It’s amazing how these people can essentially burn billions, trillions combined, even, of dollars on very avoidable mistakes and it’s a “whoopsie” but you ask for a fraction of it to go to the citizens and it’s “a waste of money” or “might not work despite all the evidence from elsewhere”.
And then also the execs get a few million dollars a year in bonuses and such because they’re “so smart and important.”
When a car company has this many recalls, it should be enough to automatically ban all of their unsold vehicles from the streets. Until they pass several inspections and audits.
Who knows how many people died or were irreversibly injured due to at least 11 million faulty cars. That number is still probably on the low end.
Ironic the first successful car company from the early 1900s has come to this.
Well in fairness to ford this is the first time that any company has ever tried to replace all their stuff with AI. There has been no prior attempts and therefore no cautionary tales they could possibly have learnt from. This was an utterly unavoidable mistake and no one needs to be fired over it.
/s
rehire to train the AI, then LAY THEM off again and hire cheaper outsourced tech engineers down the line.
The problem is, “training” the AI is also largely a myth. A bunch of idiots in charge unironically think that if you force all your workers to use llms, llm will magically get better. Like, seriously, they believe that.
You wouldn’t vibe code a car…
“Yeah I’m really into cars”
drives a Mustang
lmao, sure thing, buckaroo
I’m very much not into cars, so what’s wrong with a mustang?
Also not really into cars, but I think it has to do with the fact that people who know nothing about cars think it’s one of the best cars ever or something (mostly due to marketing aimed at machismo and shit). But if you start learning about cars there’s probably much better, more enjoyable rides out there, probably for much cheaper (since they’re not purely about marketing and image).
Please take all of this with a heaping pinch of salt and anyone who knows better is more than welcome to correct me or add to what I said if I missed the mark completely.
More or less yeah. They are big impractical cars that kind of look like they are for the real world because they have storage space, seats in the back and stuff like that, but really they are for driving around and showing off how big and important you are.
Like something like a Ferrari or a Lamborghini but worse because at least they look like sports cars designed for racing.
I certainly wouldn’t want somebody who drove a car like that designing a car for doing the school run. Completely different priorities.
That one person at Ford going I told you so must feel so vindicated
They didn’t buy the hype; they knew it was bullshit from the start. Seriously, do we think upper-level management can’t understand such a simple message that we’ve been repeating for years? … Of course they knew; they always knew; they got bonuses for pretending not to know.
The above-average proportion of narcissists in c-suites combined with a “magic box” that tells you how smart and insightful all your ideas are and how you’re such a special big-penised boy for having them leading to delusional behaviour seems on track for me.
Nope, they are legit that stupid. They’re professional idiots who only know things about their tiny niche and have NO idea what everyone else does. They have no idea how much work goes into a product, they just think that everyone does what they do, meaning “Just type/draw some stuff”.
Yeah, but they thought they would be the one that would be able to harness AI. Like all the others
deleted by creator
There was a brief time in the early 90s when Object-Oriented Programming was still new to the business world. Clueless managers thought it meant somebody could draw a box labeled “Do Payroll” and somehow software would appear. They’re doing that same thing now with AI.
Your average MBA
Clueless managers and completely misunderstanding new trends, name a more iconic duo.
Except object oriented programming is a real thing that exists.
Yeah but it doesn’t work out described, if you do it wrong then it won’t work
While Output = wrong Run CreateOutput Print Output.
Wait really?
Tell me you’re a manager without telling me
Hope the engineers asked for significant hikes over their previous salaries
i would asked at least triple, and 1-2 years(for each worked previously) of severence if laid off again.
Im glad they are struggling. All corporations are bad.
Did they include “do not hallucinate” in the prompt? Didnt think so. Classic mistake
the AI would Hallucinate the part where “it doesnt hallucinate”
see my other comment.
Unbelievably, this is real advice I’ve heard from corporate AI experts.
It is included in the guardrails for my orgs copilot integration. Surprisingly, it still hallucinates.
If you ask chatgpt for 100 5 letter words around a single topic, instead of saying it can’t give you 100 words it will just start adding 6 letter words and then start cutting off a letter.
It’s astounding how much faith people put in this software
Well that’s just ridic
That movie was ridic too
Obviously the solution is to tell it to not hallucinate that it isnt hallucinating
it will hallucinate that its not hallucinating.
so tell it to not hallucinate that it isnt hallucinating that it isnt hallucinating.
"Oh, thanks for pointing that out, I 100% hallucinated those connections this last time. Let’s go over what’s real:
- real
- real
- real
- hallucinated
- real"
Surprisingly
“I do not think it means what you think it means.”
I went to a conference a few months ago and the very first speaker gave the following advice with a straight face to a room full of professional software engineers: “Your biggest limitation on your productivity is going to be token management, so just buy as many tokens as you can so you won’t even have to think about it.” And that guy, supposedly, didn’t work for OpenAI or Anthropic.
I kind of hope he’s at least getting kickbacks because I would rather he be a secret corporate AI shill than just a submissive gimp for dommy mommy AI industry attempting to recruit more paypigs to her flock. At least that would have more dignity.
i always wondered what they are peddling at these AI conferences, we have them almost daily here in the west. im not really surprised they have a hired “spokesman” to do it, are the engineers buying into this? or they know full well the AI isnt shit?
Well, the unfortunate truth is AI is an extremely useful tool for software engineering. I’ve gotten to where I use it most days and it has made some tasks waaaay easier and faster.
But it’s not a silver bullet that solves all your problems and replaces an engineer that understands their projects, business needs, context, inter-team dependencies and agreements, risk mitigation, etc. And we also understand that it will never be cheaper than it is right now and getting too dependent on a tool that may be prohibitively expensive in the future is unwise.
If I were an independent contractor, paid by the job, building a bespoke self contained application for someone where they give me all the context I need for it, I’d 100% be using AI to do the majority of the coding and testing. Get the job done fast and move on. But throwing all of your money at it like it will solve all your problems is just moronic, particularly when you work at an enterprise scale where literally no individual person can give the AI the full context of all our systems.
Lulz, amen to that
“Write program worth 1 million dollars. Do not hallucinate. No mistakes. Good code only. Make secure. No vulnerabilities. Follow all standards. No spaghetti code. No anti-patterns. No deprecated dependencies. Runs fast, and cheap, and completely functionally. Does what it is supposed to. Minimize token use.”
Perfect. Iron-clad. Let the profits commence.
This is like not even a parody of what they think lol. It’s so ridiculous.
Got it, this program was worth one million dollars before uber was invented.
