cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/40905844

With some prominent Democrats and liberal pundits arguing for the party to try to win Elon Musk back to its side, you have to ask: Is American politics simply a matter of who can best kiss the ass of narcissistic reactionary billionaires?

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the US to apply the Chinese approach.
    Has anyone heard from Jack Ma lately? Is it really a bad thing?

  • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Is American politics simply a matter of who can best kiss the ass of narcissistic reactionary billionaires?

    Always has been.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    We should make sure his life is a living hell at any post he moves to. Make sure anything he touches fails just like Tesla and make sure he can’t have any more kids.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I misread the headline and thought it was a cautionary statement, explaining that elon musk was going around “woo-ing” at people, and you should (under no circumstances) “woo” back.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He could be a useful tool too disassemble the corrupted administration. We just lack a sufficient craftsman to wield him, and sufficient balls to dispose of him afterwards.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I hope he actually does create another party and split the Republicans, ensuring that none of them win another election ever again.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Be careful, Hillary tried to create an easy opponent too. If we’ve learned anything from 2024, it’s that desperate people will vote for any change. Even if that change is bad.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The whole bifurcated party thing cuts both ways though. The vast majority of the even slightly progressive people are sick and tired of the Democrats handholding with the Republicans only narrowly being the least appetizing item on the menu. There’s nobody standing for the people. Everybody’s standing for the oligarchs. I’m not saying I would vote Republican ever, But we’ve got to be able to do something relatively better than whatever this is we’re doing now.

        The Republicans would split on fiscal versus “morals”. Immorally progressive fiscally conservative party to rapillase the publicans might draw a number of the wealthy Democrats with it.

        There are other countries out there that do a better job. And it’s quite clear now that our Constitution does not have the teeth It was designed to have.

    • Rancor_Tangerine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Seriously. Dems need to get over the endless purity tests. Where that old meme with the communist kangaroo anyway?

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      useful tool

      Why? Based on what, exactly?

      The guy is an absolute drug addicted idiot with no skills or empathy anywhere. He got lucky multiple times leading him to where he is today, but he’s always been a lying sack of shit who only is a multi billionaire because of luck and a loooooot of lying.

      What, exactly, would make that a useful tool for anything?

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s a fucking Nazi. If you try to woo him, you are too. This isn’t rocket science dem dipshits, you’re supposed to be something beyond a fundraising org.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    With him leaving the way he did literally nobody in the country likes this man and aiding with him in any way is political suicide.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s so embarrassing to watch democrats constantly groveling for money.

    It’s telling that the leaked audio of the DNC vice president fracas had the establishment guy (Mike Miquetoast or something) whine to David Hogg that he wanted to get back to the real business of fundraising.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      The real hard work done in government. The real actual change in the world. The real benefit to the country at large.

      FUNDRAISING

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing that shocked me… I was fully expecting that kind of BS ideas from say Jeffries, Schumer, Newsome etc…

      But then looking at it the one I’ve seen talking about it was… Ro Khanna, which was one I considered in the “overall tollerable” side of the democrats.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    This illustrates the issue of having only 2 political parties. You used to have left and right. Then the right extended all the way to batshit crazy nazi while losing touch with the centre-right, and it collapsed to keep only t̂he nazis. Meanwhile the “left” extended to centre then all the way to the economic right.

    Now you have a nazi party and an everything else party, and people ask the last to “get their shit together”, as if socialists would sort out their differences with neo-liberals and conservatives over a quick diner and build a common ground plan.

    That just can’t work.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It also accentuates the need for ranked choice voting or something similar. You need to give a people a way to say what they want to say with nuance and power. If everyone says they wish they could vote for someone else but need to vote strategically then parties never need to be good and can just thump on about defeating the evil party.

      Yes, I’m from Canada and vote NDP, how did you know?

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        But so you know well that a party committing to change the voting system will have a change of heart after realizing the current system brought them to power. (I’m in Canada too ;) ).

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Of course, and how we force the issue I don’t know. I wish people would just stop strategically voting altogether because it only delays, and grows, the issue but that’s a lost cause. Not that I don’t continue to fight that fight but I know that winning people over toward voting in their best interests isn’t the way.

  • Washedupcynic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    They should not try to win him back. They should deport his bitch ass to mars on one of his own rockets.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    From the DNC’s perspective: yes, yes it is.

    It would be far better for the Pelosis, Fettermans and Newsoms to have photo-ops with a 8647-cap-wearing Musk and talk about tax cuts and deregulation and shiny crypto AI sci-fi futures, and to keep rolling in cash from billionaires expecting to see their good fortune continue, than to be forced to heed the views of the AOCs and alienate their sponsors. This way, at least the gravy train keeps rolling.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I can’t remember where but there was specifically a complaint by a DNC person that the people were donating more money than the corporations were. Like, it’s not even the money, they just want the excuse to keep being shitty.

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Smart play would be to manipulate him into opposing the cunts in congress. No need to take a single dollar in campaign contributions. Just goad him into forming a PAC opposing repub spending. Split the degenerate vote.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I UNDERSTAND where the DNC Leadership is Coming from! If they WOO Musk then they Might LOSE the Next Election but STILL be Rich (for the Time Being!)! And if they WOO people like AOC they might WIN MULTIPLE ELECTIONS while being SLIGHTLY less Rich (forever!)!

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    To bad. Money talks. Huge advantage. Take what we can get. It’s immoral to make terrible strategic choices when the consequences of losing is letting Nazi 2.0 take power.

    Just make the deal where he has to fund a small Navy to send aid to Palestine.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      in the 2024 election the RNC raised 390 million, dems raised 548 million. Dems still lost. The old consultant wisdom that whoever raises the most money wins no matter what didnt work.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s crazy I didn’t know that. But I think of funding. I think of funding grifters like heritage foundation, TPUSA, people’s careers like Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Tim Pool whoever amplifies.

        There’s not much on the left. Unless it’s a former Republican who is now anti Trump.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      let’s work with the Hitler salute guy who explicitly donated a bunch of money to buy access and spent months using that access to cripple the government for decades to come.

      So the solution to defeat Nazi 2.0 is to cater to Nazi 2.1?

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re a Nazi regardless if you believe that. But also no doesn’t work like that. That’s a pretty dramatic take. He’s a drugged out idiot. His salute bullshit was trolling at the worst. Let him fund things. You don’t need to invite him into your house for a beer. The actual Nazis are in government right now in key positions hiring strategically. We’re so far up shits Creek. It’s just like any of you fucking people are funding anything on the left.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You’re not giving him anything. He’s paying. How does that make you the quisling. If you’re using WWII knowledge. That was is fillled with examples of strategy over some made up head up our ass moral superiority. Take advantage especially capital in a capitalist world. Especially a capitalist with massive signal boosting capabilities. Tired of fucking losing with you people.

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                The fucking world is burning and I partially blame the left for ineffective and incompetent strategies and ideals. In my life, the left has a decent hold on things. Every year things improved bit by bit. But then the Internet came and it became clearer and clearer things changed. Instead of adsorption adapting the left just lost and continued to lose and never once has been critical of why they have been losing. It’s always how others are just dumb or rich.

                • FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So you want to double down on neoliberalism, which is mainly the reason why Dems keep losing? You’re as much as a genius as Musk.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You seem to be mistaking the Democrats for “the left” when they are in fact a party of right-wing moderates.

                  I’d advise looking up Douglas McCarthy for some historical perspective on why there is no “left wing” in American politics.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You’re not giving him anything. He’s paying. How does that make you the quisling.

              Depends, is he going to put out a press release and leverage his “donation” to whitewash his reputation or is it going to be anonymous and with no strings attached?

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                That’s on us and the Democrats. The Democrats probably will but who cares, they’re fucking garbage anyways. Are you about to suck him off or anyone else? Probably not.

                But does he want in and can fund lots of shit. Fuck yea he can. Operation paperclip his ass. Bring him in. Have him donate to Harvard, fund some Mercs to get aid into Palestine. Hell he is a troll, have him buy all the properties around Trump’s properties and build them higher than his. Who fucking cares. Capital is good. Capital does things. We’ve already lost everything. Take the W when we can.

        • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The problem is that if he funds things he’s going to trying to influence things to go to the right. He hates “woke”, believes white genocide is a threat, believes in suppression of free speech, hates regulation, etc…

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t think he believes any of those things. He’s a capitalist. He doesn’t care because those are rules. Rules do not apply to the rich like him. They’re just pieces on a game board they move around. He wants attention. Take advantage. Convince him to aid Palestine and they’ll all be eating cyber trucks in a week.

            • 10001110101@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              He absolutely believes in those things, and has shown multiple times he’s willing to light his money on fire to support his ideals. He’s idealistic (adjacent to the neo-fascist Dark Enlightenment movement), and not just simply motivated by wealth.

            • Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              As a believer of white genocide there’s no way we can convince him to aid Palestine. Supporting Ukraine again, maybe.

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think guys like him can be convinced to action with some very petty motivations. But we just need methods to motivate

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t care end of the day. The way you all get wrapped up over shit that doesn’t matter is crazy. The guy is trying to be 4chan irl. You people call everybody Nazis. He’s just a troll. He doesn’t have enough moral conviction to be a Nazi. He’s just a drug addict

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its bad strategy and the thing that Democrats really need to learn right now: Money doesn’t win elections.

      3x+ fundraising for Harris. Loss.

      Musk drops millions on judicial race. Loss.

      People win elections. You are just wrong about money.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Money doesn’t win elections alone. But it’s like 90% of what it takes to win. A politician spends most of their year canvassing for funds. That is why Washington is majority call centers for these politicians. Look it up. It has the most call centers per capita because they all cold call donors for funding.

        The left needs content. Content creators need funding. People don’t win elections. Money wins elections. If money didn’t win elections, the deliverables Democrats would have a higher success rate. The left is circling the drain. It’s not the 1900s anymore. A political group made up of poor angry young people isn’t going to be able to punch as hard against the authoritarian forces that exist today. You can’t just freak out and burn cities. You need subversion and better strategy. It all costs money. The left on all fronts has lost. There’s no coming back especially with the awareness some of them have. They do the same thing every year and act like it’ll work while also crying about how bad it’s become. But it’s never them it’s always the mean rich people. Well maybe being rich has something to do with their success and victories over the past could decades.