I was looking for images online to create an agitprop meme till I somehow stumbled upon this depravity.
“apolitical” Libs really think that they can put up a “NOT POLITICAL” force-field and expect “apolitical” responses in “apolitical” discussions. Then they proceed to espouse the very racist, eugenicist, et. tal. ideas that they claim to be against this whole time.
Best-of Reddit replies:

Saudigate LOL (and “what are we, a bunch of asians” and all the usual racist shit Reddit casually allows in their decrepit site)…

ok fash


This is obviously deeply unserious, as usual. It’s pretty easy to “prove” that there are “more immigrants than natives” by just taking a random screenshot of brown people walking down the street. The city at 1st place with the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe is Brussels, sitting at ~35%, then Frankfurt at 2nd place at 29%, if we’re to believe Eurostat. It shouldn’t be hard understand then, that you will see more white people in those cities even after the so-called mass immigration.


It is not, as far as reality is concerned. The “UN Program” mentioned, from what I can see from just the title and preface alone, discusses whether immigrants can mitigate Global North declining populations… History, to these libs, of course started in 2015 when Moroccans, Lybians, Syrians and Iraqis just totally-out-of-nowhere decided it would be radicool to immigrate to Europe and asked Big Europe to teleport them all to Europe, then afterwards proceeded with spreading their ebil gommunist Sharia ideals of replacing the hapless white people who didn’t see it coming.


Settlers, colonialists invading and occupying various Indigenous lands:👍
Immigrants escaping wars, famines and economic downturns as a result of rent-seeking debt traps, etc… all engineered by the imperial West: “Mein Fuhrer, we should enact population control to address the concerns over the fall of the Aryan race!”
damn… I spent more time on this post than what I originally ventured out to do :/…
OOP’s argument in a nutshell.

I’m pretty sure /r/TrueUnpopularOpinion is a straight up fascist subreddit
Trueanything is probably fash
r/TrueAnon

/r/anything is probably fash
Go to r/TrueUnpopularOpinion
look inside
the most popular opinions you will ever read
Great replacement isn’t popular among even a plurality of people. Extremely popular opinions (that aren’t progressive) are way more common on the original UnpopularOpinion.
Great replacement isn’t popular among even a plurality of people.
True enough. It’s only really popular amongst most conservatives who spend too much time online
unpopularopinion was already pretty fascist but I guess it wasn’t fascist enough for them
unpopularopinion was half fash, half popular opinions. trueunpopularopinions just removed all of the popular opinions.
I wouldn’t know for sure, I don’t usually go near Basically 4Chan With An Orange Coat Of Paint unless if I accidentally find something that’s eyebrow-raising or if it’s against my will.
i’m not a nazi

And again to be clear, I’m not trying to make a POLITICAL point here. I’m not claiming to know WHY this is happening or WHO is orchestrating it,
I know fash overestimate how clever they are but geez, way to blow your cover.
Me, whenever I go to make a normal apolitical comment:
Well for starters I am not a Nazi, but
can white people just get replaced already to save us all this trouble
Please never stop failing to live up to your username 🙏
Just asking questions!!! Just noticing!!!
If we choose to entertain the dipshittery of white nationalists seriously, the only reasonable conclusion is that white replacement theory is real and inevitable and the reason why is most white nationalists subscribe to one-drop rule on some level, even among Europeans. If having one (1) POC ancestor disqualifies someone from being really whiteTM, then it stands to reason that the number of white nationalist-certified whiteTM people whose entire ancestry can be traced to Europe and only Europe will be an ever shrinking pool of people. At a certain point, the only real whiteTM people are Europeans living in some village in the Alps whose entire (inbred) ancestors live in that same village for centuries. Every other European will have some non-European ancestor somewhere in their family tree.
Every other European will have some non-European ancestor somewhere in their family tree.
This is already the case for basically everyone in Spain and Portugal within the last thousand years, and everyone else if you go a bit further back
And also I’m failing to see the problem. Who gives a shit where your ancestors came from or where they were born? If they got something you like about them and vice versa then a happy couple (or polycule) is made. Any offspring that result will likely also have whatever positive traits made the first couple/polycule successful in the first place.
Any offspring that result will likely also have whatever positive traits made the first couple/polycule successful in the first place.
The thing about human evolution in particular is that this doesn’t really work - there is a level of variability at the population level that means you can’t really do trait selection like this for
For a real life example, schizophrenia is a highly heritable condition. Europe in the 20 the century and Nazi Germany to the greatest extent sterilised or murdered almost everyone diagnosed with schizophrenia, but rates returned to normal within a couple of generations
But yes you’re entirely right, definitionally everyone alive is a descendent of a thousand generations of bipedal survivors
However to be sufficiently (((racist))) you have to sort of ignore the common origins of all life
there is a level of variability at the population level that means you can’t really do trait selection like this for
Fair, though I’m admittedly grossly oversimplifying things to make the point of the uselessness of selecting for ancestral geographic descent.
But yes you’re entirely right, definitionally everyone alive is a descendent of a thousand generations of bipedal survivors
And in that regard we’re all ancestrally geographically African ^^ Always valuable to remind idiot racists of this
being 
It’s just statistics
please don’t beat me upLet’s assume they’re not
here, just a moron. The best way to drop birth rates is to improve the standard of living. People have as many children as they need, and if the state makes them literate and makes birth control available and has robust senior care, job done, 1.5 children per couple. Liquidate all the F35s to pay for the NHSThe best way to drop birth rates is to improve the standard of living.
If standard of living in Western countries halved tomorrow, birth rates would collapse, not improve.
these freaks never realize that the reason they can’t normalize this bullshit because it relies on an idea of racial purity and this is pretty much at odds with not being a racist. If you buy into racial purity than great replacement theory is equally valid for everybody, like the monarchies but on a larger scale
Our ‘native’ population has an average birth rate of 1.44 children per couple.
Okay but have you considered that anglos are hideous?
Isn’t one of the big points of the conspiracy theory that originally had the name “great replacement theory” that the Jews were explicitly the ones behind the mass migration and the replacement of white people?
Because it sounds like they’ve found proof of “replacement” (but not really), but not proof of “great replacement”.
That’s the beauty of question begging, because they still tacitly insert at the end that it is being “orchestrated,” and it’s not like you’re going to find many other answers to that question* because Nazi types are the only ones proffering this shit to begin with.
*the question “who is orchestrating this?” once the false assumption is already made that it’s being orchestrated
Now they say it’s Soros and his minions orchestrating it (ignore that he’s Jewish because apparently he enjoyed the Holocaust, which is based on an out of context quote to begin with).















