This is the race most of the country and the world has it’s eyes on right now. It is reguarded as a referedum on Zionazi lobby money in our politics.

atlantic-council Haley “Israel comes to me in my Dreams” Stevens zionist-despair

erb-1erb-2 VS

palestine-heart Dr. Abdul El-Sayed palestine-strong

ringside-reporter Their last debate

Abdul does not identify as a socialist but is very pro Medicare for all and very much Pro Palestine. Calls out AIPAC for spending over $60 Million against him.

  • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t see a thread about Missouri, hope you don’t mind if I hijack this for a moment because I see folks on Reddit baffled about why Cori Bush lost and I’m banned there so getting it out here.

    I feel like there’s a big disconnect between national commentators like Hasan and MikefromPA and locals in St. Louis. Bush - whether it’s fair or unfair - has a major reputation in St. Louis. I guess the best way to say it is… folks in her district see her as a grifter. The faith healing stuff, tornado relief funds, hiring her husband on the campaign, that controversy with her security team when she was in congress. I’ve given up trying to figure how much of it is true, but that doesn’t really matter; people in St. Louis believe it’s true. Even people that like her politics think she’s sus. And Wesley Bell, outside of the Israel/AIPAC stuff, is generally well aligned with voters in MO-1. He’s affable and seen as professional and reliable. American voters and Dem voters in particular are turning on Israel, but I would also caution against assuming it’s Dem voters top priority.

    St. Louis DSA needs to get someone else other than Cori Bush. I don’t think she has any political future in St. Louis.

    But in more positive news, amendments 4 and 5 are getting stomped, like the “no” votes are putting up Assad numbers. Amendment 4 would have eliminated income taxes and replaced them with sales taxes, and 5 would have eliminated the ability for the people to vote on constitutional amendments and pass with a simple majority (which is good in MO, because when it comes down to individual issues MO voters are to the left of Dem politicians)

    Edit: to clarify, not only would amendment 5 stopped voters from being able to amend the constitution, but the GOP-dominated legislature would also get the ability to amend the constitution by a simple majority. So for example, while abortion is currently legal the legislature would have banned it day one had amendment 5 passed.

      • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes she runs a shady faith healing business. I think the left can do better than her.

          • danisth [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 days ago

            I don’t think this is true. She has some beliefs that are out there from where I’m sitting, but I’m guessing they’re pretty common where she is, but the business claim seems to be false. Looks like someone fell for an AIPAC funded campaign set on de-legitimizing Bush. Sure maybe she’s burned now and DSA needs to run someone else, but lets put the blame where it belongs.

            • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              That’s why I said that whether it’s true or not, locals typically believe it’s true, and that affects the vote results. The problem is even if the faith healing part isn’t true or is mostly untrue, there are other factors that either cannot be explained away (like her absentee record in congress or hiring her husband for her campaign) and she has not done a good job of providing answers.

        • danisth [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Any fact checking done on the business? Can’t find anything solid. Looks like she made some claims about healing a women’s tumour, but that’s hardly damning imo.

          • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Looks like she made some claims about healing a women’s tumour, but that’s hardly damning imo.

            If she’s not an actual MD and an Oncologist to me it is

            • danisth [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              I guess I’ve been around enough baptist-style Christians in my life that stuff like this doesn’t phase me. I don’t think she’s correct, but so long as her policy stances are based on evidence-based medicine (which it seems like they are) then I’m not concerned about personal beliefs like this. I’ve seen plenty of faith-healer grifters, Bush doesn’t fit the profile.

          • 389aaa [it/its]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            Given how increasingly terrible public health is, while I would’ve probably voted for her if I lived there I actually find it quite damning. The last thing the government needs is even more alternative medicine cranks, after all.

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    I dislike rooting for a proud proponent of capitalism like El-Sayed, but I do like the prospect of watching his zionist trash opponent get blown the fuck up. I’m very curious how the general will go for him if he wins the primary.

    • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Agree, but i have never heard him punch left, so he has my respect for that (until he does, but i don’t see it happening because he is in the same boat as the DSAers, this are his electoral allies).

  • Antiwork [none/use name, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I don’t have many rules for these candidates and really couldn’t care less if they call themselves Socialists or not. Protect leftists from getting murdered, don’t rip into AES, and stop funding the military/be anti zionist anti imperialist . Outside of that have some progressive agenda and I’m good. They ain’t bringing in the change we want regardless. That’s on us to organize.

  • Hohsia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Misinformation is such a fuck. Apparently Stevens’ team convinced a bunch of POC that Obama endorsed her (he did not). Might be enough to get the Zionazi across the finish line. Fuck

  • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    60 MILLION dollars didn’t work

    60 fucking MILLION dollars from AIPAC.

    This is crazy. In a swing state. In the rust belt. They are fucking PANICKING right now.

        • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 days ago

          “No sectarianism” is pretty dead tbh, but id be in favor of it on this comm at least.

          We are totally aware that bourgeois electoralism is not the revolution, but id like to discuss without having to declare that at the top of every post.

          • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah my synthesis is that

            • electoralism can do small but significant things
            • they’ll probably just get fed up and start blasting us
            • political work is seen by most people as one of only two ways to demonstrate an ability to lead a society. The other is being a capitalist.
            • burning shit down is just going to make relatively comfortable people think you’re crazy and violent
            • there’s value in demonstrating that you already tried the nice way. They did this in Russia for example
            • if America came under the control of even a super half-ass demsoc regime, it would probably (probably) be much less willing to kill leftists in other countries than Democrats or Republicans. This can give a ton of breathing room to people worldwide
            • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’m with you and would add that if they start blasting us (let’s say figuratively for now, ideally not literally), then a lot of people are gonna feel cornered and jump to a revolutionary tendency.

              It’s one of the contradictions of DemSoc thinking (I have multiple frames of mind and this is just one of them), but if the DemSoc movement is successful in its aims does that rule out revolutionary activity? Does an alternative path to building socialism exist that doesnt require a revolution? Idk

              Part of the answer is here though:

              if America came under the control of even a super half-ass demsoc regime, it would probably (probably) be much less willing to kill leftists in other countries than Democrats or Republicans. This can give a ton of breathing room to people worldwide

        • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          yeah it’s getting a bit frustrating that we can’t just apply the no secretarian rule to electoralism and anti electoralism and chill out a bit

          Watching the horse race between pedophile hitler and progressive hitler is not really interesting for people that have checked out altogether.

    • coalition really is divided between factions with lots of genuine support,

      No it’s not , shoving $50 or $60 million dollars into a campaign to defeat a primary candidate is not support. And it’s obvious it’s not support because if Stevens had won there’s no more reason for AIPAC to keep shoving money into her campaign and they wouldn’t have because it’s not in their interest since there’s no difference between her and a Republican on Israel.

      Bluesky liberals are genuinely something else

  • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Michigan is going to be like a Peru redux, 3 weeks to get everything counted out however long it was

    Edit: ignore my other post, I think the fact that only one outlet called it bodes well for this prediction

  • WIIHAPPYFEW [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just tuning in for elections, gotta thank god

    Don’t know why, but tonight seems kinda odd

    No AIPAC funded libs, Thanedar’s gone

    And on Fox News, I already hear squealing hogs

  • Hohsia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Oh god. I looked into this race a bit and I’m afraid to give any input

    Online at least, I noticed a mix of bitter khive-types, moderate democrats and Zionists coming to stevens’ defense and smearing Abdul. Funny because I don’t see anything other than early Obama. Fucking electoralism dude

    I haven’t seen anything even slightly resembling mamdani, but maybe I’m just not looking hard enough. Would happy to be proven wrong