• 77 Posts
  • 2.28K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle




  • The problem with the “reinvestment” thesis is that the US and certainly not California, aren’t some fledgling economies struggling to develop and grow–wealth is so unhealthily concentrated it leads to those with outsized portion of the gains investing in things for the sake of investing rather than actually doing anything good for the economy(let alone nation) long term.

    Billionaires have wealth managers and investment teams throwing money at returns regardless of externalities, tax minimization, lobbying…they aren’t putting money into anything “real” that anyone on main street or any other street would benefit from.

    5% one time seems so poorly thought out it was designed to be voted down by those who want real change (permanent, ongoing), which is anyone not in the 1%




  • What does “X country corporation” in any industry mean when they have shell companies in the Cayman Islands, Isle of Man, Ireland or wherever tax rates and shelters can be best structured?

    Corporations have always been and will always be resource leeches that will abandon a country once they no longer have any blood left to suck. The host organism here in the US has already been overcome and Corps are about to start digesting previously pristine federal lands and forests for mining, forestry, and the critical national interest of off-road ATVing.

    There are no “country” corporations, they lobbied to be extra-national deliberately.












  • Depending on the state the (ex)employee is in, it can be illegal to withhold wages of any reason not prior authorized by the employee. As this was an involuntary termination(firing) the employee likely did not known it was coming. Depending on how she was normally paid it may have required payment at time of termination(depending on state again) so the employer may not have been able to deduct anything from a final check already processed/created.

    With that said, everything ever in any company, security and HR basics book ever says you let the person walk with something and if you want to pursue theft charges you do so as a company. Most companies know people who are being fired experience a lot of emotions and it can put them in a state where they may act unpredictably. It may escalate into violence, retaliation by the (ex-employee), cause a scene, etc., none of which are anything approaching “worth it” for a company unless you’re talking about trade secrets or the like and not a $1.14 vest. Many employees/humans, when given the chance to take a breath and leave the situation would have returned the vest, but being treated like a caged animal yields predictable results for corporations who sees their employees as such.

    Horrifying and unsurprising from Walmart where customers are/were funneled into violence chutes(black Friday) to save $50 on TVs each year with no thought to the bigger picture or safety basics.