• Graphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ugly people make music all the time.

    You really gonna tell me Ed Sheeran is good looking? Post Malone?

    • swim@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.

      • Graphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Did we read the same post?

        Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

        I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.

        Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.

        • swim@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.

          The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”

          Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Pop is just as manufactured and fake as it always was, with the exceptional trend setter or two doing their own thing, but what’s just below the surface is always just as good as it always was.

    As a fan of hardcore, electronica, folk, metal, and all of the genres that fall under them, I still get new bands. I still get new releases. I get cheap as fuck concerts and still get cool merch and awesome vinyls. I have zero to complain about. Hell, Primus, A Perfect Circle and Puscifer just made an album together, in 2024.

    Anyone who says music sucks now doesn’t really listen to that much music to start with. Music is just fine, man. Maybe look a little deeper than the pudding skin.

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have had a 50/50 success rates. The ones who are bad are REALLY bad. To make up for it, they crank the gain, volume, and distortion to 11 and just annihilate everyone’s eardrums.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Exactly. I wish these types of posts would change “music these days” to “pop these days” because that’s what they’re talking about.

      It’s debatable when pop actually began but pop as we know it really codified in the 80s with dawn of MTV and acts like Madonna and Michael Jackson. The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Queen, etc were popular but I wouldn’t classify any of this as Pop. Pop has always been pretty people because it was by its nature tied to a visual medium.

      People need to stop using Pop as a stand in for all music. We have more access to music than ever before and a lot of the music I listen to regularly, I have no idea what they look like.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hear you and agree with much of that. I am a fan of multiple genres as well. But, as far as it goes for jazz, jazz is dead. Anyone still attempting to play it is often a sad version of what was once great in the 50s/60s/70s. So while there’s plenty of music in other genres I like, always more to find from those time periods, as well as still enjoying the classics, it’s a little upsetting good jazz is dead, modern jazz is trash, and people who think they know jazz these days actually refer to some other genre, like rock. Somewhat sad.