I do also read El País, so I think that balances it out. The subsidiary journalism that doesn’t do with trans people is very very good.

:3

There was a much better portrait on the front page. No idea why they didn’t include it in the article.

why not? i don’t read their articles on gaza, if that’s your concern

🫂

the article has a link to the lumix on amazon

oops, forgot. Pretend I said CoMaps.

check the fifth image on amazon, it’s pretty small

OrganicMaps CoMaps is another OSM client with buzz

ruul(e)

OpenStreetMaps?

I agree, but in a different way: No ethical consumption under capitalism 😃. My position on all companies is “take what you can get, bail when they yen grift”

System1 is an advertizing company that operates in the privacy niche. All I can get from all that ad copy you quoted is that they advertize 😀. I haven’t heard of them doing anything other than selling ads. AdExchanger (no idea what their reliability is but the writing style is quite frank so I’ll trust them) clocks System1 as a “Special-purpose acquisition company”.

The privacy community has a pretty favorable view of System1: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/search-engines/?h=startpage#startpage https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2020/05/03/relisting-startpage/

the union’s statement that it has a supermajority

the law is that they have to recognize if a majority of workers vote to unionize in an National Labor Relations Board secret ballot, so in any case this is a formality

As stated, the decision to unionize belongs to staff. The Foundation’s responsibility is to ensure that they can make their own choice freely. So that every eligible employee has an equal voice, we believe a secret-ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board is the appropriate path forward. This process protects individual choice and ensures that any outcome reflects the collective will of those eligible to participate.

this is their rhetoric. it seems they don’t like unions and are calling the bluff.

i mean, yeah?

I didn’t realize you meant the price of the base iPhone. But for one, at $500, you can get a Pixel 10a, which topped categories in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRoTOE3FqT0. Besides that you can get similar camera quality for $200 by simply buying a phone from four years ago,

No? The Oppo Find X9 Pro is $800, including tariffs. (In China, it’s ¥5300 while the iPhone 17 Pro is ¥9000.) And take care that it’s not just good, it’s reviewed as the absolute best of the year.

indoor gasoline generator