• Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It should be the norm, but in reality the tram/trolley/streetcar is going to end up damaged, and people it carries injured. Besides, it would be to beg for a lawsuit.

  • shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where I am from, the transportation company will call Taxis to get the people to their destination station in case a car blocks the tramline, until the car has been towed. The car owner has to pay the Taxi invoices.

      • shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Germany. I found an article about a case where the parking offender tried to appeal the penalty (translated):

        The taxis picked up passengers waiting at the stops and drove them to other stops along the route. This went on for an hour, then the car parked not far from a sign saying “Please keep a sufficient distance from the tracks” was towed away and the route was clear again. This interactive view on Google Street View shows the location.

        When the VGF then demanded €973.13, €25 of this was a flat-rate fee for expenses – and the rest was the cost of the rail replacement taxis. After hearing witness statements, the court ruled out any manipulation by the taxi industry, and the court also found no evidence of any delay in towing the car.

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love this way of dealing with such a situation!
      It both helps the passengers (who will still be later than without inconsiderate car parking) and teaches a lesson.
      Best way to make sure there’s no weaseling out of the responsibility is to tow the car and only fork it out after an advance payment to cover the taxi costs has been made.
      The driver (who maybe wasn’t the owner) has no money? Make it the owner’s problem!

      • Bitswap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Its actually terrible. That just means if you’re rich enough you can ruin people day with no consequences…

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Well, first dealing with a towed car isn’t “no consequences”. Second, right now this guy barely has any consequences for the people he fucked over, and the people he fucked over just have to figure it out themselves, at least with the free taxi thing everyone gets to their destination at a reasonable time and the guy who caused the delay pays for it.

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t know how to tell you…
          …but that’s how the current world works in most parts.
          And delayed transport is at the lower end on the scale of life ruining events.
          Do I really need to bring up Epstein and the orchestrated abuse and worse?

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    someone in other post about tesla parked in wrong lane, told me “Woah now, are we sure killing somebody is the right call here? It’s only illegal parking after all.” When I said call the police!
    Bro, if you don’t know where to park, don’t fucking drive!!! Where I live, we have tons of idiots like these, blocking sidewalks and transit, so we fucking call the police!!!

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here in KC they’ve started fining heavily for people who block the rails.

    Me? I’d rather they put a cowcatcher on the front and destroy the cars instead.

    • Pappabosley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      In Melbourne (Australia), they removed the cow catchers, but not the aggression. You get one, maybe two courtesy bell rings before you get punted.

    • HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why not both? License plate reader that send automatic fine ( like speed camera ) and a cowcatcher that desteoy it after also the car owner should pay for the removing of what left of the car after

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Car rolls onto the sidewalk. Crushes a pedestrian.

      Car had a baby in it. Baby dies.

      Car belongs to beloved old man neighbor. Whole city now hates the train and gets it removed.

      This suggestion keeps coming up, and it never gets less juvenile. The solution is simple - aggressively fine these people. Scale the fine based on income. If it sits there for more than a minute, call a tow truck to move it like an adult. And then install a knee high concrete barrier around the tracks to stop cars from getting there in the first place.

      • blauergrashalm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        barriers on the road are not good. Pedestrians cant cross anymore, making the city less walkable. Emergency vehicles sometimes use the tram lane to overtake jams. Now they would get stuck in traffik. And in case of an accident a concrete barrier may make things worse.

      • grue@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If police cars can ram other vehicles, so can streetcars. The strawman nonsense you posted isn’t a consideration for high-speed pit maneuvers by the former, and it would be even less relevant for gentle nudges by the latter.

        • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Idk these are flatly not comparable situations. A high speed chase ending in a pit maneuver is EXTREMELY dangerous before, during, after, and even around without being touched. A streetcar pushing a parked vehicle a handful of feet at low speed while ringing a warning bell with a driver keeping an eye on the situation is MUCH safer.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If someone leaves their baby in a car and parks it on the tracks, then it’s their fucking fault if the baby dies. The parent/owner of the car should be charged with negligent infanticide in that case.

        Also, no one who owns a tesla is “beloved.”

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            The tram operator wouldn’t even see that there’s a baby inside.

            The owner of the vehicle could petition the city’s transportation authority and say “your tram killed my baby!” But as soon as the authority sees the details of the situation they should say “You parked a car on the tracks and left your baby in it?!? Dumbass.” And stamp “DENIED” in big red letters.

            Even if that person contacts a journalist, the headline should read “Dumbass tesla owner parks car on tracks and leaves baby inside. Baby dies.”

            There’s no reason why the tram operator should ever have to find out there was a baby involved.

                • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  How does “what journalists should do” come into play in other situations? Journalists should also exclude shooters names and images from reporting, how does that go?

                  You’re going to all this trouble to explain how we can deal with killing a baby, without realizing the better option is to just not kill it in the first place.

                  I don’t think there’s any point continuing this discussion.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah fick that baby. Fancy being left alone in a Tesla, useless child.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I didn’t say the baby is useless, I said it’s the parent/owner of the car who’s responsible. The tram driver isn’t even gonna know there’s a baby inside.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          With a bloodthirsty absolutist mentality like that, have you considered a career in ICE?

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not bloodthirsty nor absolutist.

            If a tram sees a car negligently parked on the tracks, it should plow through it. The tram operator isn’t going to see if there’s a baby inside. Whoever parked the car on the tracks and left the baby inside is responsible for their own negligence, and also a psychopath.

            • blarghly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Explain why the baby deserves to die because of their negligent parent.

              Regardless of who we assign blame to, the important part is that if a train flips a car off its tracks, a baby in that car could die. So if we prioritize baby non-death, we can say that the train shouldnt be violently flipping cars off its tracks

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I didn’t say they deserve to die. I only said their death is the parent’s responsibility for leaving them in a car parked on the tracks.

                If a parent leaves a baby in the woods, no one would be arguing about “maybe bears shouldn’t eat babies!” They would be saying “Maybe you shouldn’t leave your baby unattended in the woods!”

                Leave a baby in the woods, it dies. Leave a baby on the train tracks, it dies. In both cases, it’s the negligent parent’s fault. Not the bear’s or the train’s.

        • huppakee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The solution is simple - aggressively fine these people. Scale the fine based on income. If it sits there for more than a minute, call a tow truck to move it like an adult.

          They give them fines and might get the car towed, but most places they fail to make the fine an actual punishment if you are wealthy: fines should be based on income and wealth.

  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Car should be towed and the owner should pay a fine of 1% of their income+wealth, stocks and bonuses included.

    • Geobloke@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s way too hard to calculate

      Just make it a percentage make value of the car.

      Though, considering I had a car that I bought for a carton of beer (the fuel in the car was probably worth more than the beer), you might want to say a minimum.

      That car was amazing. A Suzuki baleno for those who are aware, key had snapped off in the lock so the car didn’t lock, started the car with a bottle opener and I could take it anyway

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a cybertruck in the snow, at this point it must be mostly rust, you try to tow it it’ll just break apart.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You could use the value of the car as a base. Untill if the car is worth nothing then tow its annoying but so id waiting for someone to come back from whatever. but if it’s a cybertruck tow it then 1% if new would be $1000 plus lot, tow and admin fees.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      And risk damaging the streetcar?

      Even if you try to force the vehicle owner to pay, there’s no guarantee they will. Not to mention the non zero chance of causing a breakdown of the streetcar.

      There’s also the small chance the vehicle isn’t just parked there, but something happened.

      Honestly you’re just better off calling a tow or something.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even if you try to force the vehicle owner to pay, there’s no guarantee they will.

        And they won’t drive until they pay up, it’s as simple as that.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        And risk damaging the streetcar?

        I imagine if a kampfwagen gets bumped by just about anything, the biggest hazard would be random stainless steel and plastic litter all over the street.

        There’s also a non-zero chance it will just go critical and set itself ablaze. XD

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The punishment should be determined based on exactly when they purchased their teslar. /s

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      All cybertrucks were sold when we knew Elon was fucked in the head though. That’s only valid for other Tesla models.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      But it’s a Cybertruck. So it will instantly break if touched, leaving even more insanely sharp edges…

  • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    This happens every fucking winter and not just with these trash cans but all cars. In most of our streets the streetcars don’t have a dedicated and separated lane (or signal priority), making them pretty much just worse buses that stop in the middle of the street, making you cross a car lane on the way to the sidewalk.

  • edgarde@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    What does a Cybertruck weigh? I wanted those guys to tip it onto the sidewalk. Could 8 passengers turtle that thing?