Apparently the US Department of DefenseWar thinks that they can order non-US citizens not resident in the USA to cease and desist from mailing things.

Uh…

Hilarity of the items involved aside, the gall of the US military postal service to give orders to civilians not under their command and not even of their nation is shocking.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    If I recall correctly this was more an amusing story of troops stationed in a country where these items were illegal ordering these things to the base and the military trying to remind people to respect local laws. This is probably more about the military not wanting a diplomatic incident with the host country than them morality policing themselves. Reminding a business to not ship items to a country where those items are illegal seems a pretty reasonable thing. For now the US military doesn’t care if you order butt plugs to the base, they care if you bring butt plugs into a country where they are illegal.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah because the US is really big on respecting local laws and not causing international incidents. I’m sure a quick perusal of current and historical headlines will reaffirm this stands.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Apparently the US Department of DefenseWar

    You had it right the first time.

    Congress hasn’t made the name change official.

    It’s not legally changed just because Trump waved his magic wand sharpie and wished it to change.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        In some ways it’s a bit of a shame that he lacks self-awareness. If he knew what he was doing he could have renamed the press department to be the Department Of Truth and gone all in on the Draconian.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is squarely on the military personnel ordering buttplugs to their work address.

    If you did that anywhere else you’d get in trouble.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m self-employed, so the address isn’t the problem, but I’d have some splainin to do to the wife.

      “I KNOW you didn’t order that for ME, so you got something to tell me?”

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Why would I get in trouble for shipping myself something to my work address?

      Lots of cities have porch pirates, so shipping to work is done commonly.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      High chance it was a “friend” ordering it for them.

    • warbond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      1 day ago

      They practically only have a work address when they’re overseas. In some cases it’s literally the only way to get things sent to you. Why anyone knows or cares is another question entirely.

      • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I read a previous article about this: importing any sex toys (including butt plugs, but they get the headline because the Republicans in power being squeamish about the existence of gay soldiers) are illegal in the country where they are stationed, so they’re getting seized by customs and it’s awkward since their soldiers are violating local laws.

      • PhoenixDog@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because as a queer bisexual man, I can assure you republicans care more about the genitals of other people than we do.

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah so it’s not just the department of war it’s also Bahrain’s backwards laws, and the US is obligated to do this any time shit gets sent back I guess.

    It’s really silly since she even says they have no idea where it’s going when they ship to soliders.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      They really shouldn’t have made such a big deal out of it because now it’s going to definitely happen more often.

  • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In some fairness it sounds like the Kingdom of Bahrain are the weird ones here. But still, it sounds like all other arguments aside, she has no way of knowing if a soldier is any particular place. So asking her to stop sending to soldiers in that region is kind of pointless.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s pretty standard for American commenters on social media to unthinkingly assume that American law is somehow “universal.” I guess that’s the level that the American government in general has descended to at this point.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, you see stories of Americans in foreign countries being detained or arrested and they are like “I know my rights” LOL. Clearly you don’t.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You also see Canadians citing their First Amendment right to free speech, which is always amusing.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          It’s like one of my idiot friends who keeps going on about “the feds”. The feds in question apparently operate in North Yorkshire. Personally I’m sceptical.

        • charles@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I know this isn’t what they’re doing at all, but I like to think they’re actually referring to the first amendment of our constitution. I find it comical to think they’re that passionate about either the establishment of Manitoba (technically the first amendment) or strengthening Indigenous peoples’ rights (first amendment after 1982 when we achieved full sovereignty).