I want to know how it is determined whether something is a propaganda mill

there’s also this clearly negative one https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3334442/chinas-lgbtq-community-loses-safe-spaces-blued-finka-apps-vanish

how is it known? What evidence is there? I did not have much trouble finding negative articles. What is the basis of this claim?

They wouldn’t put it on the front page, no?

https://www.scmp.com/video/hong-kong/2126479/what-does-it-feel-be-sexual-minority-hong-kong

what about this?

can’t that statement be used to claim any site is a propaganda mill and should be discarded? Couldn’t I do that to throw out the bbc?

edit: also this https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3334442/chinas-lgbtq-community-loses-safe-spaces-blued-finka-apps-vanish

I disagree on the first one, I’ll grant you the second is about north korea, an important ally, but even if they aren’t outright hardline stance negative if I was running a pro china propaganda mill why even acknowledge these things?

even if I feel pressure to acknowledge, why the front page?

there’s this

https://www.scmp.com/video/hong-kong/2126479/what-does-it-feel-be-sexual-minority-hong-kong

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3342862/hong-kongs-jimmy-lai-faces-sentencing-national-security-trial?module=top_story&pgtype=homepage why is this on the front page?

https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3342720/north-korean-soldier-ukraine-fears-forced-repatriation-i-wont-survive?module=AI_Recommended_for_you_In-house&pgtype=homepage

this too?

seems awfully negative for a propaganda mill, no?

to be clear I don’t know them and you may know something I do not but on first glance that doesn’t seem like what I would expect.

Is there any issue tracker for this?

i haven’t can you explain?

It’s a simulation of a human consciousness, it can be paused and restarted when certain conditions are met.

Then don’t do it that way, put a human consciousness into a machine and wait. They said ever, we can get as sci-fi as we want here

You should try cosmic.

I do not, monkeys include the apes.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CkO8k12QCP0

here’s a video from an evolutionary biologist explaining.

This is not a cladistically unsound notion, apes are a subgroup of monkey.

What do you prefer about piefed? Lemmy seems perfect to me.

i recommend trying out thunder, I just switched from sync.

It’s foss and actively developed

Arch should not be used by beginners and hacking together a distro to make that happen was never a good idea. A team that cannot even figure out SSL certs should not have even attempted it.

Most of it speaks to their lack of competency. Issues like this are less frequent on arch and the whole point of this distro is that It’s supposed to be an easier arch.

it is in fact harder arch.

All of it matters, hard disagree, even if none of them are individually that bad it shows an insane degree of incompetence

the linux mint thing happened one time and was resolved, it shows no history of being incompetent, that’s why it isn’t mentioned, it’s hardly worth mention, one security breach in the entire history of the project is not a big deal.

furthermore i personally don’t think mint is a good distro either so, whatever.

It can be both.

https://github.com/arindas/manjarno

Yes and I stand by its validity.

That’s worse undeniably, but various curable diseases are in fact like that and animal testing makes that happen less in this world and you oppose it because it wouldn’t save your person? That’s monstrously selfish.