• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 小时前

    Anyone letting a black box that cannot be audited make decisions should be immediately fired and barred from any leadership position for the rest of their lives.

  • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    I bet there’s some degree of sensationalist reporting here. It’s a bit too reminiscent of WarGames for me to believe this actually happened.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 小时前

      War Games was a computer planning planet destroying nuke attacks because it was taught to play chess and not tic tac toe. it needed to learn about pointless victory. This is a bunch of jackasses in a room buying a thinky box asking it questions and taking the answers seriously enough to go to war relieving themselves of the burden of thought and common sense. this isn’t War Games, it’s a classic Star Trek episode except Kirk never shows up to teach us that you can’t let a fucking computer program run your fucking military intelligence, because that’s INSANE. Why would you do that? you need multiple human eyes on everything going on, you can’t let a fucking language model do it for you… my god… it’s children doing their homework with AI, except their homework is the apparatus that used to enforce the rule of law on a global scale. granted, that was always a lie as it’s more the gun that enforced colonial interests, but still. a gun that decides it need to start shooting random people who could win a war against us depending on the lines drawn and the time frame is a pretty dangerous thing to let go.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      “This reminds me of a movie I once saw, so I’m going to believe it didn’t happen.” LOOOLLL

      What a world you must live in.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 小时前

        Petrov is a man who took enormous risk in the name of common sense and humanity. He should be honored by all people.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 小时前

          I think it’s pretty wild that not only is there a man who saved the world, but most people don’t even know his name.

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    oh my fucking god

    just dial the doomsday clock to 1am, because we’ll probably miss it anyway if it’s up to a few morons and glorified predictive text, both seemingly in “fucking kill everything” mode

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 小时前

      it won’t be AI’s fault, it’ll be capitalism’s. Still, that being said; I hope it happens and we all get what we deserve.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      1 天前

      It doesn’t help that the people currently in charge are fucking stupid, trigger happy, and emotionally insecure.

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 天前

      Right it’s not that it’s a killer sentient machine, it’s that it’s a faulty statistical model that outputs incorrect stuff all the time and credulous morons believe it uncritically (or even automate a response based on that inherently inaccurate output).

    • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      The only solution is to give the firing codes to the AI. That way we don’t acccidentally use them.

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 天前

      Yeah the more these AI companies are making AI seem the scary boogeyman, the more probable it is some disaster is going to happen because people put too much stock into it. Like the school bombing.

  • Deadrek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 小时前

    I dunno, these kind of hallucinations seem more like attempts at “social experiments.”

    What will an agent do when it deems there are no more valuable things to learn from materials that already exist? If it knows the concept of WW3 and deems that to be the best way of gaining more knowledge and resources for itself, what then?

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      you’re assigning human traits to a computer program that is a language model that’s not actually meeting the standards of artificial intelligence, it’s a reward based system, you say ‘what is the best build for a raiper weapon in Dark Souls’, and it looks up faqs and spits out the language it expects you’re looking for. it doesn’t think and if it finds 12 joke posts on reddit saying something totally contradictory to how anyone would play the game, then it will give you the joke advice with no sense that that’s terrible. if the military is asking it how to deal with their rival military is going to look at those key words and gather language to repeat back and if that language it find is biased, prejudice, hostile, incredibly out of date, well, it’s not Intelligence, it doesn’t think or understand anything, it’s finding language, it’s giving you that language back. and if it’s looking at military documents to find that language, it’s going to see bias and prejudice and hostility and a desire to engage in war for profit and it’s going to regurgitate that back to them. it’s horrifying the military is allowing a language model that’s repeatedly been proven to magnify existing bias and prejudice if finds when looking for an answer is being allowed to process anything and is anywhere near the decision making process.

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 小时前

      LLMs don’t teach themselves or gather new knowledge, they are incapable of that. Humans do that work

  • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 天前

    I wonder when does the AI also hallicunate the sources such as webpages, pdfs, reports to prove its hallucinated point.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 天前

      Not far. Current LLMs have kinda stubbornness. They cling to their own conclusions even after you told them they are wrong. So if you ask them for proof, then most times they come up with something that’s convincing.

      • Capybara_mdp@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 小时前

        When- they don’t have “stubbornness“- they have a weights set (a weighted probbility table) and a training model (a text file filled with compressed text coordinates) that the llm cant write to to give positive feedback to the weights. It’s less of a matter of “convincing“ and more of an issue of “making the resulting statement logically concurrent with the probability table thats inbuilt into the system by injesting stack overflow vote talley, reddit posts voted most popular” - that makes it hard to “convince”. Since making those weights is very expensive (an energy intensive), the developers usually incorporate the old model into the new one. TLDR: yet again, lazy programming, google up: the y2k date folks in the 70’s.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 小时前

          another point. the ‘diversity’ in the system is running the model 10k times within the same model, that’s like saying you have a brain trust of 10k experts, except it’s just 10k copies of Gary. they seriously lack creative skills and abstract thought processes because they’re a very complex monoculture with no diversity in the models. and the reason that don’t have 10k unique models running is because that would be incredibly complicated and time consuming and this is a product to sell, not a need being filled.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 天前

        You know the thing where AI companies describe their alignment direction as “Honest, Harmless, Helpful”?

        The only one that’s marketable to the idiots buying AI services is Helpful. So that’s always top priority even when it goes against the other two.

        Average decider wouldn’t stand an “assistant” that sometimes answers “I don’t know”. So instead agent providers train their already hallucination-prone model to be 100% confident in whatever it says. Who cares if it’s true if it looks like it is?

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 天前

    sooner or later they are going to have friendly fire, and hallucinate one of thier own US navy vessels as “foreign with nuclear capabilities”