• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 天前

    Gotta be ragebait.

    I sympathise with having “nightmare tenants” who trash the place, but fuck any Landlord who says you can’t work from home because god forbid you use your home that you pay them for because you’d cause a bit more wear and tear than they would like.

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 天前

      fuck any Landlord who says you can’t work from home because god forbid you use your home that you pay them for because you’d cause a bit more wear and tear than they would like.

      Landlordism is in itself unethical. If you’re not using a home it belongs to the person who is making use of it. You shouldn’t have rights to leech wealth from them in perpetuity.

  • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 天前

    I’m a landlord and I don’t care, the house is meant to be used. I’m not using it and your paying me to use it so have at it, it’s my job to save enough of your rent to fix stuff as it fails

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 天前

      Yeah, my tenants have got a dog and we keep the white goods in working order for them. I don’t need them to pay off my mortgage, just want to treat them with the respect I’d want my landlord to treat me with.

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 天前

        Exactly, I got a 3% rate, no hurry in paying off mortgage plus it will probably be my retirement home some day

  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 天前

    They cannot enforce no working from home. God damn those parasites are so fucking out of touch

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 天前

      “Where you work” is not a protected characteristic in the US. Plenty of places where a landlord could throw this clause into the lease, and if they can prove you violated it, they can start eviction proceedings.

      It would be very difficult to prove, and the ensuing legal battle may cost more than the “additional maintenance” that may be required, but in theory these bastards can do pretty much whatever they want.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 天前

        I know, the where you work isn’t protected, but bring a rental has the implicit use of being a domicile, with all the freedoms associated with it

        • tmyakal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 天前

          I guess it depends on what freedoms you associate with being a domicile. Plenty of leases have specific restrictions in the agreement that are enforceable as long as they don’t explicitly conflict with local laws. No smoking, no pets, etc are all valid and enforceable clauses to put in a lease. I’ve signed leases saying “guests can’t stay longer than 24 hours” without batting an eye.

          Requiring a tenant to be out of the house 8 hours per day is odd and difficult to prove, but if you sign a lease that says it, I don’t see how you wouldn’t be accountable to it.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            44
            ·
            5 天前

            Ooh, I actually know a little bit about this!

            A property owner can put whatever TF restrictions they want in the lease—and they often do! But just because it’s in a contract doesn’t mean it’s legal (e.g. contract to kill).

            Let’s say a property owner finds out their tenant is working from home. They claim a violation of the lease and start eviction proceedings. That’s dumb AF.

            • This would only ever be used as an excuse for a tenant they don’t like.
            • If it came before a judge, even they would be like, “WTF?” And would probably not demand an explanation, but instead would point to mountains of case law that say a property owner can’t dictate what people can and can’t do within a rental property as long as those activities don’t impact the property (e.g. the value).
            • That’s when the property owner would have to explain how Joe Schmoe working from home is somehow worse than retiree Judy Anywoman who stays at home all day every day.
            • tmyakal@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 天前

              Oh yeah, as I said, it’s a very difficult thing to prove and absolutely not worth the money wasted trying to enforce it. But there’s no rule saying dogs can’t play basketball. If a landlord wants to put it in, and a tenant knowingly signs it, the tenant needs to be prepared for the possibility of this turning into a huge pain in the ass.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            5 天前

            Where i live, you can say no pets, but that is not enforceable, they can deny you on the application, but you can get a pet the minute you move in and the landlords cant evict you for it

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 天前

            This does depend on where you live. I have had pets in every “no pets” lease I’ve ever had because in my area its unenforceable and not an envictable offence unless under very specific circumstances, usually the landlord would have to be living in the same building and have an allergy to pets to be able to enforce a no pets rule.

            Theres lots of bullshit landlords will put in a lease because they think whatever they write is law but there are often certain standards that apply regardless of what the lease says.

            • tmyakal@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 天前

              Agreed, I said exactly as much:

              enforceable as long as they don’t explicitly conflict with local laws.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      Depending on the jurisdiction.

      No businesses from home is a relatively common condition in a lease and co-op ownership contract, especially if the business involves people constantly visiting the home or turns the mailroom into a warehouse.

      It is the equivalent of a lease banning a person from setting up an Airbnb in the unit they rented.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 天前

          It depends. If you’re an independent contractor working for a company, you could be considered to be operating a business from your home.

          The line has gotten blurry, especially after COVID.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 天前

    Well maybe if the entire property wasn’t done up with the landlord special of tippex on walls and the world’s cheapest laminate floors they’d be able to hold up to the rigours of minor usage.

      • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 天前

        There are no “bad tenants”, because that would imply inconveniencing landlords and costing them money is morally wrong. It’s not, it’s funny as hell😭

        • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 天前

          100% they’re bad tenants. They’re also people who never want to own, they’re people that will never be able to afford to own. There will always be a need for land lords

              • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                4 天前

                Sure, under our current system. But you said there will always be a need for landlords, which I take issue with. But housing doesn’t have to operate the way it does now. There’s a variety of ways to pay for people to have housing under a money-based system, like through taxes. The soviet union had housing cooperatives. Hell, you don’t even need to go that far, housing prices are currently so high because we allow massive real estate corporations to buy up property to artificially inflate price. Government regulation on real estate as an industry would serve to lower housing prices. At the very least, make it so they can’t just sit on vacant homes.

                • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 天前

                  But that’s IF the government would build said housing. Or it takes it away from owners which is fucked. I’m all for government owned housing if they will build it and maintain it. It could lower housing prices and rents, your right if they build enough of them where needed

              • Seb the goblin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 天前

                Only within a relatively recent stretch of history, before that you only needed to pay for fancy stuff (think pyramids or castles or whatnot)

                • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 天前

                  You can say that about a lot of things, matter of fact now, you have to pay for housing, there is no fantasy land where you don’t and won’t in our life time

          • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 天前

            Nah that’s stupid. Why do you presume to know that there will “always” be a need for landlords? People thought there would always be kings until democracy developed, people thought there would always be nobility until capitalism emerged and rendered the land-based social relationships that defined feudal nobility meaningless. You lack imagination.

            • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 天前

              Ok, in our life times we will always need landlords. I know future generations could have a different setup. We can’t product the future. Maybe AI will lead to government built housing and UBI. We don’t know.

                • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 天前

                  I think you don’t realize how slow it will be to get to that point. I am a land lord, what’s the government going to do, take my land and property?

  • schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 天前

    It’s that dog meme which I’m too lazy to even search for because I’m busy working to pay the rent: No Living! Just Rent!

    • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 天前

      I’ve seen some insane restrictions on what you can and can’t do in apartments.

      Like in my apartment I’m only allowed to put an AC in 1 window of my apartment (the furthest from the bedrooms BTW), it can’t be anything other than a portable AC, and any gap around the hose needs to be clear (glass, polycarbonate, acrylic, etc.) yes even the window insert that comes with the AC has to be clear. When I moved in I thought the insert around the hose that came with it not being clear would be fine, it in fact was not. It also has power draw restrictions so I can only basically get the smallest kinds on the market.

      I’m also required to have all windows and doors closed and locked when nobody is at home. Yes that means I have to pull my AC hose out of my window when I’m not home. I figured that out again the first year I lived in my apartment. (they rang my bell when I wasn’t home, then sent me a certified letter informing me I had 72 hours to fix the problem or they would serve me notice to vacate.)

      Yes every summer it easily clears 90F (32C) inside and sometimes even breaks 100F (37C). And due to being an upstairs apartment that means the heat stays almost in it’s entirety overnight.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 天前

        IANAL and I know not everyone can afford one to fight bs like this, but none of that sounds legally enforceable.

        • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 天前

          That’s the big problem really, affording the ability to fight shit like this.

          I’m unfortunately in such a situation where I wouldn’t be able to fight it if they tried to evict me for it.

          Though my home state now makes it so they have to allow us to install one, it doesn’t mention them being unable to put restrictions on it’s install. One of those fun things where it’s better than it used to be it’s still not perfect. But steps in the right direction is always a plus.

    • masinko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 天前

      I have seen certain listings say something like $2400/m, $2600/m if you’re a remote worker.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 天前

    The new customer service protocols seem to be “Gimme your money, here’s your thing, now get out. What? You want the thing to work, too? We got your money, you got your thing, now get the fuck out of here, until you need another one, then come back and see me.”

    This landlord took the guy’s money and gave him a lease, now the guy expects to actually LIVE there, too?

    • P. Montegomery Hat (he)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 天前

      I’m currently going through this with Apple, whom I thought would care more about their reputation and repeat custom. I guess they don’t. Fuck you, Apple. Fix the faulty overpriced shit I paid for.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        Ask anyone around me, and they will tell you that lately, my favorite phrase is to mutter under my breath (and sometime loudly) is “NOTHING WORKS ANY MORE!”

  • SnerkRabbledauber@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 天前

    Come on people. Don’t be so hard on the landlord. If you don’t leave for work, when is he supposed to go through your underwear drawer?

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 天前

    This is why I treat it like a rental. When I was renting my deposit was 10 days of rent and I didn’t expect to get it back because I knew from someone else leaving that the landlord was a wanker.

    I started homebrewing when I lived there, had a batch explode and splatter honey water all across the room. I quickly learnt to avoid the patches of carpet that were sticky. Knowing that the landlord wouldn’t repay the deposit without me taking him to court anyway, I didn’t bother cleaning it up.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 天前

      I’ve been in the same place for over a decade, the deposit I’d like back but the place is kinda infamous for nickle and dime issues to keep as much as possible. Also the new management company have been sticklers for keeping things “clean” without saying what the standard is. I wipe up when I make a mess, sweep and mop when it’s worth my time. Still, they made a stink that I wasn’t perfect. So now I pour oil down the kitchen sink.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 天前

    That’s illegal in my country.

    The only power a landlord has here is when people break stuff on purpose, cause actual disturbance or do not pay. Stuff like race, dogs, job and all that type discrimination is not allowed.

    • Griffus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 天前

      While pet ownership and any sort of discrimination is not allowed in Norway, renters here view in envy at our neighbours regulated renting markets, especially the lowlanders in Denmark. But what hurts the progression here the most right now, is that up to 80 % of adults own their homes, so regulating for the lower 20 % will never be a priority, since that might hurt most people.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 天前

        Prices have been increasing faster than our wages. It’s still kind of manageable but living alone is just a waste of money cause you can’t save much.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 天前

    Lmao I literally spent $2 and 10 minutes replacing an outlet on my rental the other day to avoid having to deal with my landlord