Discord defends itself against efforts to stop piracy on its platform by saying no to more invasive data collection. Even though Discord isn’t exactly known for privacy, this is a great move for its users. What are your thoughts?

  • @swankypantsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 hours ago

    I know the feeling. Similar thing happened in a discord I’m in. Rate limit ban on a leader account, no response from support even via burner, then jumped ship to a new one that could actually be managed.

    At least discord has to foot the storage costs of a dead server pestered with bots because of their own incompetence.

  • @Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 hours ago

    I had a server with a respectable size.
    Did a hard cutoff due to some stupid discord thing.
    I managed to get a total of 50 people of about 3k to switch and out of those like 7 actually stayed.

    Yet I had to get a burner account again to get in touch with certain people.

    Its all be man.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      1918 hours ago

      How else would they store and sync the information?

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 hours ago

        Sync from another online user. If each message is signed by the author, there’s a built-in protection against tampering.

        It’s really not hard, they just have to care enough to build it that way.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          12 hours ago

          Can’t feds also sync them from other users?

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 hours ago

            Sure, if they’re granted access to the channel. But that access would come from users of the channel, not the service itself, and if the service doesn’t store the keys (i.e. you need at least one user online to get access), the service can’t really help the feds.

            And whether to provide access to history for new users can absolutely be a setting on the channel. I’m just saying that having the messages only on the clients doesn’t preclude sharing those messages with a newcomer.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          1717 hours ago

          They do have to retrieve old messages when new users join though. I’m sure the government can force them to lett them in a server and unlock the roles

          • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 hours ago

            Keep the data but encrypted. Let users send links that contain the pki info to decrypt the messages. Have that pki info generated client side.

            Discord would only need to shuffle data, provide authentication, and provide the web app data down to the client. But every bit of user shared and generated content would be encrypted to them.

            • Aatube
              link
              fedilink
              22 hours ago

              Like I said, Discord can still be compelled to let feds join the server, thus receiving the PKIs.

          • @stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            414 hours ago

            Why?

            Why is channel history needed for new users?

            Back in the IRC days you joined a channel that was just empty, if you wanted the history you had to run an IRC client continously, I remember running screen irssi on a separate computer and sshing into the server, reconnecting the screen with irssi in it.

            If you want the history automatically, you can’t expect privacy.

            • @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 hours ago

              At the same time, expecting privacy in a room where a bunch of strangers hang out is already unreasonable. If everyone already in the channel can log the chats, for example by idling in the channel, then adding E2E on top of that is probably a false sense of security.

            • @rooster_butt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 hours ago

              I have an issue with something I’m using and there is a discord server I will join it. I then search my issue and its usually been adressed in the past. Without history I would be forced to ask the question that has probably been answered many times in the past.

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 hours ago

              If you want the history automatically, you can’t expect privacy.

              That’s not true, you can pull the history from other users who happen to be online.

              • Aatube
                link
                fedilink
                22 hours ago

                The feds can also pull such history when they join the server

                • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 hours ago

                  Sure, and the users of the channel could decide whether to share that history with new users or not. My point is that if you don’t have messages on the server, the service can’t help here, and it’s up to the users of the channel to set their own policies. If the data is stored on the server, the service could be legally obligated to provide that data.

              • @deathbird@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 hours ago

                Far more than should tbh. Too many little game mods will have a Discord for questions and reporting issues rather than using their GitHub or a forum.

                • @JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 hours ago

                  Oh I agree, it’s very much a “forcing a round peg into a square hole” situation, but I doubt discord will make any changes to push back against it

              • @stoy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1010 hours ago

                That is a good point, I have never done that, and to me it is just a chat system…

            • @Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2313 hours ago

              90% of the reason I even have discord is because people much smarter than me use it to share information. Nobody uses other areas suited for sharing information anymore. It’s either Reddit or discord.

            • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              49 hours ago

              I remember running screen irssi on a separate computer and sshing into the server, reconnecting the screen with irssi in it.

              I still do that today.

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -73 hours ago

        Good.

        Discord sucks at such a fundamental level that the lack of any competing apps for this particularly awful niche actually restores some of my faith in humanity.

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 hour ago

            This is my genuine opinion and I don’t appreciate the condescension.

            You don’t have to like it, but trying to dismiss it as mere trolling is, at best, intellectually dishonest.

            • @AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              pretty certain their just confused why someone would say there’s not a niche for a chat client. chat clients always have, and always will exist.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6720 hours ago

      The only thing that really sucks about it is that knowledge that was openly searchable is now locked away behind logins.

      • @example@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3017 hours ago

        no, you’re also effectively locked out of any participation unless you provide an email address and phone number, which they won’t even tell you about in advance but use dark patterns and gaslighting that they noticed “suspicious activity” to step by step first ask you for an email and then once that is validated they prompt you for a phone number. the only thing they don’t do yet is ask for ID.

          • @example@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            811 hours ago

            it doesn’t seem to be server specific because once prompted there is no way to use the account again, even if you decided to just not use a server that may have these settings set.

            • subignition
              link
              fedilink
              57 hours ago

              Odd, I’ve never had that experience. Maybe you’re using a VPN or something that makes your IP look more suspicious.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          913 hours ago

          I keep trying to take out my phone number because I don’t want strangers seeing that shit, but… then “suspicious activity” gets detyected seconds later…

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 hours ago

        Discord is a fantastic IRC replacement.
        The issue is that people try to use it to replace forums, wikis, personal websites, issue trackers, git, and the kitchen sink, and it does none of these.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 hours ago

          Exactly. It’s like IRC w/ audio (and probably video now?) chat, and you can post gifs and whatnot. It should be used for discussion, and it’s perfectly okay for that. I would prefer something a bit more privacy focused (again, IRC is decent here, just needs some cryptography), but it’s okay.

          But yeah, not a fan of it being a resource for anything beyond meeting like-minded people to have discussions with.

    • @Gemini24601@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6122 hours ago

      While this is true, Discord has a massive user base, so it’s somewhat a privacy win for the common person

    • Estebiu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4522 hours ago

      its still the old chicken&egg problem: if you dont have communities you dont have users, and if you dont have users you dont have communities

      thats why everyone sticks to discord

    • @Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1521 hours ago

      What’s a good alternative that allows easy instant message, voice and video calls, and makes it easy to group my friends by game?

      • @fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 hours ago

        Matrix?

        I only put ? Because I don’t know what you mean of grouping your friends by game.

        Like a server/channel where everyone in it is both your friend and a player of that game or a contact group that manage so you can see who is that.

      • femtech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        719 hours ago

        I have been using revolt, going to setup my own server once I get better lol, last 3 times have been a cluster fuck to get it working. I got mattermost working the first try but it’s a slack replacement not discord.

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          118 hours ago

          I get that they have different target user base, but honestly, what’s the difference?

          • femtech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            317 hours ago

            Roles and permissions. Slack and mattermost is just allowed and disallowed to each channel.

          • @Voyajer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            416 hours ago

            Yeah, if you open the friends window on the bottom it should have a group chats bar with a button to create a server and then it works like discord where you can add additional text and voice channels

        • @Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1421 hours ago

          Not really no. SMS is nowhere near as versatile as a service like Discord in terms of being able to meet new people or have conversations that don’t overload unrelated but potentially interested people with notifications.

    • @recklessengagement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      419 hours ago

      Life has gotten better since I dropped it. Moved a dozen or so people over to Signal and have been running with that ever since.

      I do miss the ability to easily stream games, though.

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    3821 hours ago

    The attorney called Nexon’s demands “improper and overly burdensome”

    They will give you up in a heartbeat as long as they don’t have to do the extra work of finding you.

    Discord isn’t protecting anyone’s privacy just their bottom dollar

    Discord is committed to fulfilling its obligations under the law

  • @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1120 hours ago

    I’ve never played a Nexus game, and I’m definitely not going to start now. People who are pirating a game aren’t usually doing it bcz they hate the company, or have a vendetta of any kind. It’s usually a money issue. People are more than happy to pay for games when they have money, and you’re not a shit company.

    • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 hours ago

      No, it’s a convenience/service issue. Last time i’ve seen a third-party launcher was Mirrors Edge on Steam proton, and that thing failed to run since it wanted to open more than my security limit of 50k files, which no game hit before.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    719 hours ago

    Well, I have no First Amendment rights, so there’s that.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 hours ago

      I’m not exactly clear on the legal structure for digital platforms, but if you’re physically in the US, you have first amendment protections, regardless of citizenship or residency status. So as long as your group has some US persons in it, you should benefit from their first amendment protections. That said, the first amendment (and fourth, which is about unlawful searches) only applies to governments, so the service you use needs to refuse to hand over data for it to matter at all.

      It’s kind of like people in the US (e.g. me) benefiting from European GDPR protections. Some sites I use now have the option of demanding my deata be deleted, and many sites have cookie preferences, none of which are required in my area.

      That said, I definitely trust technological measures more than legal ones. So I don’t use Discord, because I don’t trust their technological protections. Ideally, Discord wouldn’t have any data to give up, and therefore there wouldn’t be a choice here, they would have no data to give up.