Continuing with the rise in anger towards wrong think on world, it’s now uncivil to post negative Biden articles.

Shockly that comm looks just like r/politics now

  • Diva (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    657 months ago

    The libs have been unbelievably touchy about getting called blue maga lately

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Because the more self aware ones know it’s true, and it grates on the edge of their minds.

      There are more than a few liberals who know Biden is terrible, who know that ‘vote blue no matter who’ is idiotic, but having to confront why those things are unpleasant is deeply uncomfortable. Realizing that legitimizing ‘lesser evilism’ as not just a minor harm reduction tactic but instead as the overarching aim of your supported political party is abhorrent.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    1. Can I still post negative stuff about Biden? Absolutely! We have zero interest in running an echo chamber.

    gee, what’s a chilling effect?

    However, if ALL you’re posting is negative, you may want to re-think your priorities.

    maybe Biden is only doing bad shit

    You get out of the world what you put into it and all that.

    historical idealism

  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    537 months ago

    The problem isn’t that they posted negative articles about Hitler, we don’t want to run an echo chamber or anything. The problem is they only posted negative articles about Hitler, and admited they wanted others to also be negative about Hitler.

    Why all the negativity? Is that really what you want to put out in the world?

  • erik [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    527 months ago

    Forcing all our users to engage in equal air time laws that don’t even apply to major news corporations any more. This is all very normal.

  • Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    497 months ago

    I wonder if Lemmy.world’s Red Scare will result in more leftists leaving .world, and more Liberals from Reddit replacing them, creating a schism between Lemmy.world and related instances, and Grad/Hexbear/.ml. a sort of Multipolar Lemmy.

    • @goferking0OP
      link
      English
      437 months ago

      I’m curious how long it will take until world just defeds from everyone for that reason

    • Leon_Frotsky [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      ngl i think its kind of unlikely, maybe a few people will but we wont see any real numbers leaving unless something big happens like .world defeds .ml or the instance just breaks and even then i doubt that many people will leave

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        Looking at it dialectically, I can’t see this cold war lasting forever. Eventually the contradiction will be resolved, some inciting incident will cause it.

        Might even be now, finally.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    437 months ago

    Absolutely! We have zero interest in running an echo chamber

    Unban lenins2ndcat then. All I ever did was promote communism.

    Presumption of innocence.

    Unban lenins2ndcat then. All I ever did was promote communism.

    If someone pumped the gas and was posting dozens and dozens of pro or anti Trump stuff? Yeah, I think I’d do the same.

    Bull fucking shit that’s literally all the liberals do, endlessly. Day after day after day. I’m ok with it because Trump’s a dickhead but come the fuck on stop being such dirty fucking liars while at the same time claiming this is about the person you’re banning not being in “good faith”. Holy shit.

    • @DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      Unban lenins2ndcat then. All I ever did was promote communism.

      Oh! You’re Lenins2ndcat? I need to thank you so much then! Without you talking to me several years ago back on reddit, I never would’ve actually become an ML and would’ve probably been one of those smug lemmitors complaining about the tankies.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        Yep that’s me. Was this a chat? I had a loooooooooooooooooot of chats 1 on 1 with users on reddit.

        • @DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          A brief chat and a few public comments, I don’t expect you to remember a 5 minute conversation 5 years ago, but just letting you know that you do make a difference doing what you do. :)

          • Awoo [she/her]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            Was it in r/therightcantmeme? I feel like I was at my most active (and hated by libs) during that period.

  • loathsome dongeater
    link
    fedilink
    English
    417 months ago

    What’s the acceptable good:bad ratio for reporting on a dementia-addled septuagenarian perpetrating a genocide in Palestine after having done cool shit in past like thr crime bill and going on a segregationist tirade against bussing in the congress?

    • emizeko [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      love to fight for reproductive rights by supporting the guy who voted against reproductive rights in 1982 and did nothing to stop them from being eliminated on his watch

  • Barx [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    417 months ago

    In usual lemmy.world form their explanation makes no sense and is even hypocritical. They say the poster admitted to bad faith engagement and provide a link, supposedly as evidence for this. The link is just the modlog saying they were banned for bad faith engagement, lol.

    Sorry babe, I just banned you for racism. My evidence? Check out my ban message it says “for racism” right there.

    They also suggest that you’re not allowed to post too many anti-Biden posts. How many is too many? Why not let the users of the platform upvoted or downvote rather than create an unclear restriction? Of course there is nothing coherent because this is actually just a petty fan of Genocide Joe trying to rationalize why they banned someone for criticizing their politician.

    To be consistent, this mod must now ban themselves for a month lol

  • TheDoctor [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Why now? Presumption of innocence. It may be my own fault, but I do try to think the best of people, and even though they were posting negative articles, they weren’t necessarily WRONG. Biden’s poll numbers, particularly in minority demographics ARE in the shitter.

    he-admit-it michael-laugh

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    337 months ago

    Dude, your house got hit by lightning!

    Eh

    Now it’s on fire!

    What are you gonna do

    The fire is about to spread to your propane tank!

    Jesus, all I ever hear out of you is negativity: ban-hammer

    explosion this-is-fine explosion

    • @goferking0OP
      link
      English
      307 months ago

      They really miss the irony of saying you can’t be critical of Biden while also saying you can’t say anything negative in China that’s illegal there