an SMTP server very cheaply. There are others like the email API type services. I still can’t think of why I’d want to self host with all this drama but just an idea I’ve heard.



  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoPrivacy@lemmy.worldPlease, don't!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sorry chief you might have embarrassed yourself a little here. No big thing. We’ve all done it (especially me).

    Check out huggingface.

    There’s heaps of models you can run locally. Some are hundreds of Gb in size but can be run on desktop level hardware without issue.

    I have no idea about how LLMs work really so this is supposition, but suppose they need to review a gargantuan amount of text in order to compile a statistical model that can look up the likelihood of whatever word appearing next in a sentence.

    So if you read the sentence “a b c d” 12 times you don’t need to store it 12 times to know that “d” is the most likely word to follow “a b c”.

    I suspect I might regret engaging in this supposition because I’m probably about to be inundated with techbro’s telling me how wrong I am. Whatever. Have at me edge lords.











  • No, not “more than”, or “as often as”, but more often than you seem to think.

    In Australia it’s uncommon for someone to stay home exclusively with the kids for more than a year or so. Usually that’s the mother because she’s recovering from giving birth, breastfeeding et cetera.

    Thereafter one parent works full time while the other works part time. In this phase it’s usually about income. Whoever can earn more works full time. That’s usually dad that’s working full time, but certainly not always.

    Dad doesn’t need to be castrated and wear a frock or whatever to stay at home. In cases where mum and dad earn similar money dad might take back year off to stay home with the kids while mum works or something.

    I don’t expect you to believe me, but since you seem to be marvelling at my extensive real world experience, I’m a tax consultant.