fixed

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 minutes ago

    “ NOOO YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND BRO! OUR BUSINESS MODEL DOESN’T WORK IF WE CAN’T DO MASS SURVELIANCE BRO!”

    • dafta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      DNS blocking doesn’t work with cookie prompts since they’re from the same domain as the website. You need something like ublock origin which has the feature to block specific DOM components on the website.

      • zeroConnection@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        But they will block those tracking cookies even if you “accept” to being tracked. But yeah, good point, best to combine both

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I still run umatrix in Firefox snd the level of calling out that even simple pages do is shocking. And likely all those called sites even for fonts are collecting something about you.

  • Damarus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Unfortunately some pages have started blocking scrolling when the cookie banner is not closed properly. That can also be fixed with uBlock of course, but I encounter that specific problem quite often.

    • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Some sites do those blocks very haphazardly and you can get past just removing couple html-lines, they don’t really care since most people won’t bother to look (or don’t know you can do it). At minimum it might just be “overflow: hidden” added on the top somewhere lmao. It’s a pain to do but if it’s something specific you need only once, might be worth to check

  • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My setup is by default all cookies are session cookies unless manually changed.

    Unlock doesn’t really give that as an option but Vivaldi has it built in.

  • BeUnique@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That shit should be illegal. Accept all / reject all. That’s it. If somebody is disabling cookies, literally nobody in the entire world wants any of them! “Oh yeah, please, only keep my location data but not the data about my purchase decisions”…

    • WrathEnchanter@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have good news for you: In the EU (which forced everyone to have the cookie-accept-banners in the first place) it IS illegal.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The EU didn’t force anyone to have the cookie banners. If the site only uses nessecary cookies - the kind you can’t turn off in the prompt - there doesn’t need to any prompts because that’s perfectly fine. The intrusive, obnoxious and deliberate confusing popups are from data harvesters throwing a tantrum because they can’t stalk you every waking second any more, and complying in the most malicious and disrespectful way they can.

        Cookie banners are nothing to do with the EU and everything to do with tech-bros.

        • WrathEnchanter@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I mean… The EU could’ve also said ‘no privacy invasive cookies’ instead of ‘cookie Banner if privacy invasive cookies’. I don’t think being able to disable is bad, I think they didn’t go far enough (and also of course datapeople only comply in the most malicious way possible. It’s literally their job, a job that shouldn’t exist.)

          • bless@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Even the idea of tightening regulations for igaming has many EU countries frothing at the mouth, what makes you think that this didn’t start as “no privacy-invasive cookies?”

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If the cookies are nessecary for the site to technically function, you don’t need to be promoted to accept. The law - which doesn’t even mention cookies - allows the absolute minimum amount of data required to provide a service to be gathered. For a website, that included cookies for storing preferences, shopping baskets, login tokens, etc.

            • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              But it must still inform you and give you the right to not use the service if you don’t want this form of collection happening, its just that you can’t use the service and refuse the bare minimum they need to operate.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah sure, give me whatever cookies aren’t already blocked. I love cookies. Is that all of them?

    (closes LibreWolf, which nukes everything except whitelisted sites)

    …pathetic.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Amen. If the endpoint serves up the content I’m looking for our interaction is over. The site doesn’t need a response.

  • flint@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    19 hours ago

    In my experience uBlock origin doesn’t really get rid of cookie consent banners/dark patterns. Damn good at bonking ads though.

    • zerozaku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Also getting rid of cookie banners doesn’t mean the site won’t track with third party cookies. The cookies are ON by default and until you tell them to turn it OFF, they keep the cookies on.

      • flint@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        That’s a good point. However in the EU it should be the opposite - otherwise the site is violating GDPR.

        Sometimes I have a feeling sites do whatever they want anyway regardless of bow many dark patterns I click through to find the “no” and “off” buttons because there are no real repercussions. Just like the “do not track” request and “robots.txt” are essentially useless.

      • flint@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        Aah, you are right. Lazy me actually never looked at those. Now I did and it seems to work just fine enabling the Annoyances > Cookie Banners.

        • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          2nd panel means you have to do it again and again for every new website you visit, or if you clear cookies regularly. Using the ublock addon, you have to enable this setting once, and it is persistent across sessions.

      • underdawg@lm.kluge.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        having too many filters slows down pages significantly, you should keep only those you actually need

    • autriyo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I want some of them to stay though, it wouldn’t be a huge hassle to not have them, but I’m a bit lazy…

        • 87Six@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          I’m not aware of that specifically, but LibreWolf by default blocks all cookies and allows you to set specific sites which can store cookies, very easily, using a sitr whitelist.

          This combined with ublock origin should improve your privacy a lot without sacrificing any usability at all.

            • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Essentially, when browsers started to initially implement toggles to block third party cookies more than a decade ago, advertisers in response pressured website hosts to mark their cookies as “essential/required” (AKA forced cookies). You will not get the same revenue as a website host if you do not play ball with this, and some go even a step further by routing/disguising their cookies through trusted domains (google, amazon, etc…) to mask the “true source” , in an attempt to mitigate detection from basic browser filters.

              Ublock Origin and the like are pretty good at catching most of them through crowdsourced lists though.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        18 hours ago

        under settings,privacy and security, under cookies and site data (just above the “Clear cookies and site data every time you close Firefox” box) there’s “manage exceptions” that will exclude your favorites from getting erased every time.

      • StellarExtract@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        The firefox extension “forget me not” allows you to fully control which cookies are retained, which are deleted, and how/when. It’s easy to customize individual sites on the fly. And it’s open source!
        Combined with “I still don’t care about cookies,” you almost never see or have to deal with another cookie consent banner.

      • Winter_Oven@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Pretty sure there is an “Allow” exception that you can use to keep cookies for the sites you want.

        (I think you) click on the shield in the URL bar, and a small window comes, which should have a small toggle that says “Keep cookies and site data”.

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Thanks, but not thanks, I don’t want to be logging in every site every single time I restart my browser; I just simply use AdNauseam with DandelionSprout lists (not all tho), NoCoin lists, the integrated lists, then I use Decentraleyes for not having to depend on external CDNs for almost anything, HaGeZi as my DNS provider, and OpenSnitch for system-wide interactive blocking of any suspicious domains or IPs…

      Oh, and hBlock, just to add a little more of paranoia, and ClamAV with Clamd and ClamOnAcc.