• WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      You ever think about how commerce on the Internet relies on a constant input of vigilance to make sure that information doesn’t propagate? Every class, SaaS product, and video (game) need only be purchased once to be enshrined forever in a web of propagating interconnectivity.

      Information wants to be made available. Special little things are clamouring for entropy. Food wants to find a mouth. It’s only a capitalist that wants to be in the way

  • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    Check the small print? It clearly says product of China. It’s not like those products that say stupid stuff like “Designed in USA” then hide “Made in China” somewhere on the back.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      china perfidiously trying to hide the point of origin by not designing the packaging like this:

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER

      WARNING CCP CHINESE COMMUNIST PRODUCT DANGER[1]


      1. fake grapes ↩︎

  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone hates buying good fruit for cheaper, everyone knows that.

    also in the tweet the dude was crying about chinese imperialism on japan and used the Yuan dynasty as an example lol

  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    The red dragon C, the horse in the Year of the Horse. The “tiny” label on the back twice the size of the front brand. That has a clearly Chinese town and mentions China at least twice.

    99.9999% of Americans don’t know what Muscat grapes are or where they came from. They see big juicy fruit and affordable price.

    Hang on…why is the importer address blanked out? Don’t want to rat out the capitalist importer exploiting Chinese produce? But this was an outrage post! Don’t you want to put the crapitalist competitor on blast?

    powercry-2 No!! Republic of Samsung you too?! It isn’t just the commies?

    https://www.melissas.com/products/shine-muscat-grapes

    What also is this? sore-loser

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shine_Muscat

    NIFTS registered Shine Muscat as a plant variety domestically in Japan in 2006, but its international protection lapsed because the variety was not registered for global protection within the six-year UPOV deadline.

    By 2012, the variety was effectively treated as unprotected outside Japan, allowing growers in countries such as China and South Korea to propagate it legally without paying royalties.

        • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          To sound more sciency/marketing because in plants the more normal term is “line”. Tho strain and line are usually interchangeable.

          In plants where the main propagation method at the production-scale is artificial cloning of highly-heterozigous specific individuals, for example forestry, flowers and cannabis, to describe different germplasms you use “line” or “strain”, instead of “cultivars” which are germplasms propagated via its normal reproduction method while maintaining its genetic qualities like soybeans and wheat.

          Cultivar is also mostly used in species where the breeding is not very high tuned and ultra refined instead of the term “variety”. But both terms have actually legal definitions when talking about vegetal Intelectual Property stuff.

          [Soybeans and wheat are naturally autogamous and in result high/complete homozigous so its normal reproduction is basically cloning but effortlessly.

          In contrast maize is naturally alogamous and have inbreeding depression so you need to put effort to make it highly homozigous to create a genetically stable line which are only useful in breeding/hybrid-lines-production and arent actually used at the harvest-production scale]

          BUTT I’ve never seen people in forestry talk about strains because they use the term “line” instead (a usual term in plants and animals) and in pines and eucaliptus you don’t need sciency jargon for marketing purposes.

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      99.9999% of Americans don’t know what Muscat grapes are or where they came from.

      Muscat grapes are just a variety of grapes that are grown in many places around the world. They are quite sweet which makes them good for eating. They are also used to make Mucat dessert wine and Asti de Moscato.

  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m gonna be real, I actually don’t like Shine Muscat grapes. The flavor is kind of disappointing and the only thing going for them is that you see them and go “wow they’re real big!”

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    these same China Bad posters will laud Henry Wickham with no sense of contradiction, because it’s really about western chauvinism and the racial hierarchy

    It was the greatest act of biopiracy of the 19th century, and maybe in history. In 1876, Henry Wickham emerged from the Amazon jungle with 70,000 stolen rubber seeds. Under absolute secrecy, he tucked the precious cargo in the hold of a steamship and sailed for England.

    https://en.natopedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wickham_(explorer)

  • asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh no! Filthy peasants can access to luxury goods that they don’t deserve and are meant to be only accessible for bougies who has the right to buy them!

  • Feed_el_Castro [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Intellectual property is bullshit in general, but intellectual property of LIVING ORGANISMS is just an entirely other level of fucked up.

    Do the Japanese pay a tax to Kazakhstan for producing apples, which were domesticated in the Kazakh regions? Or kiwis which were domesticated in China? Onions to Mesopotamia? Fuck them

    • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think generally speaking it’s good to have a short period of protection for new innovations, whether it’s a new kind of engine or a new kind of fruit, to encourage research and development with the promise of exclusivity for some period of time. Like, within a Capitalist market system, I don’t think patents are a bad thing

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        sure, within a capitalist market system. but isn’t it clearly better to just directly publicly fund research and development instead of trying to create some sort of jackpot market incentive which duplicates effort and silos information

      • Intellectual property only encourages research and development in profitable sectors. I don’t see why we have to wait and see if markets will research something if deemed profitable enough, when we could democratically decide what research gets funded, and fund it through public institutions. Most research already takes place in public institutions, even in capitalism, only the final step is done by companies which then patent the final step once 99% of the work is done, and profit immensely from it. Also, the researchers themselves don’t even get the IP, it goes to the company they work for.

        It’s so untenable to me.

          • Reminds me of the unbreakable East German glasses that they developed, ultra resistant thin glasses that could be dropped from table height onto a stone floor and wouldn’t break 90% of the time. The inventors were puzzled when they tried to export the glasses and found out that no western distributor wanted to sell glasses which wouldn’t break periodically