Eh, not sure “obvious joke” describes it.

The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.

Best practice is to put the independent variable on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis. That way you can read the graph left to right instead of bottom to top.

But yes this graph is wrong as drawn, unless it’s implying backwards time travel.

Here’s the graph with the axes (and data) flipped to match the time-on-x-axis convention. See the horizontal zig-zagging? Time doesn’t behave that way.

This graph specifically doesn’t work, see the dips? That implies going backwards in time, and then forwards again

It’s me

I’m still on my first read through, I’ve been going roughly by sub-series. Started with the Rincewind stuff, then Death, then the Watch, now I’m in the Industrial Revolution. Had a little Witches and other miscellaneous tossed in the middle there.

Some people like cupcakes better. I, for one, care less for them.

Second Tom Lehrer

Finished Going Postal by Terry Pratchett, on to Making Money

I didn’t expect to like the City Watch books as much as I did.

B.Y.O.B.

Why do you always sit in the corner?

It’s a fascinating subject

This is my wake-up playlist

Same shit as always

My sentiment exactly. Every Christmas I get more junk I don’t need, or stuff that I do need, but would have rather researched myself. I hate having a bunch of random knick-knacks and novelty items cluttering up my house, but I also feel guilty getting rid of gifts.

Don’t buy me gifts, don’t bring me souvenirs, I don’t need more novelty t-shirts.

And then there’s the rotation applied to Dinah Mo Humm’s sugar plum

Do not cite the deep magic to me witch, I was there when it was written

Who else is fine with pretending it does if that results in fewer circumcisions?

Flat paint primer, gives me chills to touch

You’re looking for ‘How to Kill a Mockingbird’, which is a very different piece of media