It’s on Twitter. The fact you don’t want to see it on Twitter doesn’t create a requirement for me to provide it for you elsewhere. You’re the one claiming this whole thing is a fake news media hoax smear campaign destined to make Tesla look bad (as if we need a hoax smear campaign to do that when they’re constantly killing, burning, and downing their occupants).
Good job responding to my arguments. I guess you were too busy gargling muskrat ballsack to put together a thought more complex than “I’m not a musky fanboy, you’re the Rober and fake news media fanboy”
Edit: Good job trying to remove the “like you” after I called you out on it then attacking me for insulting you by pretending you took the high ground in the first place… You musk fanboys are all the same… All bluff and bluster…
Just because someone doesn’t suck random idiots on youtube’s cocks like you, doesn’t mean they blow Musk.
And you Musk fanboys are the only ones to have cracked the case that got by everyone else and every reporting journalist. Mark Rober and the Fake News Media trying to attack your best boy genius and self made trillionaire musky boy. Wow! A real Inspecteur Clouseau the lot of you!
Edit: I’ll bite even though you’re arguing in bad faith. After the so called missing blue light hoax Rober posted the whole unedited crash video “Rober responded by posting the raw footage from the crash to dispel rumors, writing in a post on X that he’s unsure “why it disengages 17 frames before hitting the wall but my feet weren’t touching the brake or gas.”” Then you Musk fanboys decided that there must have been another more fake video for other made up reasons.
In the end, if this video is fake, it should have been a slam dunk lawsuit from famously litigious Musk and Tesla. They would have been able to subpoena the “real” footage and sue Rober for defamation with actual harms in lost sales. Should be easy to show lost sales for Tesla, they’ve been losing sales since musky boy went full Heil Hitler. What’s that? None of this happened? Tesla’s genius autopilot by genius inventor Elon Musk is only as smart as Wyle E Coyote? Why don’t you go ahead QQ more about it!
There is no such thing as a selfless good deed. We’re social animals. We feel GOOD when people around us feel GOOD. We’re intelligent animals. We notice this pattern and conclude that if we make another person feel good, WE’LL feel good too. This is virtuous.
Sharing good deeds make them feel NORMAL and people like to follow the standards for normal behaviour to fit in. This creates a virtuous circle.
Sure some people only do a good deed to advertise it because they’ll get more capital out of it than the cost of the deed. But that’s not what’s happening here. I don’t know the store or the owner, they get nothing from me.
LMAO “autopilot disengaged itself just before the crash so it doesn’t count”
Every Tesla will do this LOL
https://futurism.com/someone-else-tested-tesla-crash-wall-painted-road
I like the meta layer of it. For the girl in the show they’re identical concepts because she IS a drawn child.
Otherwise all your points are valid though they leave a bad taste in my mouth. In Canada drawn CP is basically treated the same as actual CP by the courts which feels a bit extreme.
For the purposes of child pornography laws, a “person” includes both actual and imaginary human beings including drawings from the imagination, cartoons, or computer-generated composites
The definition of child pornography includes any person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years.
https://talkingforchange.ca/understanding-child-pornography-laws-in-canada-what-you-need-to-know/
It also has minimum sentences of 1 year for a “felony count” and 6 months otherwise
(4) Every person who possesses any child sexual abuse and exploitation material is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-163.1.html
I’ve never really considered how arbitrary this law feels until you put together that message. Record live actual CSAM is the same as downloading a sketchy anime apparently.
“I used to have a big crush on you” totally legit, playful, good way to see if she was ever into you.
“I used to love you” that’s weird. If you’re still friends don’t you still love her at least platonicly? The explanations you’ve been giving in this thread can only make the situation more strange and more awkward. Love means a lot of things to a lot of people so it’s a weird word to use in the past tense about a friend you used to also be attracted to.
Where the hell do you live, this picture and view are amazing!
My perennial fear is that Lemmy.ca becomes a right wing shithole like /r/canada was.
I like to think this joke is about what the neighbour claims your dog damaged when you tell him you’ll make things right and pay for damages.
That insurance cost is CRAZY. That’s 1% of the cost of your bike every month. I.e. you’ll have paid your bike in insurance premium in 8 years. This policy is only valuable if you expect your bike to need “total replacement” which I assume means it’s stolen, more than every 8 years?!
Just put that money in an account and you can buy a new bike every 8 years for “free” as your insurance policy.
I know this was just a shitpost… But it’s got a philosophical dimension. With the mothman, it’s very clear that he has lamp needs that aren’t satisfied by his human partner. Here we are not offended by his lamp desires, we’re surprised that his human partner is shocked by his behaviour when it’s otherwise fairly intuitive and predictable.
Yet when we restore the original, we are unable to empathise with a human who may have important unmet needs. And we can rightfully say of his partner that they should expect him to be loyal. But these monogamous expectations are cultural and they clearly aren’t flexible enough to encompass all of the wonderful tapestry of platonic, romantic, and intimate relationships and expressions. Therefore we continue to be beholden to cultural expectations that create unmet needs and expectations which may be incompatible with a sustainable relationship with many individuals.
You didn’t describe shit. You just said “what about China” like a Fox news anchor whenever any thing good is about to happen to Americans
Not without a second impulse at the minimum. There are no stabilising forces like friction or drag in space.
Nobody said “what about Europe” like an idiot either. They made a relevant point that contributed meaningfully to the conversation.
People like you make me feel like the tankie conspiracies are right.
Nobody said anything about China… STFU
This is why cell (and broadband) should be regulated as a utility, not a luxury.
The big three trying to have their cake and eat it as usual!
That’s not even ROI… because the oil would have been transported using rail or another more expressive transport. So the pipeline only returns the savings from rail transport plus the net profit of the additional oil that couldn’t be transported. That would only be a fraction of the net revenue.
Then you have to consider that the government gets its returns only on tax, which is only on gross profit… So it’s another fraction of that number again.
That’s how the Clintons spiced up their marriage after killing Serbians stopped working