• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not the biggest fan of eat the rich.

    IMO purge the parasites is more accurate.

    Eat the rich makes it sound like they are intrinsically more valuable whereas, like parasites, all they do is take value at the expense of the host.

    It’s not even a fatal thing, their hoarding is a mental illness that must be addressed for the good of society.

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They’re starving now, dipshit.

    They’re starving because the rich are hoarding all of the food.

    • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      It’s not just food, it’s housing and electricity and power to improve the world.

      A trillion dollars is being held captive by one man and we’re allowing it. What could a trillion dollars do for the planet, for each person on earth.

      Something must be done about the parasitic wealthy because they’re causing real harm to people every day they stay rich.

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People all over the world will be celebrating! I also can’t wait till that orange c**t drops dead - the parties will be awesome. And the tears of the maga shitheads over the death of their cult leader will be sweet.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If Elon was flayed in the streets and his family was deported to countries they don’t know the language… It wouldn’t solve anything. They are just cunts taking advantage of a situation. So yes, flay the fuck, but change the laws to make sure it isn’t possible again

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Don’t eat shit, mulch the rich.

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I support what Mamdani is doing, and I think in the long run it will work.

    Having said that, it’s absurd to say that New York City has tested much of anything. Mamdani was elected just 7 months ago. Has there even been a tax season since he was elected? Moving can also easily take half a year. He balanced the budget on paper, but only by doing stuff like deferring payments to union pension funds. That’s not sustainable. Maybe next year he’ll be able to keep the budget balanced and make all the necessary pension payments.

    You can say that Mamdani is in the process of doing this, and so far it seems to be working. But, at a bare minimum you need to wait a full year to see if it’s working, and realistically you probably won’t know for 5 years or more.

    But, claiming it has been tested is like saying “You can absolutely survive on a berries-only diet. I’m proof. I started that diet this morning and I’ve never felt healthier!”

  • ZDL@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    18 hours ago

    He’s terrified of getting taxed.

    He should be terrified of being executed for crimes against the people.

    His priorities are skewed.

    • HostilePasta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Are we, as Americans, finally going to grow a spine like the French? Are we going to bring guillotines back? My heart says yes, but my head says no.

      • ZDL@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        🎼 See them bow their heads to die as we once bowed when they rode by! 🎶

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I have been thinking about an appropriate punishment, but I think they would all need a personal approach that we have no time for.

          I’m thinking being burried alive in a. casket, filled with chalk, and flesh-eating insects.

  • Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The whole point of the phrase is: When the poor have nothing left to eat, they will eat the rich.

    It wasnt coined as a threat. It’s a warning. The poor are already starving, and there is a limit.

    And the thing is that ‘rich’ is not an intrinsic property, it’s not genetic. When you eat the rich, everything they were hoarding - that which gave them the title ‘rich’ - becomes accessible. It doesn’t disappear from the system like an MMO inventory.

    Only after the starving poor eat the rich, will there be a path to a possible future without starvation.

    • vandsjov@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If Elon dies, lots of his wealth will disappear as the stock price of his companies will drop. Not sure how much and if they will recover but, like it or not, he is a big part of the reason the stock market loves his companies.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      When the rich are too rich there are ways, and when the poor are too poor there are ways.

      Last winter we sold two girls and endured, and this winter, if this one my woman bears is a girl, we will sell again. One slave I have kept—the first. The others it is better to sell than to kill, although there are those who prefer to kill them before they draw breath. This is one of the ways when the poor are too poor.

      When the rich are too rich there is a way, and if I am not mistaken, that way will come soon.

      ~ Pearl S. Buck, The Good Earth

      • Yliaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        People have been theorizing (or fantasizing, rather) about the supposed collapse of the system since 1850, thinking it was soon then.

        Guess it’s soon enough for us to not see it in this lifetime either.

        Aka, worthless.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s collapsed a bunch of times.

          The sudden, often arbitrary, and devastating failures make up much of the case for why the system is bad.

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Is the system bad? Sure.

            Will a good system finally show up? Doubt.

            Those collapses you mentioned haven’t lead to a worthwhile system, have they?

            Collapse is meaningless on its own.

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Ever since 1850? Geee, just two years after the Revolutions of 1848, I guess the peoples should never be appeased because they’ll just want more and more!

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I wasn’t talking about the US 🤦

            It’s stupid how people just assume it’s america if you don’t specify.

            • ddplf@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              What the fuck are you talking about? Spring of Nations didn’t spread to the US in the slightest.

              • Yliaster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Then what are you talking about?

                As for me, I’m referring to Marx and communist critiques of capitalism that have spanned several European countries in its inception which were then expanded by 20th century and modern communists who repeatedly said that collapse was imminent and inevitable.

                That’s been a consistent theme that hasn’t changed since around 1850.

                People keep going “oh yeah, it’s really gonna collapse this time! There’s gonna be real good change soon!” Nope. Bs. Historically inaccurate.

                • ddplf@szmer.info
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 minutes ago

                  Then what are you talking about?

                  I’m running out of names for that advent, so here’s the last one, I’m sorry but you’re just too semantically demanding. So here goes - Springtime of the Peoples

                  As for the rest. Are you seriously claiming that there were no uprisings or revolutions since 1850? Brother, I’m sure you can do some better research.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Billionaires are the parasites of humanity, they only take and give nothing back. These delusional narcissists think society would crumble without them, while it’s them who are holding humanity back.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Billionaires are mentally ill hoarders, they will fight over every last penny, just like hoarders do when you clean up their filthy house. Except, they are much more insane than someone collecting newspapers, they will screw over thousands of people to make $100 and sleep like babies.

    • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They don’t care if the climate/a pandemic/a world war/anything else reduces the human race to 10000 members, as long as they are still at the top of that group.

  • nocturne@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The poor have no need of the rich, but the rich could not exist without the poor.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Robert Wyatt:

      There is a kind of compromise
      You are master of
      Your endless gentle nudging
      Left us polarised
      It's hard to talk to enemies
      And we are enemies
      What we had in common
      Makes it even worse
      You're proud of being middle class
      Meaning upper class
      You say you're self sufficient
      But you don't dig your own coal
      
      I think that what you're frightened of
      More than anything
      Is knowing you need workers
      More than they need you
      
    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      and to the end the rich has propaganda to convince some of the poor ones that they are poor because of “other” people are making them poor and not the rich, add in other things like lgbtq+, wokeness, women, abortions.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Musk: But I’m Atlas, holding the world on my shoulders! The poor would starve if I shrugged!

      • almost1337@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        23 hours ago

        He’s been shrugging and the poor have been starving, so maybe it’s time for something different.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Much like anything on social media… we have yet another example of opinion masquerading as fact.

    We clearly need to return to facts backed by rigorous testing. Lead by example I say: Let’s gather up a few groups and let the numbers speak for themselves. None of that cherry picking with undersized groups. We’ll clearly need to gather up a sufficent number of participants. We can even run several rounds of testing. Really just leave no question unanswered. Really explore the concept.

    … It’d really just bring about that change we desperately need in this world. The scientific method really can just solve so many issues.

  • Corigan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t know man we could feed the globe for ~100billion a year sooo just him alone would give us 10+ years to figure it out and honestly his greed being absent will probably heal a lot if things too. Dude doesn’t pay taxes so what does he support besides Nazi’s?

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Considering we make the food… he’s not needed in the “feeding” of anyone. He’s literally costing us more than what he “creates”

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m not going to pretend that billionaires losing all their money will fix all our problems.

    But I quite like the idea of them no longer having it.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Right? If I’m dying on this planet I’ll blow up the rocket going to Mars in order to keep you here to die with me.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not them losing their wealth, it’s eliminating all of the rules set up to get them there in the first place. It’s preventing them from laying people off. It’s keeping them from developing more surveillance, more oppressive rules, no products that we don’t own and do on. You can’t lobby a congressman, if you’ve been eaten.