• GHiLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 hours ago

      Hobbyists have made Pokemon clones in their basement for decades. They never needed the source code.

      If I’m not mistaken, there’s an entire online RPG ran by hobbyists.

      • @okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 minutes ago

        Maybe this was an intentional leak. Now the Nintendo lawyers can claim they’ve used stolen proprietary code?

  • @Wolfram@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Good. Couldn’t have happened to a worse company other than Nintendo.

    Now people can verify if Gamefreak’s excuses for not including all Pokemon in each game since the Switch games are real. And verify how low effort their games are.

    • @HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 hours ago

      Nintendo aren’t the worst company. Not even the worst gaming company. Not when they have competition like Ubisoft and Warner Brothers and EA and Activision.

      Of course, if it weren’t for the presence of the aforementioned companies, Nintendo would be the worst.

      • @Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 minutes ago

        I mean they take like 33% of that guy named bowser’s life earnings. Which are severely reduced because they also got him thrown in jail for a felony.

        That’s pretty uniquely evil

    • @DesolateMood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 hours ago

      Source code is only for HG/SS and B2W2, so we still can’t verify anything about the newer genes

    • @goferking0
      link
      English
      33 hours ago

      Now people can verify if Gamefreak’s excuses for not including all Pokemon in each game since the Switch games are real. And verify how low effort their games are.

      Wasn’t it true, but due to time not technical issues. Basically they keep redoing/remaking from scratch sprites instead of re-using them.

      • @Wolfram@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Evidence wouldn’t be as concrete as source code, but there was plenty of evidence from data miners. Gamefreak kept moving goal posts when it came to why it wasn’t feasible for Sword and Shield to have all the Pokémon which is my frustration with that situation. I think they complained about the capacity of the cartridge the games were stored on was one, which was readily proven wrong. Dont quote me on that. But I do think the situation with the models was ultimately the case.

  • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1248 hours ago

    Next headline “Hackers disappointed that the hacked source code is apparently just the same as the last 16 games”

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      377 hours ago

      You can’t patent code, and it’s automatically copyright protected. Nintendo just needs to prove they wrote the code originally, which should be easy.

    • @HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 hours ago

      Sort of. The same game, over and over, each time in a different colour, each time with a higher pixel density, each time a little bit worse.

  • @yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    249 hours ago

    Also design documents like the dude that mated with an octillery lol. The concept of people and pokemon breeding was still referenced in sinoh, but in a way tamer way.

  • @misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9912 hours ago

    In my head this is a retribution for financing hackers that attacked Internet Archive and nobody can convince me otherwise

    • @ronflex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      259 hours ago

      This is a conspiracy theory I’m completely behind. With all the moves Nintendo has made recently this was the first thing I thought when Internet Archive was compromised

      • @misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        It’s like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit… And, uh… You know, you’ll, uh… You know what I mean.

        The Dude

        „Who benefits the most” from attacking Internet Archive? Big copyright holders whose content was distributed via Internet Archive. The reason given by the group claiming responsibility is so silly I don’t believe it.

        [edit] I’ll add to this comment so that I don’t have to reply to everyone specifically.

        I don’t believe that if you wanted to attack USA (as people claiming responsibility did) you’d attack it in a way that benefits big corporations most. It sounds like a flimsy distraction from true perpetrators.

        • @pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 hours ago

          You can believe what you want, but there’s absolutely no way you would be correct. Any large company sponsoring a cyber attack, if caught, would be nailed to the wall and made an example of. The extreme risks are simply not worth the comparatively small reward of reducing a tiny fraction of piracy.

          A more realistic and reasonable avenue would have been to sponsor the companies going after IA for copyright infringement as a result of them loaning out unlimited digital copies of books without DRM.

          • @misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            108 hours ago

            This is a very valid point, yet companies do shady stuff all the time and some even get caught via subpoenas and such. Nintendo can do it in a way that will never be noticeable on their books for sure.

          • Dettweiler
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1412 hours ago

            That’s what I’m seeing, unless a documented source eventually shows up.

            • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -20
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              A documented source has shown up and its already been dismissed it as “silly”. Unlikely any future sources would change their mind.

              • @misk@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1712 hours ago

                There’s motive and circumstances. Nintendo opened every possible front in the last year or so. Now this happens. Even if not related to IA specifically this definitely looks like retribution.

                Also, please read my first comment again. I think I made it clear it’s speculation.

                • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1711 hours ago

                  please read my first comment again. I think I made it clear it’s speculation.

                  Interesting, I got quite the opposite impression. And no one can convince me otherwise.

                • astrsk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1311 hours ago

                  … nobody can convince me otherwise

                  Ignorance isn’t something to be proud of.

  • missingno
    link
    fedilink
    159 hours ago

    I’ve been holding onto a pet conspiracy theory that BW2 was a last-minute change from Gray, loose ends and plot holes felt too rushed. Curious if the leaked source code will corroborate this.

      • @ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 minutes ago

        I know you’re being downvoted, but I had the same thought. I see more outcry over nintendo than other companies. Yes, Nintendo has done bad things, but if I were to go back and browse Reddit I feel like the level of hate on Lemmy is much higher. I have to assume it’s due to the open source nature of Lemmy and it’s ideals.

      • pancakes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 hours ago

        That’s like whining that everyone hates Blizzard or Ubisoft because of some hive mind mentality. Could it be that maybe it’s just a commonly hated company based off their unethical actions over the last 10+ years?

        • @Jomega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Here’s the difference though: most people outside of Lemmy don’t care about Nintendo’s copyright lawsuits enough that it’s the only thing they talk about whenever they hear the name. The fact that every comment expresses the same thing is the part that feels like a hive mind. Some criticism of a large corporation is one thing, but how strongly Lemmy holds that opinion feels cultish. Blizzard’s leadership protects sex abusers and Ubisoft has had a work culture many describe as nightmarish for decades. Seeing Nintendo put on that level for something not even unique to them makes me think some of you don’t know what nuance or perspective are.

          • pancakes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I disagree. Nintendo isn’t just some company that has legal beef and comparing their shitiness with Blizzard’s is like comparing apples to oranges.

            Nintendo is a litigious bully and patent troll that has a long, long list of hurting the fans that love their games. They don’t just settle for cease and desists, they historically ruin people’s lives (see Gary Bowser). What feels even worse about Nintendo is the complete misaligned of their product/ brand vs. how they treat fans. You can point to similar companies like Disney and I say that yes, I would happily cheer on any misfortune that comes to them with the same fervor as Nintendo.

            • @Jomega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 hours ago

              comparing their shitiness with Blizzard’s is like comparing apples to oranges.

              That’s… what I said.

              My point is supposed to be that Lemmy acts as a though they’re the devil, when in reality they’re just the regular amount of corporate shitty. All of what you said is true, and I’m not trying to convince you it isn’t. It just feels surreal how every comment in here is the same, like it’s the same person behind every username. I get no sense of individuality here, ya know ?