Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.

Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.

  • 0 Posts
  • 3.34K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 3rd, 2024

help-circle





  • When automated detection fails then it’s up to people to manually report it and mods / admins to manually apply the label.

    Which is not reliable, and which therefore leads to the witch-hunting problem.

    Whether an image actually is AI and whether some random person thinks it “looks” AI are not always in alignment. Especially considering that “is AI” has shades of grey too, given that lots of images are made using AI tools for only some aspects. And even “AI tool” is open to interpretation.

    I was talking about screening and reporting posts and you’ve moved to profile pics for some reason?

    It was just an example of an AI-generated image that I could point to that I’m quite sure doesn’t have any special metadata attached to it. If for no other reason than I generated it years ago.


  • Some AI providers add that metadata, yes. It’s what piefed searches for with its automatic filters. But metadata can be stripped, or not added at all in the first place.

    My avatar image is AI-generated, for example. I did it using local AI models, edited it with image editing tools, converted formats, and so forth. I doubt it’s got anything the automated filters would recognize on it. If I didn’t tell you its pedigree would you know to report it? What if it actually isn’t AI generated after all, how can your report be tested for accuracy? That’s the sort of problem that OP is calling out here.