

It’s not either-or. Money that aren’t spend on nuclear will be mostly spent on burning fossil fuels, because that’s the niche they occupy together.
It’s not either-or. Money that aren’t spend on nuclear will be mostly spent on burning fossil fuels, because that’s the niche they occupy together.
He can be working on whatever unrelated part and just be excited about the product that his company makes. It’s not impossible
Netflix showed time and time again that they are shit at counting money. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out they’re losing money on those ads but will do them anyway because managers eat the worst possible hype for breakfast.
No, no they weren’t, not even close. Unless you’re using AI in the loosest way possible, including machine learning algorithms that we were calling AI as a joke in the 90s.
Fork people who come up with it right in the hand.
It’s a bit less about that, and a bit more about the fact that real robots cost a lot, require incredible investment upfront, and the results are very physical, it’s very hard to dupe idiots into believing you achieved something great when you wasted all the money.
Look how easily everyone swallowed the llm bullshit, and how hard it is for Elongated Muskrat to convince everyone that his people in cosplay suits are totally robots you guys.
I use vintage vim, fucks hard on my arch (which I use btw)
It was kind of OK to refer to enemies as AI back then because not a single human (or investor) truly believed that a bot in CS can write text, paint an image, or replace you at your job. Now misusing the term leads to an unnecessary dangerous confusion.
Not really, at least couple of steps above, it’s 30 square meters overall. It’s nice for me, but the kitchen is too small to have such luxuries as an oven.
Five or six fast food visits and you could’ve bought enough
But this is the main problem. It’s boots theory all over. For people living paycheck to paycheck the calculation of “if I don’t eat for a week I can invest into myself” doesn’t sound as appealing as for people who can afford to do a little bit of savings.
Thankfully, I’m in pretty good position, I don’t live in US, so my diet consists of food, not of sugar and sawdust. I do have an induction cooktop, and can confirm it’s indeed amazing. My enormous privilege aside, I would like to some day get into the oven territory.
This is unbelievably untrue statement
Well yeah, because you made up your mind and not listening to anything capable of changing it.
Don’t have one, don’t have space to have one, don’t have money to get one, don’t have any hope to ever get a place with one. Just like evergrowing amount of people.
German human is no laughing matter.
You would be surprised, but human biology is slightly more complicated than a furnace that you throw coal into.
Those people weren’t the ones painting paintings and writing stories
It is once again, incredibly simplistic view of a very complicated issue, so simplistic it stops being accurate.
It’s an overly simplistic view of the very complex set of issues. Even if we isolate the weight, which we shouldn’t do, even if we assume we should all strive to be of some set weight, which we shouldn’t do even harder, there is no one definitive factor that contributes to that. Reducting it all to “just eat better bro” is, in a lot of cases, akin to saying to a person with depression “just stop being sad”.
There is no “weight gene”, but it doesn’t mean there is no underlying physical issues that a person can’t overcome with just a sheer force of will.
And that’s not even going into the poverty cycle issue, which means that for some people better dietary choices simply unavailable.
Notice, I don’t know the percentage of people with it, but neither do you. But the problem is, weather a person can do something about their weight or not, putting all the, pardon the pun, weight of their bodyshape on them is almost never helpful, and almost always harmful.
I keep my bread in the fridge, and then it doesn’t matter.
I guess it means I’m in Pathfinder universe or something