If you are a human, human ethics of not killing “alive” stuff still applies to you no?
Thinking more into rules of ethics, if those simulated beings came up with their own morals like “don’t try calculating all digits of pi in large groups because it causes lag” that would not really apply to you.
Basically different beings have different rules of ethics IMO and you can’t simply end the simulation more so because you are a human than anything.
The answer could change in same exact scenario if you are some kind of eldritch being instead of human.
Did you just watch “Plaything” on Black Mirror?
I was thinking the microverse battery from Rick and Morty!
If this is a way for our simulation creator to decide to pull the plug without guilt, I guess just go ahead and do it. I was holding out hope that this was all real, but it has been getting more clear that it’s not.
Couldn’t they just make us all infertile and let us die naturally or something?
Just turn down the simulation speed real low and run it at one tick per 20 years, then you can technically keep it going without such great expense. The people inside won’t notice the difference.
If you take the limit of that you’ll realize that people won’t raise if you turn it off either.
“Now playing human music, on Earth Radio”
Hahahaha. Eat apple!
This is a tough question, I think to answer it you have to know if those simulated beings have actual consciousness / sapience or if that is just simulated.
The old question right? Does a simulated (or rather emulated) brain actually think and feel? Or does the computer just output what it would be if it was alive?
I think before I am, but I can’t prove that I’m self aware and not just “pretending” to do so. But because you are a human being like me, I understand that you do too. But that assumption is broken when you are not a physical organism but software running on a computer.
I mean, I get that a software on a computer is something.else. But why is the asumption broken?
No.
I’d say that whether or not it’s in a simulation doesn’t matter. If the beings you created were recognizable as people (human or otherwise) then they have rights and you’d be trampling those rights if you ended their existence. The creation of such life should not be done without an appropriate sense of responsibility.
then they have rights
Why? I’m not trolling, I just really think it’s interesting where people think “rights” come from. Some people think they come from God. Which is great, because in this scenario we are God. So anything we do is ethical because we did it.
I contend they come from States. Because I notice that rights are different in different States. And I don’t think a god would obey jurisdiction.
Another way of saying this is that the beings themselves have to recognize and demand rights. Because a state is just people deciding things after all.
So where do the rights come from? Are they a legal/socail construct, or inherent in the universe some how? Some third thing I didn’t think of?
People forget how scary the real world is. We are the only creatures to create this concept of rights. You think that grizzly bear cares about your rights? Got some news for you…
And shit, even we don’t respect other people’s right to exist.
:: gestures very very briefly to… EVERYTHING going on right now::
You think the asteroid that ended 90+% of life on earth cared about the dinosaurs’ rights?
All that being said, I wouldn’t be able to pull the plug.
I wouldn’t want to shut down the simulation, but it would depend on the energy expenditure. A hospital could theoretically save more people if they allocated fifty million dollars per patient. A person’s right to life is contingent on the cost to maintain it.
I am of the opinion that rights come from understanding, that recognizing and respecting them is a hallmark of advancing human understanding. States/religions/whatever that lack rights are either less advanced in understanding or motivated to avoid recognizing/respecting them.
Depends who they’ve elected as leader.
Intelligence isn’t the important factor there - consciousness is. Does it feel like something to be those entities in the simulation? If yes, then I’d argue that ending the simulation is like killing a person painlessly in their sleep.
I personally don’t think ending the simulation is even the most troubling part. We could unintentionally create a simulation that’s effectively a hell and then populate it with entities that have subjective experiences we don’t realize exist. The only thing worse than ending a life is creating one just for it to suffer through its entire existence.
Didn’t scientists train brain cells to exclusively play Doom? It’s like their whole conscience is stuck in a video game version of hell through a brain in a vat experience.
Not really. It’s not nearly enough cells to have any kind of consciousness as we know it. A few neurons learning to play a game is a far cry from tying a being into a simulation of hell.
I dunno. Some life forms have only a few brain cells. It could mean their whole world for those little cells, wouldn’t it?
exclusively play Doom?
How dare they take away their right to variety! /s
We could unintentionally create a simulation that’s effectively a hell and then populate it with entities that have subjective experiences we don’t realize exist. The only thing worse than ending a life is creating one just for it to suffer through its entire existence.
And this is basically the plot of the TV series Severance. Has me wondering how they intend to address it.
The only thing worse than ending a life is creating one just for it to suffer through its entire existence.
Antinatalism entered the chat
Or maybe just well reasoned morality?
We can probably simulate a snail but me killing that wouldn’t make my wife scream at me for killing a snail.
Depends on the AWS spend.
Anything above 0 is already entering unethical territory, so…
Somewhere in a box in your childhood home, a Tamagotchi is slowly dying…
Slowly? Those things would ‘die’ in under 24 hours!
What the fuck is a Tamagotchi
the simulacrants wouldn’t realize the simulation is ever not running.
Kurzgesagt made a video about how in a dying universe (from heat death) civilizations that uploaded their consciousness into a simulation could live forever, by intermittently running the simulation and pausing it for greater and greater amounts of time as expendable energy in the universe diminishes. The consciousness would not perceive the time the simulation isn’t running and to them things just go on and on for eternity.
Now imagine an eternal being sitting in a cold planet and seeing the starts fade one by one, until there is nothing to see… And then be there, conscious forever. Alone. In the dark.
What I find interesting is how we abstract away the actual work needed to keep either scenario running reflects how billionaires justify their own extremes. The heat death being a most extreme example as there is no “spare” energy for other organism to be conscious. The uploaded consciousness is detached from reality, living in a dieing universe, and still insists it has a right to exist at the cost of new venues of consciousness.
Play Expedition 33 and let us know what you picked and why.
or SOMA
Oh is that what it’s about. I thought it was the horror game or something. The advertising for it was so ambiguous I never really looked into it
I’m only half way through, and don’t you dare hit that spoiler!
This game is beyond quips. It’s beautiful, with great music, and an absolutely bat shit story that you have to experience for yourself. The introductory 15 minutes drug some moisture from my eye holes.
And nothing against jrpgs, I have big final fantasy nostalgia, but the French insanity felt like a breath of fresh air.
It’s hard to describe what it’s about without spoiling it, because the mystery of that universe is part of what draws you in. In a way, the comment you replied to is a major spoiler since you don’t
spoiler
find out you’re in a “simulation” until near the end of the game.
But it’s an incredible game that I recommend to any JRPG fan.
