• PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yeah they’re turning Americans against data centers by describing them objectively, how insidious…

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Easy to do when people don’t fucking want them, and more specifically, they do not add any value to ppls lives, they only take to away. If only we have reps who represented anything but their own self interests.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They absolutely do this but it doesn’t mean anti datacenter people are wrong. Russia, China, Iran all use amplification techniques to destabilize other countries. You don’t need a complex propaganda plan when you can just amplify every divisive topic and get brexit.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The profound xenophobia of westerners mean they don’t even hesitate to make assertions about “enemy” countries despite the fact they have zero evidence, not even bad evidence, other than their own gut feelings of hostility. What evidence do they have that china “absolutely attempts to turn Americans against Data centers”? None at all, but that doesn’t matter, it’s a negative accusation against a non western nation. What evidence do they have that Iran uses “amplification techniques” to destabilize the West? Well it just feels true, after all, they are coniving foreigners, and surely they must be responsible for the political issues in the West, as the West is too superior to be the source of its own problems.

    • almost_genocide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You don’t need a complex propaganda plan when the U.S. government and corporations conspire daily for new ways to fuck us over. It’s not propaganda at that point.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Why not both? The word propaganda is a bit problematic as it encapsulates too much these days simply because our information landscape is much richer. It can be a valid issue that is amplified by bad actors and it’s still propaganda.

        What makes it apparent imo is the “water use” discussions around data centers which frankly are so delulu that it reeks of artificial stimulation. If you’re not familiar there’s basically no water use issue with data center in any meaningful extent other than moving water and we solved moving water 2 millenia ago.

        • almost_genocide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Because calling it propaganda is also propaganda. It’s just another distraction from the fact that a man with 34 felonies has not been sentenced, nobody from the Epstein files has been prosecuted and both Democratic and Republican politicians are more interested in supporting Israel’s genocide than serving the American people.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Why not both?

          Great standard of evidence there: “even when I have to admit the cause of a problem in the West might not be Foreigners, it could also be foreigners as well!”

  • kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    China didn’t attack Iran and send global oil prices sky high. China doesn’t bully my government into bad defence contracts.

    I’m so tired of racist fear mongering about China. They aren’t a perfect country, but the suggestion of the United States judging any other nation right now is mind boggling.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      China didn’t continually insist Iran was two weeks away from a nuclear weapon for five decades, nor did they bomb and kill the religious leader that expressly declared nuclear and chemical weapons are against God and Islam.

      Believing American narratives at face value is an unhinged reality to live in.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      (China deff has done that second thing btw.)

      Didn’t bomb Iran tho

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        (China deff has done that second thing btw.)

        This a great example of how deeply ingrained racist anti-China fear mongering is in westerners: this person has zero evidence or idea if it’s true, but they’re just going to assert that it “definitely” is, based on nothing but their deep hatred of China.

      • kablez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Australia has no defence contracts with China. Partly because of the “alliance” with the United States.

        • silentaba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          When he says alliance, what he means is how Australia is paying the US to cuckold it about 2nd hand submarines it will never get, while also paying the US to gaslight Australia that they will get them as long as they continue letting the US cuckold Australia until that makes them respect them enough to then sell the 2nd hand submarines.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol. It’s obviously a consortium of trans, immigrants and antifa that are behind it. While Michelle Obama and Soros are funding the operation.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    OpenAI is doing a much better job than China at getting people to hate AI.

  • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Im not against data centers, that’s mostly where the internet runs from. Im against AI data centers though

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      A bunch of the anti-data center propaganda on social media doesn’t make this distinction and it makes it sound like they don’t know what tf they’re talking about, especially given that they’re posting it on a platform powered by data centers and pretty much every internet-based service they use goes through a data center. Even well known leftist accounts are doing this, and they need to get better about clarifying their message because the way they’re promoting it right now makes everyone associated with them look stupid

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I worry this may be a real problem though because there is not any real distinction in the messaging.

      I work in a small data center. Its a 50x100 ft or so room with a few dozen racks of servers in a non descript old telco building. Not a giant water and energy sucking monster.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The rage against Data Centers must be because of filthy foreigners, it couldn’t possibly be because of how the 100% American billionaries and their bought and paid for 100% American politicians are imposing on everybody by hook and by crook something which for everybody but said billionaires is a net bad thing (since for everybody but those capturing the profits of Data Centers, the nasty side effects of them vastly exceed the minuscule benefits from them which are nothing more than a handful of new jobs per Data Center).

    “Always blame foreigners” is a core practice American political discourse, quite independly of which side of the Power Duopoly one is aligned with, probably because it perfectly dovetails with the American Exceptionalism the locals are indictrinated in their whole lives.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because there is no Chinese campaign against data centers. China was simply pointing out the environmental and economic impacts data centers have on the areas around them.

    Who is saying data centers are okay? They are not. And I do not even have any issue with LLM usage, yet I still recognize that data centers are incredibly resource-intensive and can have significant impacts on the communities that host them.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think the predominant logic in the thread is that China trying to influence Americans against datacenters can’t be true because that could be an attempt to make a pro-datacenter argument, even though it’s not.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the logic is more noting that the pro-datacenter argument aligns with linking opposition to them to foreign actors.

        Anti-China sentiment is extremely powerful to tap into, and the AI crowd absolutely is pulling out every stop to keep the bubble unpopped. Tapping into that energy for public opinion is the least surprising approach they could be taking.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I understand that it’s easy to believe someone could make this up to undermine anti-AI arguments. I don’t understand why it’s less easy to believe China would use social media to further their own goals - like everybody does. I mean, sometimes reality aligns with what somebody on the wrong team says.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh, the reason for that is the claimant here is OpenAI. That’s why there’s this credibility hurdle in people’s reactions.

            • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Kevin O’Leary (Shark Tank) makes the same claim. He isn’t connected with OpenAI but is behind building a Utah datacenter, so he has no credibility either. The problem is, even if China really is doing this, nobody in the anti-AI community will believe it unless somebody points it out who is part of the community - just like with most other major issues. The Information Age has turned out to be a cluster of impenetrable echo chambers.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                It’s crazy that the idea that you should actually present evidence to support the accusation against China doesn’t even occur to you.

  • domusaltera@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any of you read the article that OpenAI wrote? Here’s a quote: “The operation sought to exploit and amplify existing public concerns about energy prices and local impacts of data center development, but we found no evidence of meaningful breakout beyond its own activity .” So it’s less “China is making you hate data centers” and more “they tried but it didn’t work”.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      More like “We tried to blame it on China but couldn’t find evidence to back up our accusations”

      • jack_of_sandwich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But we put the accusation in the title anyway, confident that no one will read anything else.

    • jack_of_sandwich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It turned out people didn’t need China to find reasons to hate our data centers.

    • gtrcoi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is valuable because it shows that China believes this is a wedge issue they can use. Doesn’t really matter to me if it works or not tbh, just that it aligns with their interests is concerning. It would be really interesting if we had info about what other topics China or Russia are investing time into and how they align with domestic political clusters.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Just brainlessly taking openAi at their word. And then just randomly adding Russia in their, out of the blue, because to the fascist westerner “Russia and China” is just a single undifferentiated horde of evil foreigners.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    More BS pre-IPO marketing PR, look our tech is so dangerous and scary China is trying to shut it down.

    Even though China is basically in the lead with open weight models that use less energy to run (MoE) and cost (probably way) less than a tenth as much to train for around 90%+ the effectiveness of frontier models.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    the red luddite spectre very spooky oOOoooOo

    they want to take your freedom slop

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re taking away our freedom medislop to sell their own Pooh slop

      Tap for spoiler

      i’m neither from the usa or china. i hate their governments