More like resouce deez nuts

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    Even the department name “Human Resources” is part of the liberal dehumanization process. Notice how the more techbros call things “human” the more dehumanizing and inhumane their actual perspective and intent is? It’s not new, and it’s at least as old as “Human Resources.”

    • Infamousblt [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      That’s why you’re seeing more and more departments calling themselves the “people team”. Like changing your name makes you less of a ghoul

      • macabrett [comrade/them, any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        It felt even more gross when my workplace did this for about five years tbh. They changed it back to Human Resources recently lol

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        Yeah, it’s still gross, but in some ways, when some techbro talks about enhancing the human connection so humans can better communicate with their fellow humans so humans can be better humans in a more human community, it’s a helpful tell just how alien that shit sounds after while.

      • @sping
        link
        English
        171 year ago

        They used to be “Personnel”.

        • charlie [any, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Side effect of business structure being taken from military structure. Still called Personnel in the military, and even Human Resources has been getting rebranded lately. Same shit though

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        I didn’t say otherwise. I said it’s part of the liberal dehumanization process. Techbros are only the most recent wave of that process.

        • @CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          The company I work for is wise to the connotation of “human resources” and opted to call the department “people experience”. Now that’s techbro.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 year ago

            That’s still creepy and fucked up, but it’d feel like salt in a wound if they still had some bullshit up about “connecting humans to humans to make all humans into better humans” or the like.

        • GaveUp [love/loves]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          The last 2 big tech companies I worked have renamed HR to “people Ops (Operations)” now for the cleaner image despite having the exact same role profile

          Now that’s tech bro

      • @sping
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        In my world it came in during the 90s, concurrent with early tech expansion. Before that it was called Personnel.

  • GriffithDidNothingWrong [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    HR people are incredibly useful. They’re the first line of defense in protecting the company from litigation. Their worth to you is entirely dependent on whether or not you own a company

  • cosecantphi [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How do HR people have friends or any sort of personal relationship whatsoever outside of family?

    If I found out a friend of mine was working as a fucking HR person, I’d probably never talk to them again. I can’t imagine there aren’t literally millions upon millions of other working class people who feel the same way. They aren’t as bad as landlords, but wow are they up there.

    • GaveUp [love/loves]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Okay maybe it’s cause I’m a liberal but have you talked to HR people irl? They’re not any worse than other libs outside their job and are pretty normal (relative to other libs)

      • cosecantphi [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Well, it really has nothing to do with how nice they are outside of work. I’d be disgusted to associate with anyone who has made a career out of treating working people like livestock.

  • Maoo [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    HR is worse than worthless. They’re just a way to further divy up blame and surveillance roles previously taken on by the owner class in exchange for careerism (same reason management exists). Have a problem? Don’t organize with your coworkers, go to HR, they’ll “fix” it (do exactly what the owner wants using the info you provide). Bad news about those raises we promised? HR will deliver it with faux-sympathy.

  • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    They’re very useful to the company. They are not on your side though as a worker. They are effectively the prosecution, state’s attorneys and you are the one on trial. Talking to HR is like talking to cops, it can only hurt you but cannot help you. If your workplace is unionized, demand a steward be present at any disciplinary meeting. That’s your defense lawyer, and they won’t be present unless you exercise your rights.

    • Wordplay [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Always bring a steward.

      HR’s first impulse when receiving a serious sexual harassment complaint from my coworker was to reframe everything my coworker said in the most downplayed way. Like a, “oh shit this is serious. . . how do I get this employee to make it sound like it wasn’t a big deal”. Inhuman Resources indeed.

    • GaveUp [love/loves]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      No, they’re more like cops in the sense they protect the capital and interests of the company against its subjects

      • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Yep, they’re agents of capital.

        This is why the “1%” rhetoric from Berniecrats and soc dems is a bit misleading. It’s not just 1% of the population heavily invested in protecting capital and perpetuating the capitalist system, it’s closer to something like 30-40% when you include all the petty bourgies (small business owners, landlords), the agents of capital (cops, feds, organized crime, military, upper management, media class) & brainwashed class traitors (militias, lumpen, reactionary proles).

        If there ever is a communist revolution in the US, there’s going to be WAY more reactionaries and counter-revolutionaries than 1% of the population (which is still 3.5 million people by the way). Anyone who doesn’t think we’ll need gulags is kidding themselves.

        • GaveUp [love/loves]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I would include the bourgeois proletariat (description of many of the English working class around the 20-30s by Lenin) as well; The ones that are of genuine worker class but because they make so much money, they stand to gain from imperialism as they have the wealth to heavily take advantage of the currency and dirt cheap raw resources and labor

  • MerryChristmas [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    We used to have an HR department until the one lady who was the department retired. She mostly just reset people’s passwords for them. Now that we don’t have an HR department, they just give us admin rights on our machines so we can reset our own passwords. Automation is coming for us all.

      • D61 [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        If their employer has outsourced most of the traditional HR stuff… then yeah. They were just holding on to an employee in a position about to get cut, until they retired.

      • MerryChristmas [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There has never been an IT department but I guess at one point she was young and computer literate.

      • MerryChristmas [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It has happened. We got a mandatory training course afterward with some multiple choice quiz, so I think we are safe now.